#myreplies

hiiii yeah, I’m doing good! how bout you?

thank you so much anon, i really appreciate it!

honestly for brows you cannot go wrong with @alf-si, @blahberry-pancake, @obscurus-sims and @pralinesims. they’re definitely who i use the most!

and for skin overlays i would recommend checking out also @pralinesims, @obscurus-sims, @sims3melancholic and @ddarkstonee. 

Hi there! Hmmm. Let's see. There are some characters who made progression in the show. Correct me if i am wrong, my gx memory is kinda blurry. I am listing below as my top 3 characters to look forward to:

1. JADEN. OBVIOUSLY the protag got the most character development in the show. You can see how a funny, happy go lucky duelist from season turn to an emo serious looking guy in s3/s4; how he see the dueslist in him, etc. He has experienced defeats to, so yeah.

2. CHAZZ. This dork. I can see his progression in the show too. He started out as a stereotypical dork, but you can also see in him as an improving duelist. He has his own moment in the season

3. ASTER. PERSONAL FAVE. When i saw him, in the show, for the first time, he was like, the aura of a pro-duelist. Also, i love his deck, he beats jaden, and he's cool. Haha.

Overall, i have a thing for yugioh girls. Not just because i am a gal, but they are quite forgotten in the show by most, maybe? Haha. Overall, I am really biased with Alexis. Her deck is my fave and how she stands out like as a woman duelist in the gang. Also, jaden x alexis tag duels is what i rewatched most.

Right? She showed up at Crowley’s office with so much bravado, trying to humiliate him into debating her on the spot, but when Ben Shapiro offers online to debate her for charity at a time and place of her choice, that was unsolicited catcalling and a man full of entitlement… Did you also see her try to be a good ally to Hamas, condemning Israel for their “massacres” and “the occupation of Palestine”? When she was asked to clarify what she meant, she completely fell apart, retreated from her statements and admitted she doesn’t really know what she’s talking about. How can someone know so little about a topic yet be so passionate about it? She’s also called for the abolishment of ICE, prompting many other Democrats to campaign on ridding the country of immigration law enforcement. But still, none of this compares to her socialist agenda.

In her interview with Trevor Noah, the very anti-Trump talkshow host, she was asked to explain how the United States would pay for all of the entitlements she has campaigned on including fully taxpayer-funded Medicare, college tuition and housing. No different to any other socialist, she replied it’s possible “if the wealthy paid their fair share.” She went on to proudly state that if we raised the hell out of taxes on corporations and the ultra wealthy, over a ten year period the government could make two trillion dollars. Considering providing Medicare for all would cost the federal government 32 trillion dollars over the same length of time and free college tuition would cost 75 billion per year, her math doesn’t quite add up. That’s not even including her free housing, free childcare and an increase in entitlement programs she’s calling for. Her other bright idea to pay for socialism is to take money from the military, because “they don’t need it.”

This is the problem with socialism. It’s all whimsical, pie in the sky economics. They go on and on about the evil “1 percent” but even if we took 100 percent of the wealth from America’s richest people, we’d only be able to run a free-for-all socialist government for about four months. The combined wealth of all our multimillionaires and billionaires, everyone in Forbes Richest 400, we’d reap 2.68 trillion. That sounds like a lot, sure, but we already spend almost double that per year, without the endless welfare programs. That sum couldn’t even fund universal healthcare for a single year, let alone even scratch the surface of our 20 trillion national debt or the combined spending of every other socialist program. The question that no socialist can answer is what happens after we take the money from the rich? They all want to play Robin Hood and steal from the rich, but what then? What happens when that money quickly runs out?

Taking all the wealth from the rich is the exact same idea as simply printing out trillions of dollars more and handing it out to everyone. Their goal is to make everyone equally rich, but if everyone is rich then the value of money becomes worthless, making everyone equally poor. And if we take away all the money, who then will be our entrepreneurs, job creators and pioneers? People won’t work if there’s no incentive, if they’re not allowed to profit or excel individually. How do we make people work if they know they’ll still be paid and provided for regardless if they work or not? But that’s all part of the socialist ideology, they believe in a communal state, where everyone works for free, everyone shares everything, nothing is owned, it’s all for the good of mankind and equality.

That’s why she’s so popular with young liberals, they live and breathe for this utopia, their teachers have been indoctrinating them for the past twenty years, so of course they will flock to vote for a brown and female version of Bernie, but her ideas and her clear failure to sell them will never be able to convince the rest of America to get on board. And why would they? The great GDP numbers are just the latest positive example of what has been an objectively successful economy under Trump. Since taking office, the Dow has gone from 18,332 to 25,503. The Nasdaq has gained almost 3,000 points, and the S&P is up just shy of 800. Our national unemployment rate is at an 18-year low of 3.8 percent. Among black, Hispanic and Asian Americans, unemployment is at all-time low numbers. Trump has slashed red tape at a record rate, consumer confidence is through the roof and we have more available jobs than unemployed people.

She even fumbled with answers related to the low unemployment rate, stating it was so low “due to Americans working two or more jobs.” However the number of Americans working two or more jobs has been on the decline since the mid-90s and sits under 5 percent of all people employed today. Another common assertion is that people are working “60, 70, 80 hours a week to feed their families.” In fact, we’re working less today than ever. The average number of hours worked is about 34.5 hours. Liberals always use tiny percentages to justify their policies: 1 percent of abortions are due to rape or incest so we must make abortion legal for all. Less than 1 percent of people are transgender, so we must make it a law to force people to pretend men are women and women are men. Just because 4 percent of people work two jobs with long hours, it doesn’t mean we should all welcome Marxism and socialism into America.