author: Michael Anthony Moya ©| @miqaelochristos-edicto
hermeneutic analysis and scientific fundamentalization of "a scientific miracle
If a miracle were to occur—a fusion between the advancements of modern science, with its immense specialization in the storage of experimental detail, and the knowledge that now seems almost magical to us, belonging to the civilizations of antiquity, capable of relating, encompassing, predicting, and, in a purely symbolic manner, representing a countless number of values under a single sign—
the advancements humanity would witness in a single year would be enough to synthesize and bind together all that man has created:
—to a single end, to a single purpose, and, in the second instance, to ascend to the next rung of his physiological and spiritual evolution.
—Well done! Science has given us a good push!
If I were now to place a marvelous example that would set us at the gates of this case, I would do so using the monadist philosophy of Leibniz (who posits a kind of sacred geometry, a pre-established order in nature), relating it to the spiritual world of ancient knowledge.
We know well that, genetically, a family of warrior lineage shares, in detail, certain specific information—a recurring numerical pattern. On the individual level, such a pattern is added to other "random" genes, and to those which, according to the individual’s disposition throughout life, are "added". In sum, a man bears the familial mark, modified by his individuality.
—Of course, we would lose sight of the "purpose" if we attempted to account for every detail of each person’s informational patterns.
For now, the scientific purpose—and that of the modern species—should begin to dissolve, and this is what the progress in quantum physics will imply in its upcoming assimilation by science, as well as by the general population: to this point concerns its task as a modern patriarchal and moral-intellectual era.
From an ontological and metaphysical (spiritual) perspective, each family that shares a similar genetic order—similar in the sense that, to continue using our example, produces warrior types as a common denominator within the hierarchical harmony of Nature—is named with an archetypal category: that of the Warrior. And it is this archetype that the ancients proposed in their mythologies, just as, later on, astrology would adopt it.
Hermeneutic analysis and scientific fundamentalization of
"a scientific miracle"
1—The fragment under analysis proposes a speculative yet structurally coherent reflection on the reconciliation of two epistemic regimes: the hyper-specialized empiricism of modern science and the symbolically saturated, integrative knowledge of antiquity. This hypothetical "miracle" is less an event than a philosophical axiom, positing the fusion of diachronic intellectual developments as the necessary prelude to the next evolutionary stage of human existence.
2—At the core of this theory lies an implicit critique of the fragmentation inherent to contemporary scientific methodologies. The text identifies the accumulation of isolated data points as an achievement of technical prowess, yet insufficient for existential comprehension. Conversely, it valorizes ancient knowledge for its capacity to synthesize multiplicities under symbolic unities, suggesting a cognitive architecture where signs operate both as representatives and condensers of meaning. This recalls semiotic theories derived from structural linguistics, where signs are understood as nodes of both difference and synthesis.
3—The reference to Leibniz’s monadology introduces a metaphysical bridge between modern informational systems and pre-modern cosmologies. Leibniz’s monads, as indivisible, metaphysically loaded substances that reflect the entire universe from their singular perspective, function here as an allegory for both genetic inheritance and archetypal categorization. The text subtly aligns the monad’s reflective totality with the transmission of genetic "numerical patterns," suggesting that individual identity is a tension between inherited archetypes and experiential modifications.
4—The genetic example provided—where families of "warrior lineage" share specific informational patterns—demonstrates a conceptual unification of biological determinism and symbolic anthropology. The suggestion that archetypes underlie and inform the material manifestation of beings echoes the Platonic assertion of transcendent forms, as well as Carl Jung’s analytical psychology, which reintroduced archetypes as collective unconscious structures.
5—The argument culminates in a prospective philosophical pivot: the dissolution of the current scientific teleology under the pressures exerted by quantum mechanics and the impending transformation of epistemology itself. The text implies that modern science, still anchored in a patriarchal and moral-intellectual era, approaches a moment of conceptual exhaustion. The quantum paradigm, with its challenge to classical causality, linear temporality, and observer-independent objectivity, is envisioned as the first breach in the materialist framework, making room for an ontological revision that would restore the unifying symbolic logic of ancient thought.
this text outlines a theoretical model wherein human evolution—physiological and spiritual—is contingent upon the integration of empirical rigor and symbolic totality. It implicitly proposes that meaning and knowledge, long divorced by the scientific revolution, will require reunification for humanity to transcend its current epistemic plateau. The narrative style oscillates between metaphysical idealism and scientific realism, producing a dialectical tension that enriches, rather than resolves, the underlying theory.
