Hi! I recently stumbled across your account and have really been enjoying your posts. Itās refreshing to see constructive criticism of a piece of media you once loved (haha, I say this because Iāve grown quite bitter toward VK myself).
One of the things that interested me most about VK, aside from the romance, was its vampire loreāwhich, in my opinion, had a lot of untapped potential. Weāve seen so many different interpretations of vampires in series like The Vampire Diaries, Twilight, True Blood, and Interview with the Vampire. Each of them adds unique elements to their lore, whether itās vampire politics, religious origins, blood bonds, or social status.
For example, I always found traditional takes of vampires a little more interesting and a bit funny. (Not being allowed into someoneās home without being formally invited)
I guess my question is: what aspects would you have added or changed in VKās vampire lore? What elements do you think worked well, and which ones fell flat? Iād love to hear your thoughts!
Firstly, thank you so much for perusing through my blog and enjoying my content! Iām really glad it was entertaining for you. ;)
Ah, yes, this series⦠gosh, it does inspire such difficult feelings when concepts are intriguing but execution falls flat⦠Alas, can only such issues lend to thoughtful analytical postulation on how to fix said problemsāand I do love theorizing what could shape the story to be more satisfying for the narrative, plot and characters! Itās what keeps me going for my own story writing of the series. ^^
Oh, boy! Synthesizing and analyzing vampire lore was once my greatest hyperfixation when I was younger! Itās just such a fun mythos to delve into since it keeps evolving as the genre of monster changes with almost each new iteration. I completely agree, too! Original vampire lore used in modern media is quite funny at times but at least has more logical sense to how the vampires tick. Theyāre the undead, the methods of transformation to vampirism is widely the sameāusually. Though I did find Hinoās vampires of being more.. human-like fun, too, and a subversion of the traditional vampire lore. Only problem, however, she doesnāt flesh out her changes correctly and creates more problems than solving her own issues.
So, yes, I definitely agree with the untapped potential and all the issues Hino had with her own lore.. so much was left to interpretation or fan theories to grasp her concepts because she didnāt take the time to shape her world building.
Take magic, for example, it had been one of the issues for me to conceptualize in the series when I was reshaping the worldbuilding for my writing. Thereās also the lack thereof religious elements or spirituality, as well⦠and since you brought up other series that do use such things like paganismāmeaning witches! Such supernatural entities help shape the worldās magical attributes which wouldāve aided to explain the original purebloods than just.. Darwinism.. pseudoscience.. mutations..
Honestly, itās the lacking details for her vampire origins on how her vampire lore works thatās such a conundrum for the series. Take purebloodsāas a conceptātheyāre god-like beings with magnificent power, however, we never understand their limitations in magical prowess and the only grounding aspect is simply: they turn humans into vampires (slaves), they live infinitely, their blood is a medicine and/or poison, and they can control lesser vampires in the caste system.
But logistics really matter when you get down to itāwhat makes them magical? Is it really just a biological mutation, so more science based? Why the magical powers?
I had to explain away that a vampireās blood is the magicāblood magic. If youāre familiar with DNDāthe mechanics usually have it that vampireās power is from their blood. In doing so, I solidified that all magical spells and seals are used with vampire blood which can be used in alchemy. Though, that was my only way to make proper sense of Hinoās version of things when it comes to hunterās using spells or sealsāor even the pureblood sealing ritual to make a pureblood human.
However, I started to ponder the method of turning humans into vampiresāwhat makes pureblood fangs have some kind of magical property to turn humans into vampires, then? I donāt like this dissonance in logic why purebloods are the only vampires to turn humans via their āspecial fangs.ā It creates another problem of: āwhy is that the only way to turn vampires and that leads to level-Esā? It makes these mutated species more snake-like if their fangs are so special that itās a poison/venom or disease theyāre spreading? Itās less vampire like, of course, than typical vampire lore because the method of transformation is to be on the brink of death via being drained of oneās blood and being given the blood of your sire to complete the ritualāessentially, you die and come back a monster, the undead. Hinoās vampires are quite human-basedātheyāre alive, they can procreate, they can walk in the sun (albeit, itās uncomfortable, but theyāre alive and well), holy water isnāt an issue or stakesāno religious iconography in use to say theyāre demons or children of the damned. Hino paints her vampires as monsters and beasts but theyāre the least beastial than any vampire lore out there. Thereās even a solution to their feeding problemāblood tablets (I take issue with this despite liking the conceptāit solves the problem but then it shows how much of a paradise it is for vampires? Thereās no side-effects to blood tablets, itās just that theyāre not appetizing. Otherwise, itās a solid living choice to blend into society without having to deal with true bloodlust problems. No conflict = no fun for the story! Theyāre monstersāact like it! But thatās only reserved for level-Es and the manipulative machinations of purebloods.)
The fact that vampiresāon the wholeācan procreate means they donāt need purebloods! Theyāre just ruled by this royalty system and stick to such waysāout of pride? Obligation? We donāt know. There shouldāve been so much more conflict in the caste system!
Hinoās vampires also donāt suffer much despite the disparaging leveling within the caste system. Taking that tablet solution from earlierāhow much more intriguing would it have been to explore level D and Cs that arenāt as rich as the Bs and As, and so they canāt afford this blood tablet solution. There could be some level D vampires that were forcibly turned that just want to live comfortably and not feed off humans like a beast. So petty crimes in blood banks (actually have them? Like, come on, itās in modern vampire stories everywhere! VK has hospitals!) or robbery/recreation of blood tablets that have bad side-effects can hit the black market for those lesser in the caste system to obtain. Have ādrugā lords over these less-than-savory tablets to hand out to the lower caste system. Have the Cs and Ds HATE the Bs and As! Have the Bs try to kill the As! Why would aristocrats WANT to be subjected under pureblood rule? They can get by on their own merit! Such political conflicts make for a fun story! Adds mystery, intrigue, crime, political machinations, etc.
Anyways, Iāve touched on most bases on how Hinoās vampires work, so as for your true question: what aspects would I change or keep. Itās funny, cause I wrote a lot here of what Iām doing for my fanfic to make sense of Hinoās world: essentially, what Iād actually change would be quite a lot but not as much because itās the technicalities Iād like to alter.
As I mentioned, I like this subversion to vampire lore by making them human-like: procreation, not burning by sunlight, can eat/drink human food, donāt need to be invited to enter homes, no weakness to holy water/stakes. All such fun takes! But, Iād like to add witches or gods to the vampire origin lore. Iād also keep it to two types of vampires, kind of like TVD/Originals: a family of progenitor vampires and the rest are vampires (no other class differentials). However, all vampires can turn humans into vampiresāitās not selective to the progenitor family. The progenitor family can be the same in lore wise to the Mikaelsonsāthey can control every vampire but no vampire can control them. Having two separating sects in the vampires completely simplifies everything without going into that disparity of the caste system or lore discrepancies with the purebloods.
IF we keep purebloods as an entity with multiple families and theyāre the only ones to change vampiresāIād probably change the method of how they create vampires: their fangs arenāt what makes a vampire, itās their blood. Only the blood exchange with a pureblood blood in your system can you become a vampire, thus this cancels out the:
They can never bite any human because their fangs make vampires
So, Iām eliminating the level E issue entirely and the hunterās main objective is more police force to keep the vampires in line and human safe, less having to deal with the mess of purebloods making level-E beasts. This also simplifies the lore greatly without facing the whole: what makes their fangs different? Otherwise, youāre having to explain: is it a poison/venom on their fangs, and if it is, does it mean their saliva is tainted with it? If so, doesnāt that mean even a kiss or any saliva contact could make you a vampire? It gets more into.. snake attributes as I stated earlier⦠I donāt like it, lol.
Now, this means purebloods have fantastical powers via blood magic and they can make vampires but itās not tied to their fangs but that very blood magicāalmost disease-like of a spread. I did think they can still cause a former human pain if we link psychological effects onto the victimāsay, if the subject being transformed has a will to reject becoming a vampire and that mental fight causes them to go insaneāthis refusal manifesting in the body can cause issues and be the level-E substitute.
I do think keeping the pureblood pheromones as a proponent to subjugate the vampires below them is a nice touch. Though, adding in hypnosis via compulsion would be a nice psychological twist that doesnāt just need to be sire-fledgling bond. I also donāt think we should make it towhere the purebloods are prey to other vampiresāitās silly. Keep to the narrative that theyāre the dominant ones that control, not victims we need to feel sorry for except their own hubris and mental erosion that leads to lack of humanity/compassion. Theyāre pitiful beings but ultimately, theyāre monsters.
I think the last issue is blood drinking, aka: āOnly the blood of the one you love can quench your thirst.ā In theory, itās romantic and poetic but reallyāthe logistics of it, once again, falls flat. It feels like a mind-over-matter type deal while also being a oxytocin/serotonin/dopamine junky kinda thing. Thatās how Iād explain the need to drink from the one you love, at least. I donāt mind it but shaping it as a taste preference: Iāve seen vampire lore have vampires addicted to the taste of humans with adrenaline or cortisol (fear) running through their veinsāI see no difference for the other hormones, really.
Okay! I think thatās all my thoughts! Thereās definitely some points I didnāt get to but I think I got to the ones I held big issues with so I hope you enjoyed my long-winded meta building of vampire/Hinoās lore nonetheless, anon. I certainly had so much fun with this discussion cause itās constantly on my mind on how to reshape the series and what I can play with. Thank you so much for your ask, your input, and your presence cause itās so nice for me to see such people that want to discuss things outside of the LT/shipping/fandom nonsense. LOL
Thank you so, so much again, anon! Please drop by any time! Hope to see your asks in the future and if you ever want to, feel free to drop me a message, too. Iām always up for a discussion on vampire lore, this god forsaken series, or anything in between! ^^ Have a good one!