#naranjo

ღ symbol means less common and the existence is debatable

However, just because an mbti isn't listed under a specific enneagram subtype, doesn't mean the combination is impossible. Correlations are extrmely subjective depending on which author you trust. For example, Naranjo's description of the subtypes is quite specific with little room for ambiguity, so only a few mbti types fit.

if you are curious if a certain correlation exists, it is better to evaulate the mbti and enneagram type separately

I will list the correlations based on Naranjo's description. This is my take so it may be inaccurate

I don't recommend typing by correlation but knowing the patterns is helpful

*ೃ༄Enneagram 1.ೃ࿐

Social 1: ESTJ, ENTJ

Self preservation 1: ESTJ, ISTJ, ENTJ, xxFJღ

Sexual 1: ESTJ, ENTJ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 2.ೃ࿐

Social 2: ENFJ, ESFJ

Self preservation 2: ESFJ, ESFP, ENFP

Sexual 2: ESFJ, ESFP, ENFxღ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 3.ೃ࿐

Social 3: ENTJ, ESTJ

Self preservation 3: ESTJ, ENTJ, IxTJ ღ

Sexual 3: ESFJ, ENFJ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 4.ೃ࿐

Social 4: INFP, ISFP, INFJღ

Self preservation four: ISFP, INFJ, INFP

Sexual 4: ISFP, INFP, ExFP

*ೃ༄Enneagram 5.ೃ࿐

Social 5: INTJ, INTP

Self preservation 5: INTJ, ISTJ, INTP

Sexual 5: INFJ, INTJ, INxPღ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 6.ೃ࿐

Social 6: INTP, ISTP, IxTJღ

Self preservation 6: INFP, INFJ, INTPღ

Sexual six: ISTP, ENTJ ღ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 7.ೃ࿐

Social 7: ENTP, ENFP ღ, ENxJღ

Self preservation 7: ENTP

Sexual 7: ENFP, ENTP ღ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 8.ೃ࿐

Social 8: ESTP, ESFP

Self preservation 8: ESTP

Sexual 8: ESFP, ESTPღ

*ೃ༄Enneagram 9.ೃ࿐

Social 9: ESFJ, ISFJ

Self preservation 9: ISTJ, ISTP

Sexual 9: ISFJ, ESFJ

*ೃ༄Misconceptions of combos.ೃ࿐

Sp1 mbti archetype is ISTJ/ISFJ: Sp1 pretty much is an archetypical Te user if you read the book. Dismissing feelings, priotizing stabiltiy, efficiency, objectivity, etc. People think Sp1 is ISTJ purely because of stereotypes of being a less aggressive workaholic.

So6 archetype is ISTJ: one of the biggest misconceptions that I used to believe in was that So6 archetype was ISTJ. I now realized that it was purely based on stereotypes. On the surface, a type who can become dogmatic and attaches to a set of beliefs to feel secure seems like Si-Te, but this type is heavily abstract, even disconnected from its body and sensations (archetypically). This often makes So6 get mistyped as So5s.

e5 archetype is INTP. Actually, e5s have a more abstract view of the world, unlike 6s who view the world through objectivity and logical consistency. e5s embody the irrational functon IN/Ni more, and their Se inferior lies in the desire to not live in the present fully and withdraw from the physical world.

Sp7 archetype is ESTP: I actually don't believe in the existence of Se dom e7. Now, people will chew me out for being a hyper-strict correlationist, but the thing is, the core trait of the e7 is lacking in realism and not being grounded to reality, which contradicts Se, a function that percieves reality as it is. All the types suffer from the need to fantasize and seek a world that is not the current reality, to formulate plans and ideals to escape pain and frustrations. While Sp7 certainly is a more anti-idealistic and dry type, it still is an Ne dom, as it actively seeks for opportunities and possibilities.

So7 archetype is ENFP: when we think of a type that is highly agreeable, altrusitic, and witty, we think of IEE ENFP, but the truth is, the So7 is highly disconnected from their own feelings and is a much more rational type, which fits ENTP and Fi PoLR than ENFP.

Sp9 archetype is ISTP: overall, the Sp9 behavior aligns more with Si than Ti. We like to think that ISTJ is not the archetype because ISTJs = hardworking and dutiful, while the Sp9 is often depicted as being lazy. The Sp9's neurosis surrounds being attached to comfort, routines, lifestyle, and being hesitant with too much change (hence psychological inertia), which fits much better with Si than Ti,

*ೃ༄Combinations that are often mistyped (though not always impossible.ೃ࿐

ENTJ e8 -> ENTJ Sx1, ENTJ So3, ENTJ Sx6

Explanation: Most of the "ENTJs want to control the environment" aligns more with Sx1's desire to reform imperfection than the lust of the e8. e8s are also generally less inquisitve and care less about symbolism, abstractionism, etc, which makes aux Ni. a type difficult to be e8.

Examples: Stalin (ENTJ Sp8 -> Sx6), Napoleon (ENTJ So8 -> So3), Gordon Ramsey (ESTJ Sx8 -> Sx1)

IxFP e1 -> IxFP Sp4 (or Sx4)

Explanation: Sp4s often feel the need to aim for righteousness and perfectionism. They may feel a need to be morally good, but lack the anger sin that makes up the e1

Examples: Zuko (ISFP Sp1 -> Sx4), Elsa (INFJ Sp1 -> Sp4)

ExTJ Sx3 -> ExFx Sx2

Explanation: Sx3 is generally an archetypical Fe user. I've seen many people who are interested in one-on-one relationships and also desire success to be typed as Sx3. Sx3 is a very chamelonic, accomodating, and actively insecure type, which often goes against these characters

Examples: Regina George (ESTJ Sx3 -> ESFJ So2), Mother Gothel (ESTJ Sx3 -> ESFJ Sx2)

ExFP e3 -> ExFP Sx4, Sx8, or Sx2

Explanation: ambitious ExFPs are often typed as this. I will say, vanity usually goes against Fi as a whole as vanity is a disconnection with one's true identity and emotions.

Examples: Syndrome (ENFP So3 -> Sx4), Naruto (ESFP So3 -> Sx8), Achilles (song of achilles) (ESFP Sx3 -> So8)

INTJ e4 -> INTJ Sx5

Explanation: Sx5 is a much more emotional subtype than regular 5s, so INTJs who believe they are more in tune with their emotions often type themselves as this. I'd say most of the time the e4 is a higher feeler mbti type

EnxP So6 -> ENxP So7

Explanation: this is what happens when you type instinctual variant separately from the enneagram type. So6 is a very rigid, rule-oriented, type, contradictory to Ne doms. Oftentimes Ne doms who are percieved as being more responsible are typed as this. I believe these types are social 7s, who act anti indulgent but are still gluttons

Examples: Peter Parker (ENFP So6 -> So7), Phoniex Wright (ENTP So6 -> So7)

ISTP Sp8 -> ISTP Sx6 or ISFP Sx4

Explanation: Just because someone is a quiet badass, doesn't mean they are a ISTP Sp8. This combination is possible, in my opinion, but often mistyped

Examples: Darth Maul (ISTP Sp8 -> ISFP Sx4), Megara (ISTP 8w9 -> Sx6)

ExFP So8 -> xxFP Sx4/Sx2

Explanation: a lot of the passionate, strong, and direct ExFP characters get typed as 8s due do their assertive nature. However, it is important to evaluate the character's core desires before typing based on behaviors. ESFP 8 is obviously a very common type, but it is often mistyped too.

I think strict correlationists are stupid. There. I said it. ESPECIALLY when it comes to people who believe Naranjos word is holy and 100% true, even Beatrice Chestnut correlationists are pushing it (yes, I’ve read her book.). There are UNLIMITED possibilities and even according to Naranjo himself, enneagram is partially based on your childhood traumas while your cognitive functions are not. I’m an ENTP, and while I struggled to find my enneagram for a long time because of correlations I came to the conclusion I’m a sx6, although I mistyped as a sx3 for a while which is still highly debated as it as by correlationists simply because I’m still in school and I’m very driven by academic validation from my teachers, especially in university courses.

All enneagrams should be possible, just rarer or more common. An infp e8 would definitely be a sight to see but it’s not impossible, maybe just 1 in a thousand. Personally, if it weren’t for my childhood trauma and intense abandonment issues that stemmed from my loneliness/bullying and NEED to be safe and secure thanks to the abuse I endured, I probably would’ve been the ENTP archetype as an e7. Not to mention I also have OCD which Naranjo HIMSELF states has a correlation to e6.

🧡

A veces también me pongo serio 😌

#TheHoodedMan #PeterGundry #DesignYourUniverse #BlackMusou #FreeYourself #He #Him

https://x.com/_XtianHarvey_ 🪄😄