#mysogyny

Misandrists don't make telegram groups to share revenge porn and non-consentual nudes of men. but Misogynists do that to women.

Misandrists don't make deepfake porn to defame, humiliate and torture men. but Misogynists do that to women.

Misandrists don't pass laws to take away men's reproductive rights. but misogynists do that with women's reproductive rights.

Misandrist don't go out of their way to stalk, target, harass and assault men. but misogynists do that to women.

Misandrists don't make religion or interpret religious texts to control, shame and chain men. but misogynists do that to women.

Misandrists don't see men as sex objects or act entitled to their bodies. but misogynists do that with women.

Misandry has never caused sex-selective abortions. but misogyny is the reason why sex determination of fetuses is banned in many countries because of Female foeticide and preference for sons.

Misandry has never caused the importances of a field of work go down if male participation increases. but misogyny is why nursing, teaching and modeling is looked down on and ridiculed because it's a female dominated field. misogyny is one of the reason why going to college is now looked down on because more college grads are women.

Misandry hasn't caused medical field to not research on men and their health problems or made health care providers deminish/invalidate their pain. but misogyny has such a major impact on medical field that to still date we don't know the exact cause of fibroids. A "benign tumor" that varies in size, from tiny to as large as a MELON, and can cause heavy bleeding, pelvic pain, etc. Something that between 20 to 80 percent of women have. but oh that just lil bit of pain and discomfort right? nothing that serious?

and again it's totally not because of misogyny we still don't know the exact cause of endometriosis and the fact that the largest research on it is how it affects the MALE partner of the women that have endometriosis. NOT about how the WOMEN feels, NOT about how it affects her but how it affects her MALE PARTNER.

And they gave that to Kara. She never cries, she sheds one tear. Each time, a single one.

The ambassadors of the centrist manosphere praise women’s advancement and the feminist cause while insisting that men’s economic and vocational anxieties are more naturally potent. This ambivalence reveals the weakness of their side. The right-wing manosphere knows that masculinity is a series of dominance signals beamed from behind iridescent Oakleys and the wheel of the most enormous pickup truck you’ve ever seen; it is a smirking multimillionaire who “DESTROYS” a young woman at a college-hosted debate; it is—must it be said?—an AR-15, openly carried. Manliness in the Trump era, Susan Faludi has written, “is defined by display value,” which exhibits itself in a “pantomime of aggrieved aggression.” Upon this stage, men’s biggest problem is feminism, and the solutions are straightforward: restrict reproductive rights, propagandize about traditional gender roles, etc. The squishier centrist side has no such certainties. Galloway, in both his podcasts and “Notes on Being a Man,” presents masculinity not as one side of a fixed binary but as a state of mind and a life style, one equally available to men and women, and therefore impossible to define. (It’s a feeling, and we know how Trump supporters feel about those.) Within this amorphous framework, men’s biggest problem is, likewise, a feeling—an unreachable itch, or a marrow-deep belief—that men should still rank above women in the social hierarchy, just not as much as before. This belief may be misguided or unconscious, but it is nonetheless insuperable, and it must be accommodated, for the good of us all. What these pundits are nudging us to do, ever so politely, is accept that women, in the main, are accustomed to being a little degraded, a little underpaid and ignored and dampened in their ambitions, in ways that men are not and never will be. The “female-coded” person, to borrow Krugman’s terminology, may feel overwhelmed by child-care costs, ashamed that she can’t acquire a mortgage, or hollowed out by long hours as an I.C.U. nurse, but such feelings do not disturb the order of the universe. This person’s duties to protect, provide, and procreate are real, but they do not take the capital “P.” This person’s opinions matter, but not decisively. The Times pundit Ezra Klein has lately suggested that Democrats consider running anti-abortion candidates in red states, even though more than three-quarters of Gen Z women support abortion rights. Rights, like jobs, can be gender-coded, and these rights are valued accordingly.