"Ceramic Computer" by Ma Jun ⬣ Ming-style patterns reimagine desktop hardware
seen from Tajikistan

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Maldives
seen from United States

seen from Yemen

seen from United States

seen from Norway
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from Italy
seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia
"Ceramic Computer" by Ma Jun ⬣ Ming-style patterns reimagine desktop hardware

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Enjoy media again
This is a bit of a long one, but if you want to change your relationship to technology in a manageable but effective way, you might find this interesting.
Over the past year or so, I’ve realized how exhausting technology has become. I’m a Millennial, so I grew up with CDs and VHS/DVDs. I was attached to the hip with my iPod and I have fond memories of browsing video stores to pick something for family movie night.
Then came smartphones, and streaming. And I was happy with both for years, until I realized:
I hate my phone. And I hate streaming. And I hate, more generally, what modern technology has evolved into.
microwave popcorn scares me
what do you mean when I take this thing out it is hot to the touch and wants to explode at me
I swear it has a personal grudge against me
let us go back to Ancient Greece when things were so much simpler 🙏
please
I've been thinking and realised I like the idea of old tech more than old tech itself. As late as the 2000s we still relied on mechanical things and bobs and tiny whirring motors making for a more sensual experience overall. We were granted a completely different flavour of eye candy that was not afraid to show off complexity while still wanting to strike a balance with ease of use. Since the tech was less capable, companies can't simply shove tiny chips doing all the work in a giant plastic thing, also leading to old devices more likely to get the Tech Brick feel. And, as the tech was still new, companies were more willing to experiment with weird forms in an attempt to come up with a hit paradigm.
However, I also like my devices nice and undamaged, which is not a given with used goods (especially as many of the old electronics at home are damaged because younger me was a monster). On a more practical note, even without cosmetic damage I have to deal with natural degradation eg. battery aging, broken mechanics, failing flash memory. Also, obsolescence is real and as the market moves away from old methods and technologies things just stop working well with old tech no matter how much autism (affectionate, shout-out to the FOSS dev community) one throws at the problem (i386 and under 4GiB RAM are no longer bearable to use for the web) because unlike wealth, performance trickles down, and there is little incentive to build for old things especially when the new methods are simply more performant (graphics performance, auto white balance, sensor resolution, battery life).
Essentially, old devices are, if not special artifacts, essentially life forms that one needs to care for, for better or for worse. One does not necessarily get to repair or replace these things because nobody makes them anymore. It makes itself known, as opposed to new tech which is streamlined enough to be able to just disappear as a utility and where everyone seems to just be rallying behind Apple (fuck you Jony Ive btw) and the cloud instead of doing interesting things. By all intents our do weird things capability should have gone up given how much more advanced tech is now.
T3TRA Loudspeakers by Alienology. Unique tetrahedral design improves clarity by reducing standing waves and edge diffraction. SLS 3D printed frame with laser-cut birch plywood panels. Produced on-demand in Los Angeles.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
---
Lena "Tracer" Oxton (Overwatch) Stimboard
"Blinkity-blinkity! Tracer's here! Yeah!"
Credits: x x x | x x x | x x x
So what I find really interesting is how I absolutely hate current AI, but how much I love fictional robots/artificial intelligence. Every time the issue, "Can robots feel?" Is brought up in any kind of fictional media, I always firmly believe that they can. Just because they are not human doesn't mean they can't create and experience things. So why don't I feel this way about Chat GPT? I mean, it's an AI. Let's use Data from Star Trek as an example. He's a robot that is deemed incapable of human emotions, yet he still seems to simulate such emotions. He paints quite a bit, and I love all his art. However, when Chat GPT "paints," I hate it. It's stolen art. But Data kind of does the same thing, using vast amounts of previous examples to create something new. Both are AI that supposedly can't feel, but simulate human emotions and traits. SO WHAT TRULY IS THE DIFFERENCE? Is it because Data is more humanoid? That he uses a brush instead of a screen? Mabye, but probably not. Other examples of fictional AIs without a body make things on screen, and I still love it. So I don't know. I don't know why I feel like this. All I know is that I don't like Chat GPT or what it stands for. However, there is a small part of me scared to hate modern AI. Because what if I'm wrong and it can feel in some sort of strang way. Mabye it can't think like us, but perhaps it CAN think. I doubt this is the case, but still. Im scared how apathetic I am towards these AIs. Because what if one day we get robots that can think, and I become one of the people dismissing them instead of accepting them. This is just something I think about a lot lol