Breaking the Sacred Institution of Marriage: A Dangerous Narrative by the Media
The recentĀ Times of IndiaĀ article titledĀ āTogether but apart! Why some Indian couples are choosing LAT marriagesāĀ is yet another glaring example of how certain sections of the media are deliberately trying to erode the very foundation of Indian family values and Indiaās civilizational ethos.
Surprisingly, this is not just Times of India. Within weeks,Ā India TodayĀ ran āCan āLiving Apart Togetherā marriages be a hit in India?ā,Ā Indian ExpressĀ published āLove in separate spaces: Why Indian couples are embracing the āliving apart togetherā trendā,Ā The TelegraphĀ ran āLATent problems: Can love survive without living together?ā, andĀ Brides TodayĀ followed with āWhy more married couples in India are choosing to live apart, togetherā¦ā
Four leading publications, back-to-back, pushing the same narrative. Coincidence? Or a well-funded toolkit in action?
This another narrative is dangerous because Marriage in India is not just a contract between two individuals, it is aĀ Samskar, a sacred commitment that binds two souls and two families. It is the cornerstone of our social and cultural fabric, ensuring stability, emotional security, and intergenerational continuity of values.
Promoting āLATā (Living Apart Together) under the guise of modernity, feminism, and empowerment is nothing but an attempt toĀ fracture the harmony of Indian families. LAT may be a coping mechanism in the West, whereĀ divorce rates are soaring,Ā children grow up in broken homes, andĀ loneliness has become a pandemic, but why should Bharat, which thrives on strong family bonds, import such a failed template?
This is the Western template which is imported and imposed upon Indians. In Western societies whereĀ divorce rates have skyrocketed, whereĀ children grow up in broken homes, andĀ loneliness, LAT marriages emerged as an alternative to dysfunctional relationships. Why Should India ā a civilization that has thrived for thousands of years on the strength of its familial bonds and family support systems,Ā have always been the backbone of our resilience ā import such failing models?Ā Such narratives are alien to our ethos. The attempt to normalize these concepts by presenting rare cases (not even 0.001% of society) as a trend is misleading and malicious.Ā Why adopt what the West is trying to fix?
Is it Feminism or Fragmentation?Ā Under the garb of feminism and women empowerment, media houses are slyly pushing an agenda of isolation, detachment, and individualism. True empowerment lies inĀ partnership, equality, and shared responsibility, not in promoting physical separation as a solution to marital challenges.
The narrative thatĀ distance strengthens loveĀ is not just flawed, it is a calculated attempt toĀ weaken the institution of marriage, which is central to Sanatan Dharma and Indian society.
This is not an isolated attempt. FromĀ glorifying same-sex marriage, toĀ mocking traditional roles, to pushing aĀ boy to feel like a girl, to nowĀ romanticizing LAT, this is larger designed agenda toĀ erode the Indian family system, the single strongest pillar of social stability in our civilization.
Media packages this as āchoiceā and āprogressā, butĀ progress does not mean cultural suicide.
The essence of marriage is companionship⦠sharing joys and sorrows, building a life together, raising children in an environment of trust and love. Yes, challenges exist in every relationship, but solutions lie in dialogue, understanding, and mutual adjustment, not in creating artificial distance.
We must call out such narrative warfare and misleading journalism; and reaffirm our faith in Indian values that celebrate family as the nucleus of society. Modernity need not mean abandoning tradition. True progress is when we blend contemporary aspirations with timeless values ā not when we copy flawed Western experiments blindly.
Marriage is not a cage. It is companionship. And companionship thrives on togetherness⦠not distance.