When I teach my students about organizational culture, one of the things we talk about are artifacts: visual representations of norms and meaning. These could be art, posters, websites or office layouts. What is the organization telling you about what it is, what values it cares about? Sometimes, the answer reflects decades or even centuries of organic and incremental choices and compromises. And sometimes it reflects a stark decision to impose a certain narrative, to make certain histories, ideas or even people disappear.
Right now, the federal government is engaged in a dramatic purging of visual representations of American history and its current workforce. Some of this is a Stalinist removal of former officials. The official portraits of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, and Trump Secretary of Defense Mark Esper are gone. An NIH mural featuring Anthony FauciĀ was removed.
More systematically, it is also the removal of women, persons of color, and trans people, following executive orders around DEI and gender. Here, the removals signal the end one form of representation that valued inclusiveness and a broader understanding and acknowledgment of people whose stories were not always told.
Trump is a TV guy obsessed with visuals ā how many times has he described someone as āstraight out of central castingā? ā with a very clear vision of who is in the picture when it comes to American history.
In the Pentagon, aboutĀ 26,000 imagesĀ have already been flagged for removal and could lead to up to 100,000 images being cut on military websites. Videos of the World War II Tuskegee airmen were removed from the Air Force. After public pushback, the Trump administration restored the content and complained about āmalicious complianceā ābut how exactly are bureaucrats supposed to know which images of non-white soldiers are acceptable, and which are DEI?
[...]
The removals of images mirror the removal of people, of course. In the military, the first Black Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, C.Q. Brown, and the first woman to lead the Navy, Lisa Franchetti, were removed without explanation. Now, with Franchetti gone, there is not a single female four-star general in the armed forces. Brown was replaced by a retired three star general with significantly less qualifications. Trans members of the military are likewise being removed, and intelligence officers have alreadyĀ been fired.
I donāt want to downplay the importance of the removal of those people, but do think understanding how organizations normalize assumptions about who belongs, whose membership is to be celebrated, and who is to be removed matters. Trump is creating a visual backdrop to his project of erasure.
[...]
The rush to comply with government orders creates clumsiness and inconsistency. In some cases, gay people or women are being removed. In other spaces, they are maintained, but trans people are removed. Sometimes, the clumsiness is comical, or nonsensical. A Pentagon list of flagged images identified mentions of the Enola Gay, the bomber that dropped the atomic bomb. Because,Ā gay.Ā At the same time, a National Park website removed the representation of trans peopleās role at the Stonewall uprising, praising it instead as a key moment for the āLGBā community. Here, gay is ok. But trans is out.Ā LGB.Ā The government redefines a movement in a way that is unrecognizable to those in it.
The representation of women or LGBTQ people or Hispanics or Asian Americans or Black people mattered because their stories had historically not been featured. Erasing them is not a return to some bygone era of color-blind merit, but of blindness to the contribution of anyone who did not fit Trumpās whitewashed vision of America.
The Trump presidency is, as much as anything, a project of purging and erasing large parts of America, of people, ideas, capacities, and knowledge. Trump has also pledged to remove theĀ Institute of Museum and Library Services, which is an independent federal agency that supports libraries, archives and museums in America.
Another excellent column by Don Moynihan on the disgraceful whitewashing of American history as a result of Trumpās war on DEI.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
In his new book, former Defense Secretary Mark Esper says then-President Donald Trump proposed launching missiles into Mexico to destroy the drug labs in 2020. CNN political analyst Maggie Haberman has more.
"That's our strategy. He's gonna declare himself a winner."
On the evening ofĀ October 31, 2020, Steve Bannon told a group of associates that President Donald Trump had a plan to declare victory on election nightāeven if he was losing. Trump knew that the slow counting of Democratic-leaning mail-in ballots meant the returns would show early leads for him in key states. His āstrategyā was to use this fact to assert that he had won, while claiming that the inevitable shifts in voteĀ totals toward Joe Biden must be the result of fraud, Bannon explained.
āWhat Trumpās gonna do, is just declare victory. Right? Heās gonna declare victory. But that doesnāt mean heās a winner,ā Bannon, laughing, told the group, according to audio of the meeting obtained by Mother Jones. āHeās just gonna say heās a winner.ā
āAs it sits here today,ā Bannon said later in the conversation, describing a scenario in which Trump held an early lead in key swing states, āat 10 or 11 oāclock Trumpās gonna walk in the Oval, tweet out, āIām the winner. Game over. Suck on that.'ā
Trumpās plan to falsely declare victory while tens of millions of votes were still being counted was public knowledge even before the election. Axios reported on the scheme at the time. Bannon himself discussed the idea on November 3āElection Dayāon his War Room podcast. Weeks earlier, Bannon had interviewed a former Trump administration official who outlined how Trump would would use allegations of fraud to dispute an electoral defeat and would seek to have Congress declare him the winner. Last month, the congressional Committee investigating January 6 detailed how Rudy Giuliani convinced Trump to go ahead with a victory declaration after 2 a.m. on November 4, over the objections of campaign staff. āFrankly, we did win this election,ā Trump insisted in that infamous news conference.
The nearly hour-long audio obtained by Mother Jones is new evidence that Trumpās late-night diatribeāwhich came a few hours later than Bannon had anticipatedāfollowed a preexisting plan to lie to Americans about the election results in a bid to hold onto power. The new recording stands out for the striking candor and detail with which Bannon described a scheme to use lies to subvert democracy. Bannon also predicted that Trumpās false declaration of victory would lead to widespread political violence, along with ācrazyā efforts by Trump to stay in office. Bannon and his associates laughed about those scenarios at various points in the recording.
Bannon and his attorney, Robert Costello, did not respond to questions about the recording.
After election day, Bannon became a prominent booster of Trumpās bogus election fraud claims. The Washington Post reported Monday that Bannonās āvociferous supportā for those lies helped convince Trump to grant him a last-minute pardon on unrelated fraud charges. Speaking to Mother Jones, Costello questioned that reporting. He said that as far as he knew, āTrump never made any such statementā linking the pardon to Bannonās election rhetoric.
Bannon refused last year to cooperate with a January 6 Committee subpoena. The Justice Department later charged him with two counts of contempt of Congress. This weekend, he claimed that he now wishes to testify before the Committee. But federal prosecutors argued this about face was āirrelevantā to the charges that Bannon had already broken the law. A judge ruled Monday that the trial would go forward next week.
The pre-election audio comes from a meeting between Bannon and a half dozen supporters of Guo Wengui, an exiled Chinese mogul for whom Bannon has worked. Bannon helped Guo launch a series of pro-Trump Chinese-language news websites that have promoted an array of far-right misinformation, including a video streaming site called GTV. The meeting was intended to help GTV plan its election night coverage.
Though he did not attend, Guo arranged the confab, which was held in the Washington, DC, townhouse where Bannon tapes War Room, according to a person who was present. That source recorded the meeting and recently provided the audio to Mother Jones. The attendees included Dr. Li Meng Yan, a virologist who had made unsubstantiated claims that COVID was designed by China as a bioweaponāclaims Bannon had helped to propagate. Also there was Wang Dinggang, a GTV host who had helped to spread false claims about Hunter Biden.
Speaking to this group of mostly Chinese immigrants, Bannon explained US electoral processesāand Trumpās plans to exploit themāin some detail. He emphasized that in 2020, Republicans were more likely to vote in person, casting ballots that, in many states, would be counted first. Democrats disproportionately voted by mail. Their ballots would take days to tally in a number of states. That meant that when it came to public perceptions about who was winning, Democrats would āhave a natural disadvantage,ā Bannon said. āAnd Trumpās going to take advantage of it. Thatās our strategy. Heās gonna declare himself a winner.ā
āSo when you wake up Wednesday morning, itās going to be a firestorm,ā Bannon continued. āYouāre going to have antifa, crazy. The media, crazy. The courts are crazy. And Trumpās gonna be sitting there mocking, tweeting shit out: āYou lose. Iām the winner. Iām the king.'ā
Itās not clear how much influence Bannon, who had previously been Trumpās top White House strategist before being ousted, really wielded over Trump at this time. But Bannon has suggested that he was a key architect of Trumpās efforts to overturn the election results and has reportedly asserted that he convinced Trump to make January 6 a moment of reckoning in that bid. Bannon was also among the Trump associates who gathered in a set of rooms and suites in the Willard Hotel on January 6 to advise on the Presidentās attempt to remain in power.
Bannonās remarks to Guoās supporters indicate that he was working with a group, led by Giuliani, that wanted Trump to take particularly aggressive steps to contest unfavorable election results. Other advisers have said they opposed these steps. Bannon said during the October 31 meeting that he was collaborating closely with Giuliani, who was preparing to oversee Trumpās planned legal efforts.
Bannonās meeting with Guoās associates occurred a few weeks after Bannon, working with Giuliani, had provided the contents of Hunter Bidenās laptop to the New York Post. Bannon acknowledged in the recording that he had also helped supply Guo supporters with this material. As Mother Jones has reported, Guo then directed his backers to put sex videos and other salacious content from the laptop online. Bannon praised Guoās effort during the meeting, saying it had helped slow Bidenās momentum. That left Biden with little prospect of a resounding election night victory that Trump wouldnāt easily be able to contest, Bannon added.
As a result, any chance for a āpeaceful resolution of this is probably gone,ā Bannon said. āBecause the other three alternatives [are], either Bidenās up slightly and Trump says he stole it, right, and heās not leaving. Or itās undefined and we canāt figure out whoās leading, and Trumpās saying heās stealing it, and heās not leaving. Or, Trumpās leading, which is the one where theyāre gonna burn the city down.ā
Bannon expressed the belief that Trump actually winning would lead to violence by the left. But he also said that Trump falsely claiming heād wonāa strategy Bannon was cheering onāwould probably cause violence too. And Bannon emphasized that election night would mark the start of a battle for power in which Trump would try to stop the votes of people who opposed him from being counted, while Democrats would try to use invalid ballots to defeat him. Democrats, Bannon claimed, āsteal elections all the time.ā
Election Day 2020 would not be like others, Bannon said. āThis is a revolution,ā he explained. āThis election just triggers more fighting.ā
Bannon also said during this meeting that once the voting was done, Trump would be unencumbered by electoral pressure. āHereās the thing. After then, Trump never has to go to a voter again,ā Bannon said. āHeās gonna fire [Christopher] Wray, the FBI directorā¦Heās gonna say āFuck you. How about that?ā Becauseā¦heās done his last election. Oh, heās going to be off the chaināheās gonna be crazy.ā
Bannon also said he expected that Trump would quickly fire CIA Director Gina Haspel, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, Heath and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
āIf Trump is losing by 10 or 11 oāclock at night, itās going to be even crazier. No, because heās gonna sit right there and say, āThey stole it. Iām directing the Attorney General to shut down all ballot places in all 50 states,'ā Bannon said. āHeās not going out easy. If Biden is winning, Trump is going to do some crazy shit.ā
The very premise of [Johnny] McEnteeās memo was both sinister and ludicrous ā a 30-year-old of no professional or intellectual distinction, whose path to power was carrying Trumpās bags, was making the case for getting rid of a senior Cabinet officer for insufficient loyalty to the president. This revealing and chilling document deserves to be read not as a historical curiosity but as a terrible portent of what could be in store if Trump wins another term. He appears determined to turn the military into his personal goon squad.