Asexuality and aromanticism being a spectrum make them even less queer. âWhat if a cishet didnât feel romantic attraction as often as other cishetsâ well then I simply wouldnât care
Do you realize how garbage it is to base What Is Queer & What Isn't off of that logic?
Many multisexual people have spectrums of attraction. Like, some are more attracted to transgender people than cisgender people, are more attracted to feminine genders than masculine genders, or have different standards of attraction for different genders.
Would you look at that, another queer spectrum?
And, while we're at it: queer has many definitions, absolutely, and one of them is "anything that goes against societal norms of gender and sexuality" (how do you be "less queer" with that as a definition, by the way?)
Also, not every culture prioritizes putting a word to every feeling, but neither to have nor to not have is a bad thing. Labels are very individualistic, and can be adopted by anybody who feels seen by them, even if they are cisgender and/or heterosexual. In fact, we need more cishet people to feel comfortable being non-conforming. Fuck "Us Versus Them."
Y'know, anon, I think you should really commit to the "simply wouldn't care" bit. I think that would do you some good. If you agree with Joanne K. Rowling that asexuals and aromantics are fake, then... go? away? đ
Because you know what you sound like?
Hey guys, I simply do not care for bananas! I don't understand why they are a fruit when they are so gross, and to me, a fruit is tasty!
