(ΛΆ>β©<ΛΆ) NORMALQUEER &/OR QUEERNORMAL πππΊ
A COMBINATION OF RADNORMAL & RADQUEER!!!!!!
"BUT HOW COULD YOU IDENTIFY AS BOTH? RADNORMAL AND RADQUEER ARE OPPOSITES! (β¬ ΓοΉΓ)"
ACTUALLY, THEY AREN'T AS DIFFERENT AS YOU THINK! HERE'S SOME THINGS THEY AGREE ON:
β€οΈ THERIANTHROPY, OTHERKIN, NONHUMANS, & MORE!
β€οΈ "CONTRADICTORY" LABELS!
β€οΈ NEUTRAL STANCE ON HARASSMENT/PRO-CONSEQUENCES!
ALTHOUGH THERE IS STILL A LOTS THAT IS "DISAGREED ON" BY EITHER:
π SHIPCOURSE.
π NON-TRAUMAGENIC SYSTEMS.
π PARAPHILIAS AND CONTACT STANCES.
π TRANSIDENTITTIES.
π BIGOTRY.
SO... HERE'S WHY I IDENTIFY AS BOTH RADNORMAL AND RADQUEER!!!:
1IRSTLY, I AGREE WITH THE THINGS THAT BOTH STANCES AGREE ON. I BELIEVE IN IDENTIFYING BASICALLY HOWEVER ANYLIFE WANTS TO, EVEN IF WE'RE UNFORTUNATELY CHAINED TO THE CURRENT LIFE, WITH NO ABILITY TO TRANSITION THINGS LIKE SPECIES.
LANGUAGE IS TO BE USED HOW LIFE WANTS TO, WHETHER THAN MEANS BEING A LESBOY, BI-GAY, OR WHATEVER ELSE. MAYBE SOMELIFE CHOOSE PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE, BUT IT'S ABOUT THE FEELINGS BEHIND IT, & EVEN BAD FAITH USE IS AN EXPLORATION OF IDENTITY THAT DESERVES ROOM TO BE EXPLORED [PROBABLY AWAY FROM ANYLIFE THAT COULD BE OFFENDED].
HARASSMENT IS A COMMON STATE OF LIFE ON THE INTERNET, & COMMONLY OCCURS AS A CONSEQUENCE FOR A LIFE'S ACTIONS. UNJUST, NON-CONSENSUAL HARASSMENT IS EASY TO DISMISS AS BAD, BUT OFTENTIMES THE "VICTIMS" WILL LEAN ON THE PART OF IT BEING NON-CONSENSUAL, WHEN THE HARASSMENT IS TOTALLY JUSTIFIED!
2ECONDLY, I AM SOMETHING OF A CENTRIST... THAT MEANS I UNDERSTAND A BIT OF BOTH OF THESE SIDES, MAKING THE CONFLICTING DIFFERENCE OF BOTH RADQUEER AND RADNORMAL MAKE TOTAL SENSE TO MIE.
BOTH ANTISHIP AND PROSHIP SIDES MAKE GOOD POINTS, ABOUT HOW DARK MEDIA SHOULD BE HANDLED WITH CARE, & HOW DARK MEDIA SHOULD NOT BE CENSORED. THERE'S ACTUALLY A LOT OF NUANCES INTO IT!!!
I GENERALLY PREFER TO ACCEPT WHAT ANYLIFE SAYS, WHETHER IT IS THE REAL TRUTH, THEIR TRUTH, OR A LIE. I SEE IT AS A FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION THING, EVEN IF THERE IS CRITICISM TO BE HAD.
UUU PARAPHILIA IS A TOUCHY 1NE, BECAUSE I AM A PARAPHILE. IT FEELS LIKE RADQUEERS BLINDLY ACCEPT ALL PARAPHILIA, EVEN SOMELIVES ACCEPTING ALL CONTACT [STANCES], WHILE RADNORMALS DEAFLY CONDEMN ALL PARAPHILIA, EVEN DOWN TO HOW THEY COPE WITH IT. I THINK IT VARIES PER PARAPHILIA, PER COPING MECHANISM, PER LIFE, & SO ON. NUANCE!!!!
THE DIVIDE BETWEEN TRANSIDENTITTIES COMES FROM RADQUEERS ACCEPTING ALL TRANSIDENTITTIES, & RADNORMALS HAVING "GOOD FAITH TRANSIDENTITTIES" ON THIN ICE. AS I SAID EARLIER, I BELIEVE LANGUAGE IS TO BE USED HOW LIFE WANTS TO, & THE "CHAINED TO THE CURRENT LIFE" GOES FOR RACE, ETHNICITY, SOME DISABILITIES/DISORDERS, NOT HAVING DISABILITIES/DISORDERS, & MORE. THE FEELING IS WHAT I AGREE WITH, EVEN IF TRANSITION IS IMPOSSIBLE.
IT MAY BE EASY TO RULE OF BIGOTRY, HARM IN GENERAL, FOR THE... WELL, HARM IT CAUSES. JUST AS EASILY, LIFE MAY JUSTIFY BIGOTRY BY SAYING IT'S FREE SPEECH. MIY OPINION IS THAT EVERYLIFE NEEDS TO EXPERIENCE HARM TO KNOW WHAT TRUE ACCEPTANCE FEELS LIKE, AND THAT GOES FOR BEING HARMFUL TOO.
SOO, I HOPE THAT GETS MIY POINT ACROSS! (β‘ΛΝ κ³ ΛΝ) IF NOT, FEEL FREE TO SEND MIE AN ASK ABOUT ANYTHING I CAN ANSWER.
RADQUEERNORMAL & RADNORMALQUEER COINING
