đ¸ Jason Pettit
Not So Different . .
"All that I have achieved are these dreams
locked in silver.â â Paul Caponigro
seen from Ukraine
seen from India

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Martinique
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Lithuania
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil
đ¸ Jason Pettit
Not So Different . .
"All that I have achieved are these dreams
locked in silver.â â Paul Caponigro

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
On Landscape interview
In my occasional series of blogs (3 years since the last and only one!) I thought Iâd add an interview I did with the very talented Michela Griffith for On-Landscape magazine. I keep intending to blog more regularly, and thought posting this might spur me on to keep it up!Â
Can you tell me a little about yourself â your education, early interests and career?
I grew up on the edge of a small town in East Yorkshire, where my dad was a dustman and my mum worked in factories, often on nights, so needed to sleep during the day. Like many children back in the 70âs and 80âs I was often ushered out of the house to go and âplay outside somewhereâ, so I spent much of the time exploring the nearby farmland and countryside. Iâve had a love of nature and the outdoors ever since. Two or three days indoors soon has me climbing the walls.
Iâd always been fairly good at art at school, so after leaving with underwhelming exam results, I enrolled on a general Art and Graphic Design course at a nearby art college. This included a small amount of photography and was where I first got my hands on an SLR camera. I learned the basics of aperture and shutter speeds etc., and how to process and print in the darkroom. Although I really enjoyed the photography aspect, I found it slightly frustrating that my pictures always seemed to be a pale imitation of what I had seen through the viewfinder, and as I progressed through higher education I concentrated on graphic design, rarely picking up a camera again.
After leaving education, I moved to Bath where I got my first design job working in a printers, moving to London a couple of years later where I began working as an in-house designer at various music and film labels. I had around fifteen very enjoyable, and probably slightly hedonistic years in the city, towards the end of which I started up my own business and got married. On a whim, we decided to move out of London, and based on nothing more than where I could get a mainline train back to the city for work we ended up living in the completely unfamiliar territory of East Anglia, in a small village on the border of Suffolk and Norfolk. I immediately felt reconnected to the countryside and realised how much I had missed it in all the years of living in the capital.
Youâve credited a workshop with kickstarting your serious interest in landscape photography, but said that the most important thing that you learnt from it was patience?
I picked up a camera again shortly after moving, wanting to try and capture the beauty of my new surroundings. The move from film to digital made a massive difference to me. Due my job I felt very comfortable working with digital files, and the ability to be able to see what I was shooting on an LCD meant I didnât have the same disappointment that always seemed to come when I processed a film, as I could recompose and reshoot until I got something I was happier with. My wife bought me a voucher for an afternoon group workshop with a local landscape photographer, Chris Herring, which provided a bit of an epiphany. Apart from the invaluable technical knowledge I gleaned, such as the use of filters and some compositional tips, the understanding of light was what really changed everything for me. Iâd obviously read all the magazines articles about its importance, but it was only when experiencing it in reality that the penny dropped.
We were at a windmill  (it was Norfolk, what do you expect?) and all set up on tripods having decided on our compositions. The weather was pretty changeable, and it started raining just after we got there. If I had been on my own, then undoubtedly I would have taken a few disappointing images, packed up and headed home. Chris pointed out a break in the clouds in the distance, and we waited for about 15 minutes under umbrellas as it got closer to the sun. When the light hit, the mill and foreground were suddenly illuminated against the dark skies and the whole scene completely changed. It only lasted for a few seconds, and I didn't even get a decent shot as Iâd moved my camera at the last minute, but the moment stayed with me ever since.
I realised then that the light was a huge factor, not just in photography, but in my connection with the landscape. Iâve always had a rush of elation from dramatic and interesting light and weather, but ridiculous as it sounds It had just never occurred to me that this was what I had really been wanting to capture all this time. Not just the sky and the big vistas, but the way it changes every detail of the landscape. These days I am constantly studying the sky, trying to predict what the light will do, where it will fall, and where I need to be to experience it, and when I am shooting I am more than happy to wait as long as it takes for the composition in front of me to evolve into something worth shooting.
How formative has the East Anglian landscape â and sky â been to your image making
Itâs been a hugely important factor in the direction my photography has taken. Itâs a very familiar feeling landscape to me, it's quite similar to the flat arable stomping grounds of my youth, but wound back about 50 years and with the benefit of being much nearer the coast. Being somewhere you donât really drive through to get somewhere else, its a bit of a time capsule in many ways. There are no motorways, and you could count the dual carriageways on the fingers of one hand (no six finger jokes please). FallingThe sudden demise of the textile industry here means that all the wealth suddenly dried up, and as a result, most of the rural areas are pretty much as they were a hundred years ago, and that really appeals to me. I vividly remember watching the BBCâs M.R. James Christmas ghost story adaptations when I was little, many of them were set here, and the landscape evokes the unsettling atmosphere which was really prominent in them, and Iâm often striving to try to portray this sense of unease in my photography.
Many of the traditional conventions of landscape photography are difficult to achieve in such a flat landscape; I love using a wide angle, but you would probably have to drive a hundred miles to find a vista with leading lines in the foreground, and some middle and background interest. This suits me fine though as I think it makes you work that much harder to find an image, and as a result leads you down your own path a little more. The big skies here are well known; itâs not that the skies are actually bigger or more interesting I donât think, its just that with the lack of elevation your field of vision is usually limited to the next hedgerow or slight slope, so the sky becomes much more prominent. Iâm sure many other local photographers would agree that the sky can really make or break an image here, as it often the dominant part of a shot. I often look at a scene as an inverted landscape shot, treating it as though it were a foreground, and try to find leading lines in the clouds to pull the eye down into an image.
Who (photographers, artists or individuals) or what has most inspired you, or driven you forward in your own development as a photographer?
I canât overstate the impact social media has had on my photography, initially Flickr, and latterly Twitter, has introduced me to the work of lots of great photographers, I often see people criticise a lot of current photography as being clichĂŠd and lacking in originality, but I think that the popularity and accessibility of digital photography and social media just means that there are just such a vast amount of incredibly good images being produced that it can seem that way
.Just because there are so many of them doesnât devalue them in my eyes, though. There are far too many photographers I greatly admire to list here: Colin Bell, Verity Milligan, Richard Thomas and Paul Mitchell locally to me Matthew Dartford, Jon Gibbs and Justin Minns have all been very influential... I could go on indefinitely, but in terms of those who have had the most impact on my photography then I would probably say Russ Barnes, David Baker and Mark Littlejohn. They all have that certain magic about their images which makes them recognisably their own, whatever the subject, and that greatly appeals to me.
What opportunities have you found that competition entry and success opened up for you? What advice would you give to those who are new to or have so far made little headway with competitions? How much of a focus should this be for aspiring photographers?
I think you need to be of a very particular mindset to enter photography competitions. On a daily basis, I read people bemoaning and criticising them, and getting very worked up about their successes and failures in them. I do believe that first and foremost, photography should be something you do for yourself, but having said that deep down I think we all crave some recognition for what we produce. Iâve been very lucky in them so far (and I am in no doubt that luck is a big factor) and had probably more than my fair share of success in them over the last two or three years, but I enter a lot of them and have also had plenty of complete failures. Iâm very pragmatic about them generally, if I do well then thatâs brilliant, but if I donât then I tend to forget about it pretty quickly. At the end of the day, they usually come down to the opinions of one or two judges. Your images either appeal to them, or they donât. If they donât then it doesnât in any way invalidate or diminish them, they just werenât what they were looking for at the time.
If you enter any competition with expectations of success, then you are setting yourself up for a fall, it doesnât matter how many people have praised your image or how pleased you are with it (and bear in mind nearly everybody who enters a competition will feel the same about their shots), it wonât appeal to everybody, and that may well include the judges.
If you are the kind of person who doesnât see this as rejection or will see it as an incentive to do better next time, then I would whole heartedly recommend entering them. They can be great for inspiring you to develop your photography, and itâs a great feeling to win a big photo competition. Successes for me have led to a lot of opportunities, leading workshops, tv, radio and magazine interviews, giving talks, commissions and lots more. I think the key thing is to just shoot what you want to shoot, though, that way competitions are a potential bonus, rather than an end in themselves.
How does your graphic design training influence your image making and presentation? Is it important to keep things simple?
My design training and experience over almost 30 years has undoubtedly had an impact on what I produce. Sensing what to put where in a composition comes pretty naturally to me now, much as it does in my job, so I think that helps when Iâm out shooting, and also helps when visualising what will work as an image. I spend most of my days working in Photoshop and know it inside out, but for photography I actually rarely use it, choosing to do most of my processing in Lightroom which makes it feel less like work. Although processing is a vital part of my photography, its by far the least enjoyable part for me.
I was interested to read that although your work would be considered by many to be creative, itâs photography that is your real creative outlet, as that was my experience too. To what extent does this influence where you want to take your photography?
I donât think its a coincidence that every other photographer I know seems to be a graphic designer or work in a similar field. Personally speaking its a very natural outlet for me to express my creativity without the constraints of commercial work. I think most of us who work in similar fields have a deep seated need to produce something, whether that be music, writing, paintings or photographs.
Although most people would see my job as being very creative, it's always within the boundaries of working to a brief, and not on something I would have chosen to do for purely personal reasons, so landscape photography offers me complete control over what I produce. I donât have to worry about shelf impact, the immediacy of the image, legal requirements, and most crucially, nobody else has any input. At work it doesnât matter how proud or pleased I am of something Iâve produced, if a client doesnât like it gets changed, whereas if somebody doesnât like one of my photographs, then, by all means, they can make comment or criticism, but itâs entirely up to me to listen and take heed, or disagree and stick to my instincts. I think this is fairly apparent in my photography; I quite often jump around stylistically and in the subjects I shoot. I might spend a month only shooting in the woods, or go to the same beach week after week. With no commercial constraints, I can just shoot whatever appeals to me at the time.
Which cameras and lenses do you go to as of choice and how do they affect your photography? Has this changed with time?
Iâm not very much of a gearhead (although the weight of my camera bag would probably disagree) and take little interest in new camera and lenses. When I am happy something does what I need it to do then Iâll happily stick with it until I break it, which usually isnât very long. My first DSLR was a Canon 60D, which I then upgraded to a 5Dmkii. I also have a 5Dmkii which is converted for infrared use. These have happily served my needs for the last few years and despite its limitations (which for me are the dynamic range and the lack of a tilt screen) Iâd still consider it a great camera. I bought a Sony A7R earlier this year though to give my aching back some respite, and although the mkii would be very nice, it more than meets my needs.
It has everything I need from a camera, great image quality, full frame and reasonably light. It has plenty of faults, mainly the battery life and completely incomprehensible menus, but as the only things I ever really change are the aperture, shutter speed and ISO then I can live with that. My go to lens is a Zeiss 18mm Distagon, which I still use on the Sony with an adaptor. Itâs a beautiful lens, built like a tank (it's been swimming on a few occasions), and undoubtedly the best investment Iâve made in terms of camera equipment. It perfectly suits my style and needs most of the time. I ought to switch it for the new Batis 18mm for the Sony to avoid messing around with adaptors, but Iâm just too reluctant to part with it so far. Many other ill-advised lens choices down the line, I now just carry a Zeiss 50mm and Sony 70-200 f/4. I miss the wider aperture of my old Canon f2.8 version so will probably add a suitable 100mm option at some point as I love wide apertures when shooting details and woodland.
Youâre a big advocate of manual focus?
Purely on a personal level really, what I want when taking pictures really is complete control, and manual focus is part of that. Itâs also something that slows me down, another thing that I find really beneficial. I often see people saying how liberating it is to ditch the tripod and heavy camera gear, but whenever I try that I usually come back disappointed. I use a heavy tripod with a geared head, and along with the manual focus it all makes me more considered when I press the shutter. I find it helps me examine the viewfinder or LCD much more closely. There are few things as disappointing as coming away with what you think is a great shot only to find you have a stray branch spoiling it or the focus is slightly off. Focussing manually makes me think about where the interest is, what I want to be sharp, what I donât. Obviously, there are times when autofocus is the better option, but its no coincidence that you would struggle to find a person in any of my shots; I ought to learn how to turn it back on really.
Can you choose 2-3 favourite images from your own portfolio and tell us a little about them?
At The Edges -Shortlisted: Outdoor Photographer of the Year 2014
I have mixed emotions about this shot. Itâs a couple of years old now, and I often wonder if it will be the best image Iâll ever take, which can be slightly demoralising. I feel it encapsulates everything I try to include in a photograph and is one of the only shots I look back on and still like as much now as I did when I took it. Part of that may come from the actual act of taking it. It was the first time I had visited Shingle Street in Suffolk, and it soon became my favourite location due to the eerie solitude of it, although its rare to visit without seeing another photographer there now. It was the morning before a huge storm and sea surge hit the area, and the brooding atmosphere was palpable from the moment I got out of the car. It was a wintry sunrise, and the colours were quite intense, and when the light hit the row of cottages it was one of those moments of elation that make the painfully early mornings worthwhile. Unusually for me, I didnât take the shot with black and white in mind. It was only a few months later when I actually tried it in mono that it really worked as I wanted it to, and I still remember the morning vividly whenever I see it.
Turmoil
I usually go through a pretty reliable timeline when it comes to my own images, which normally goes along the lines of initially I'll love it, then a few days later I like it, then Iâm not sure about it, before finally settling on hating it. This is usually either down to seeing how I could have improved it at the time, or just wondering what on earth I was thinking. I think this is probably quite common amongst photographers, though, and probably a very useful attitude to help you improve and evolve. So when I look back on a shot and still like it, then I find it quite satisfying. I enjoy making images from not very much, and Iâve stood on this beach countless times when there was no shot there, so its just a shot of the moment really. Having said that this one is fairly recent so, I might hate it by next week.
Hardship
Plucked for this one for a couple of reasons. Its pretty far out of my comfort zone, in both subject and location. It was taken in Snowdonia while helping out on a workshop with Greg Whitton. Unbeknown to each other we both took the same shot, almost down to the millimetre while we were wandering around in the breathtaking Dinorwic quarry workings, it was only when we got back to the hostel that Greg showed me the back of his camera. Mountains are his natural habitat, and nobody does them better in my opinion, and theyâre the polar opposite of what I am used to, so I was partly disappointed to see he also had what I thought was a really unique and original shot, and partly delighted that I had been able to see the potential that he had in such an alien environment for me. In terms of the actual image, I could look at the detail in it for hours; the more you look, the more you see, and to me, itâs quite different to my usual work. The light and conditions are pretty much irrelevant, its just a snippet of a place, but it has so many stories within it.
Tell me a little about your typical workflow and how much emphasis you place on post-processing?
My workflow is disorganised at best. I usually get the images off camera pretty quickly when I get back, highlight a couple to process, then the rest just get swallowed up into my bloated library of unlooked at shots. I occasionally have a look through and come across whole shoots that I was really pleased with at the time and have never even taken an image from. The actual processing is a vital but annoying part of the process for me. I donât really have much interest in taking literal representations of the landscape, so I usually try to put my own stamp on things. As I touched on earlier, I try to evoke some emotion in my images, whether it be unease, nostalgia, drama, etc. This is often something that only really comes to life in the processing.
Iâve usually visualised what I am trying to achieve as a final image when shooting, and compose and expose accordingly, then its just a case of trying to translate that in the processing. Sometimes that will involve very little, and sometimes a fair bit of work, but usually just involves some dodging and burning, and playing with colour balance or split toning.
How important is it to you that your images become prints?
Even though I print quite a lot, its still not often enough really. I think printing an image adds validity to it in many ways. Although I upload to Flickr and the like, social media is so transient that if you shoot a lot, as I do, lots of your images soon disappear into the ether. Having them in print provides a more tangible end to the whole process. When composing or processing a shot, I consider every tiny detail and, often discard images based on what is really very little or spend inordinate amounts of time getting something just right. When you put them online, they are looked at, most likely very small on a phone, maybe appreciated by somebody for a few seconds if youâre lucky and then swiped away for the next one. Having them in print allows you, and maybe others, to really look at them. Itâs a much more fitting end to all that work and thought that went into them, and Iâd heartily recommend anybody who doesnât to print their images to close the circle on the process.
Do you have any particular plans, projects or ambitions for the future?
Iâve got two young boys, so have been pretty limited in how far and often I can travel for the last few years, so now they are reaching school age Iâll hopefully be able to make a few trips further afield to explore some new landscapes. I love my adopted home of East Anglia, but I do crave a rocky beach and a few hills now and again. I vaguely have a couple of ongoing photographic projects, which I sporadically add to, but in the main, I just shoot whatever is appealing to me at the time.
If you had to take a break from all things photographic for a week, what would you end up doing?
Since moving back to the countryside I start to climb the walls if Iâm stuck indoors for more than a day or two, so I would probably spend it gardening which I really enjoy. Itâs just another creative outlet in a way, and also gives me that connection with nature and the outdoors. It also tells me Iâm turning into my father.
Which photographerâ amateur or professional - would you like to see featured in a future issue?
Other than the ones Iâve mentioned already, many of whom have either featured or been suggested, I think, Iâd like to see Damian Taylor who always seems to produce something original and creative, or David Hopley whoâs doing some really interesting work with drone photography.
Onlandscape Conference 2016
[et_pb_section admin_label=âsectionâ][et_pb_row admin_label=ârowâ][et_pb_column type=â4_4âł][et_pb_image admin_label=âImageâ src=âhttp://www.alastairrossphotography.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/on-landscape-conference.jpg” show_in_lightbox=âoffâ url_new_window=âoffâ use_overlay=âoffâ animation=âoffâ sticky=âoffâ align=âcenterâ force_fullwidth=âoffâ always_center_on_mobile=âonââŚ
View On WordPress
Photography Project #2
Seeing the web world expand and those images show the connection between photography and social media. Itâs social media vs photography: if good or evil is up to you.
(c) images by me
Based on the article from the online magazine for landscape photographers: here