While rereading Eyeshield 21, something I noticed was how Agon seemed to be especially spiteful towards Hiruma and Kurita. He's a naturally spiteful person, sure, but with those two, it seemed really personal. And I've been wondering... Why is that?
And i think i have my answer
More than once through the series (and especially during the Shinryuu Nagas game), comparisons are drawn between Hiruma and Unsui
Even on the character intro pages in volume 23, and the credits page in volume 20, they're drawn in ways that directly parallel each other.
And i think this is meant to imply that, on some level, Hiruma reminded Agon of Unsui.
Except, at this point, Unsui had already given up. He stopped trying to reach for higher, accepting the fact that he's just not that talented, and began existing only to try and make Agon look better
And what i find interesting is, despite how arrogant and selfish he is, Agon doesn't seem to like Unsui's decision here.
If anything, he looks disappointed. Pensive. Maybe even a little frustrated.
When Unsui got the news about the scholarship and broke down, Agon went to see him. Not to gloat - and in fact, he doesn't even say anything until Unsui is finished.
Agon may have gone there to try and comfort his brother, but he's such a self centered person, that he didn't know how.
Agon and Hiruma started working together sometime around this. And when they were working together to build Hiruma's threat book, i wonder if... Well
Maybe Agon was using his relationship with Hiruma to fill the void that Unsui created?
Unsui gave up. He lost his ambition, and it seems like he stopped hanging out with his brother too. We see a lot of flashbacks of them together as kids, but we see very little of them interacting outside of a school setting once they're in highschool. Their relationship has effectively ended.
But Hiruma still had that drive. And, even if they were just using each other, it was still a relationship. It was still some kind of interaction where Agon was working together with someone again. Someone of average skill who was intelligent, driven, and on the same wavelength as him
And, given how the narrative pushes the idea that Usui and Hiruma are similar... I think Agon was subconsciously using Hiruma as a replacement.
But then Hiruma broke that illusion.
He refused to bow down and agree with everything Agon believed.
And then, even worse - the reason Hiruma was doing all this in the first place was for Kurita.
In the end, i think it all boils down to jealousy.
Agon didn't have Unsui anymore. Even if his brother wasn't as strong or as talented as him, he was still always there, and at least tried to compete despite always losing. But that was gone now.
So then he and Hiruma start working together. And it's a good enough replacement for a while- until it isn't, and Hiruma unintentionally reminds Agon that he isn't Unsui.
In the end, Kurita is more important to Hiruma. He's the reason the threat book exists, and the reason they're trying to get into Shinryuu in the first place.
Kurita - someone Agon considers significantly less than him. An untalented loser. Trash.
So Agon lashes out, and takes the scholarship.
(which, i will admit, the timeline here is a little bit confusing, bc Agon effectively stole the scholarship twice and at different points in times, bc in one flashback he had natural hair, and in the other he had dreadlocks
There were 2 scholarship slots open, and Ikkyu already had one. That's why Kurita was gunning for the other.
My understanding is that Usui sent in the scholarship request, and since they mistook him for Agon, the scholarship became null, and the spot was still open for Kurita to grab
So, bc Agon already knew he'd get in bc of the mixup with Unsui, he went in to formally request the scholarship and stole it from Kurita)
In addition to everything else - i think Agon was also envious bc Hiruma had the kind of relationship he'd been missing.
Hiruma , Kurita, and Musashi were a happy little trio, trying to live out their dreams together. And maybe, looking at them reminded Agon of what he didn't have - and honestly, never had - with Unsui. Something he subconsciously craved, that sort of connection.
Now, you know who else has been directly compared to Hiruma by a character in the series?
Habashira Rui.
By Rui himself.
And he's right. Hiruma and Rui are very similar in a lot of ways. The only real difference between them were circumstances beyond their control.
Rui largely stays out of the series up until the World Cup, to the point that he and Agon never even interact until then. But what's really interesting is that Rui reminds Agon of someone else.
He reminds Agon of Unsui.
And this particular comparison doesn't bother Agon in the way it did with Hiruma. And i think that's bc Agon has no history with Rui - none of that baggage that Hiruma's existence carries. He's effectively a blank slate.
It makes sense that Agon would make this connection too, since Unsui, Hiruma, and Rui have all been set up by the narrative to be parallels with each other.
We see Agon already thinking about Unsui during the World Cup, before Rui reveals himself.
He's actually considering his brother's situation and feelings. It's one of the few times he shows that kind of care for anyone else.
And he seems almost regretful about it all. Bc he knows he's the reason Unsui's self confidence got beaten down so badly. It doesn't matter if Agon intended to do it or not - the fact is Agon was born more naturally gifted, and that wore away at Unsui until there was no ambition left in him
But seeing Rui struggling reminds Agon of his brother. Of the times before, when Unsui did have that ambition to keep going.
And so, knowing Unsui is watching, Agon challenges him by playing the rest of the game without his wig - looking like Unsui.
Effectively telling Unsui "You could be here too. Why aren't you?"
And, i think it's important to note that Agon does this after getting MVP points for saving Rui. In other words, saving Rui made Agon look good.
Which, I'll remind you, was literally his goal from the start when joining Team Japan
But Agon doesn't look like he appreciated that at all. Bc he's already made the connection between Rui and Unsui.
Bc he actually wants his brother to be there with him. He isn't satisfied by Unsui giving up. He wants his brother to have that drive and ambition again.
He doesn't want Unsui to exist just to make Agon look good.
And it works. This finally ignites a fire under Unsui. He wants to play again, not just to make Agon look good - but for himself.
Agon helped Unsui regain his ambition, because of Habashira Rui.
And i wanna point out - despite Rui being exactly the kinda person Agon would have called a loser, trash, worthless, etc earlier in the series - Agon never once says those things about him.
Anyway uhhhh this post started with me trying to figure something out, and then it became a long analysis about Agon and his relationships. oops
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
So Iāve written a couple of times about the wizard of Oz connections that 911 has had in the past. Well after 8x03 and the trailer for 8x04 - everything has become much clearer to me and boy oh boy is Tim pulling a blinder with this one!
I need to start by saying he is playing on lore from both the original books as well as the film, so much of this wouldnāt be evident if you had little to no knowledge of the book series. I however do - because I loved the books as a child and I have also long been interested in the link between the books, the original film and the queer narrative that runs through them. Especially because of my yellow and blue and then blue and green colour theory and its use in telling queer narratives in cinema and television in the aftermath of the 1939 film.
For those who donāt know the background of it, you can read my post here about the wizard of oz and its queer narrative and the yellow/blue colour theme, but for a brief run down the wizard of oz and its themes have been a key part of the queer narrative since they first appeared in print and then on film. Yellow blue colour theory stems from Dorothys dress and the yellow brick road and became a film short hand for queer narratives in film, during the hays code era (1934-1968), and has continued on to this day. the most recent and most obvious use of the blue/yellow blue/green coding has been in heartsotopper - where it is very heavily and very cleverly used to help tell the queer narrative, but it is its use in films during the hays code where it was doing a lot of work to āsecretlyā provide queer narrative in film. (this is a specialist subject of mine and I could write about it all day - I really would love to do a phd in it, but I do not have the money or time to do that so I write about it at any opportunity on tumblr!)
Many of the nods to the story are subtle, but they are there and I am going to go through a good number of them with you - especially the ones weāve had in season 8 so far, the main thing to note right off the bat though is that they all connect in to Eddie and that is very telling to me - especially when we take 5x01 - 5x04 into account. the rest is below the cut becasue it's long!
The very first reference to the Wizard of Oz we get is in 202 - 7.1. We have the entitled woman (that is the name they gave the character in the credits!) with her dog - Paisley.The entitled woman is wearing red shoes and we get shown her with just her feet sticking out from under the rubble in a clear nod to the wicked witch of the east being buried under Dorothys house in Oz.
Kat the little girl who gets separated from her family and ultimately reunited with them is a nod to the overall story of Dorothy in the wizard of Oz - and Paisley is a nod to Toto - Dorothyās dog. I will also mention the fact that we get a heart metaphor during this disaster - Jeff - the heart of a champion.Ā
We get a further nod in season 2 in 207 - Haunted - where we have the girl at the halloween parade dressed as the film version of Dorothy. I donāt think there is a huge amount to read into from a Wizard of Oz perspective, beyond the fact that it is referenced - we donāt actually need to see anything further in regards to the Wizard of Oz - its all about making the connection.
This episode is a big episode of Eddie and his storyline and this is a way for 911 to link Eddie into the Wizard of Oz theme without being massively obvious about it and his absence from this scene is a key part of that.
There are other key elements in this scene that weāve been seeing come into play over the seasons for Eddie and that is what makes the wizard of Oz reference especially interesting. First up it's important to note that this is the episode we see the return of Shannon in. We have the horse and his rider - being separated by the death of the horse and the officer describing the horse as his friend. There are two things this is playing on here - the first is the foreshadowing of Shannons death, the second is that the show has then reused this metaphor of partners being separated by death, this time making use of the police aspect as a part of Eddies breakdown in season 5 - Millsās - Eddies partner while he was in the army and her death. These two elements are why Eddie absence is key - Eddie becomes the officer and Shannon or Mills becomes the Horse and having Eddie present in the scene waters down the metaphor.
The fact we get a lot of wizard of Oz references in season 5, makes this a really interesting and clever connection to draw. The other aspects of this scene in 207 is the pretty important reference about the horse needing a sedative to stop him thrashing around until his heart gave out. Bearing in mind this is the first really intentional heart metaphor we see on the show and itās a pretty key episode for Eddie in relation to his heart, his absence from this scene becomes louder, especially as he is off with his heart (Christopher) enjoying halloween. It makes it clear that the Eddie and hearts metaphor has been there since very early on - and has been (at least loosely)connected to The Wizard of Oz.
Remembering what I said above and in my other post about the wizard of Oz being very heavily connected to queer theming and storytelling in media it makes it likely that this is the show putting in early building blocks for a queer Eddie arc gif they wanted to then go down that route later on. (this makes the season 5 theming Iāll talk about shortly even more interesting to me!)
The last thing to mention is the is the emphasis on the devil, a priest and a drag queen at the parade- all things we see appearing in Eddies arc through season n7 and into 8. The drag queens from the bachelor party - in which we really see Eddie letting go and have fun for the first time. The priest and the devil are a metaphor for Eddies struggles with his faith - the idea of temptation (in the catholic church - especially the devout catholic church, being queer in any way is seen as being tempted by the devil), and with us having knowledge of Eddie going to church and likely talking to a priest in some capacity in the next few episodes, we have yet another tie back to this storyline from 207.
Now I obviously have no proof with what the intentions were for ~Eddie in season 5, but Iāve long had my theories and now, knowing that they had originally intended to have Bucks bisexual arc take place in s5 but it got shut down by the higher ups, I can make some pretty educated guesses based off what we did get early on in the season.
Season 5 opened with the blackout and then we led straight in to 5x04 āHome and Awayā with all its yellow and blue colour theming. Can you see where Iām going with this? How does the opening of the film version of the Wizard of Oz start? Yup thatās right - in black and white and then when Dorothy finds herself over the rainbow everything is in colour and the use of yellow and blue is very strong with Dorothyās blue gingham dress and the yellow brick road with the green colouring coming later on when they reach the emerald city.
So I think 911 was intending to play on that concept in season 5 - the idea that the black out is a nod to Kansas being in black and white (not to mention the use of green for the hackers!) and then 5x04 is a play on Dorothy following the yellow brick road - hence the heavy use of yellow and blue and the way it winds through the narrative of the episode (along with the use of the bluejay as the schools animal emblem - which is a symbol of communication, curiosity and confidence - seeing a bluejay is telling you to be bold and chase your goals!). What is the other thing we get a huge number of references to in season 5 - especially connected to Eddie - hearts and heart metaphors.
We do also get a nod to the wizard of Oz in season 6 and the zeppelin disaster - which is a nod to the hot air balloon the wizard crashed into Oz in. The zeppelin is yellow and blue and the conversation on board refers to one of the pilots mother in law - whilst she isnāt stated to be a witch, the implication is there. the 110 is also closed in roughly the same place as we get it closed in 8x03. along with the fact that Eddie is the one to go into the zeppelin - Chim and Buck only partially go in - and the parallel storyline in the episode is about a heart issue, we once again have The Wizard of Oz being tied into heart metaphors.
Letās move on to season 8 now and look at the vast number of Wizard of Oz references we have seen so far and appear to have coming up in 8x04. I will say the sheer number of references in season 8 compared with the more subtle ones from seasons 5 and 6 is one of the reasons Iām so very sure we have a queer Eddie arc going on - that theyāve finally been able to pull that trigger and move things forward for him.
Just remember that things donāt have to exactly follow the story of the wizard of Oz to be relevant - its not about the narrative following the same path, but more about the use of recognised aspects and tropes from the book and film to convey information and aid the storytelling. It is often more about the concept and meaning behind something and a 911 character may share the traits of more than one wizard of oz character because it is their traits that are relevant not necessarily TWoO characters full journey through the book or film.
The bee-nado is a literal reference to the tornado that sent Dorothy to oz - its one of the reasons we donāt see more of the bees - they serve their purpose in the same way the tornado does so we donāt need to see them again.
Gerrard building āhis 118ā with a security fence around the firehouse and cast iron plumbing is a reference to the wizard building the Emerald city - which has a wall around it for security. In Oz it is the place full o the most up to date technology etc. So Gerrard is building his Emerald City.
The mother in the car falling asleep due to anaphylaxis is likely a reference to the poppy field in the film version of TWoO, along with the flowers at the perfume launch and Bucks statement that āsmoke worked last timeā - because the smoke did make the bees sleepy like the poppies made Dorothy and her friends sleepy.
Bucks plan to have Eddie run and attract the the swarm of bees is a reference to an event that happens in the book. The wicked witch sends a swarm of bees to sting them to death. The tin man and scarecrow had seen them coming and scarecrow comes up with a plan - he has Dorothy, toto and the lion covered in his straw to hide them from the bees who only find the tin man - they try to sting him but it breaks their stings and kills them instead without hurting the tin man as he is impervious to bees by nature of being made of tin. What we see happen in 801 is very clearly placing Buck into the role of Scarecrow and Eddie into the role of tin man - Buck comes up with the plan and Eddie undertakes it successfully - his turnouts protecting him from the bees just like the tin man being made of tin protected him.
Gerrard hitting his head is a reference to Dorothy hitting her head in the tornado and waking up in Oz - its a reference to Dororthyās lineĀ āToto, I have a feeling weāre not in Kansas anymoreā - its a play on the fact that the 118 is a very different place to when Gerrard was removed first time. Gerrard represents the black and white world - outdated and not up with the times (which he wasnāt back in the day either but thatās kind of the point), the world (the 118) is now in glorious technicolour since his departure and Gerrard will end up back in a black and white world in the end while the rest of the 118 will remain in colour and move forward. This places Gerrard in the role of the Wizard, but it is more akin to the book wizard than the film wizard - originally in the books (it was later glossed over as it didnāt go down well with readers) the Wizard arrives in a hot air balloon and becomes ruler of Oz by usurping he King and handing over the princess to a witch (more on this later!). As is shown in the film, he leaves Oz to return home in a hot air balloon.Ā If Gerrard is the wizard, this makes Bobby the king (usurped from his throne at the 118) and Hen becomes Ozma (this is something I will talk about a bit later as it deserves its own section!) which fits with how we are being shown Hen being given the 118 captains role on a more frequent basis - suggesting the show is transitioning her into becoming the captain down the line.
Tia, her dog and Jordan are an interesting trio - they are a very clear parallel serve as a multi layered allegory as they play on several aspects of the film and books, as well as linking to aspects of 911 and especially on Buck and Eddies storyline.Ā
Firstly we have the dog - who is the same type of dog as Paisley from season 2 - right down to the red bow in the hair (which is encouraging us to draw parallels with the earthquake disaster). Both dogs are a nod to Toto - Dorothyās dog in the Wizard of Oz. The dog is also a representation of Buck, but Iāll go into that when I talk about Buck below!
Tia represents both Dorothy and the tin man, we see her initially as, not heartless, but guarded, but she softens especially when we see her following the instructions Hen gives, and bonding with various people on the plane including Jordan, in much the same way we see the tin man do for Dorothy and scarecrow. She is also a representation of Eddie (again Iāll go into this more later on)Ā
Jordan is a reference to both the flying monkeys (through his telephone conversation he is implied to be a business monkey which is in turn a play on monkey business - behaviour that causes discomfort our annoyance) and the cowardly lion. He is also a reference to Chopfyt who only appears in the books and is a man made from the parts of others and is a reference to Tommy, which I will explain later as well!
its worth pointing out that Jordans viagra fuelled boner is hidden under a rainbow towel and when they get off the plane Tia, Jordan and the dog are sat on a yellow tarpaulin - the implication being that they are still in Oz and over the rainbow, but that isn't real life - its fake - a dream - and reaity will set back in once they are able to go home.
Buck has 2 red flares to bring the plane home - symbolic of the red slippers - click three times and say thereās no place like home.
There is a lot of yellow and blue lighting used in combination - especially around Buck and Eddie.
The green lighting on the plane after it has landed - a reference to leaving the Emerald city and Oz and going home.
Im sure there are others that I may have missed, but these are the key ones, and most of them will likely remain in play in some capacity in the upcoming episodes.
As for the potential upcoming oz references, we have the following
the tiger in 804 is likely a reference to lions and tigers and bears. Oh my! from the film, but may also be a reference to the hungry tiger from the books - who is a tiger who is never full and desires to eat a fat baby but never would as his conscience would never allow him to. He is described in the books as the largest and most powerful of his kind and is one of Ozmas chariot drivers and is friends with the cowardly lion. The Tiger reference coming in no place like home and the books connection of the tiger with Princess Ozma and the cowardly lion makes me feel like Karen may be represented by and paralleled with the tiger, and the idea that Karens conscience wonāt allow her to metaphorically eat Ortiz (the fat baby) but that is purely speculation on my part!
the pumpkin stuck on a head storyline thatās been hinted at coming up in 805 - in the books there is a character called Jack pumpkin head who is made by the Princess Ozma when she is Tip and then brought to life by magic (Ozma is the rightful ruler of Oz and was given to the Witch Mombi of the North by the wizard in order to prevent he rightful ruler of Oz ascending the throne. Ozma is transformed into a boy called Tip by Mombi, but is later turned back when Glinda discovers what has happened). Im expecting this arc on the show to play into Jackās storyline in the books. Jack refers to having lost a father when Tip is returned to being Ozma. I think weāll see it played as a reference to Mara, Chim and Hen, because Hen is Very Ozma coded which Iāll explain a bit more later on!
Masks. with 805 being titled masks it feels very loaded towards the Wizard of oz and the fact he wears different masks (in the book) depending on who he is meeting with. He appears to Dorothy as a giant head (as we see used in the film), to the Scarecrow as a lovely lady, to the Tin Woodman as a terrible beast, and to the cowardly Lion as a ball of fire. He does this with the intention of scaring them all, but in all cases has chosen the wrong image to make the desired impression. there is of course the fact that the mask slips (the curtain gets pulled away by Toto) and the truth of the Wizard is revealed - that he is a fraud -Ā merely a man who has been using magic tricks to make himself seem great and powerful.
these are just the ones we know about, there may very likely be more revered once weāve seen the episodes, for example we might get a play on Eddie in church and going to confession - the idea of hiding ones identity behind a screen.
I want to talk a bit about the specifics of the firefam, and how they fit into the concept in a more detailed way. Obviously all members of the firefam fit into multiple aspects of each of the 4 main characters in Oz, but they each have one that has a stronger pull than the others. Each one of the characters in the books and film have specific traits that form their personality and a key part of their narrative - Dorothy wants to get home, The lion wants courage, the scarecrow a brain and the tin man a heart. These are all allegories for the bigger picture.Ā
Dorothy wants to go home, yes, but that is part of her bigger desire to belong - the books reveal much more about her past and upbringing in Kansas.Ā She is also the first person in the wider story - it is her journey that sets in motion all of the other ones.
The cowardly lion is in fact not cowardly, but incredibly brave, and a loyal friend, he is just full of self doubt because he believes his fear makes him inadequate as lions are supposed to be the king of beasts. we see him overcome that self doubt and go onto succeed - becoming a well respected and important member of Ozma'z court.
The scarecrow wants a brain but is in fact shown to be the smartest of the group - coming up with clever plans and sharing a great depth of knowledge the also becomes the ruler of the Emerald city - appointed by the wizard when he leaves, and it is stated by the tin man in one of the later books the he is āprobably the wisest man in all Ozā
The Tin man wants a heart, but in fact is one of the most tender, emotional, considerate and caring people in Oz as well as being extremely competent and practical.Ā He is also shown to seize up and rust due to either the rain or his tears. In the books he is given more backstory - his axe was enchanted by the wicked witch of the east and it causes him to chop off his body parts limb by limb. The witch does this because he is win love with her ward Nimmie Amee. when he chops out his heart he feels his could no longer love her and so left. he does later try to find his long lost love but is left disappointed when he finds her married to a man made up of his body parts and those of another tin man called Captain Fyter who had also been enchanted by the witch for the same reason. she refuses to leave her man of parts and tin man and scarecrow return to the emerald city together.
The Tin man and the scarecrow sit very much in parallel with one another in both the books and the 1939 film, they are very much a pair and shown to be each others foil and in the books especially spend a long time debating with one another about the relative importance of the brain and heart, but in combination with one another form a perfect whole.Ā
With the main characters of Oz covered we can explore the way 911 is using their traits to tell the stories of our firefam, but before we do that I want to look at a few other key 911 characters and how they relate to the wizard of oz!
Bobby in my opinion is Glinda the good witch - he shares a lot of traits with her. It is Ginda who helps restore Oz (the 118) to its fully unified state - something that had ceased to be under the Wizard and the wicked witches rule in separate counties. She also tends not to meddle or interfere in Ozian matters unless requested to do so. This fits with bobbyās traits very well - he doesnāt tend to get involved in things unless pushed to do so or asked directly. Much earlier in Ozās history Glinda also helps redeem the tyrannical king of Oz through the creation of the forbidden fountain and the waters of oblivion - the king drank the water and then forgets his cruel and nefarious intentions. bobby replacing Gerrard at the 118 fits fairly well into this theme.
Ortiz is an interesting one - she fits into bot the role of The wizard, as well as the wicked witch of the west. I think that Ortiz is the wizard in part because the name Ortiz can loosely be read a s a play on āwizā as in wizard, but also because she is the most powerful person in the show right now - and it is all built on lies and corruption - much like the wizard is in Oz! However as the film unfolds we are shown that the witch is in fact more powerful than the wizard, but is also eventually easily brought down. This is why I think she is also a reference to the wicked witch, but also because the witch controls the flying Monkeys - who serve as her lackeys and undertake her bidding.
Gerrard is bothĀ the Wizard of Oz and a flying monkey. I wrote above about the wizard hiding behind screens and masks and and Gerrard and I wrote about Gerrard building fences around the 118 being reference to the wizard building the emerald city. The flying monkey connection is obvious - he is working under Ortiz.
Tommy fits into a couple of different characters. He is in my opinion most closely connected to Chopfyt and Nimmie Amee, but he also fits into the meaning of the flying monkeys. Chopfyt is made up of the parts of the Tin woodman and Captain Fyter (the tin soldier) who are rivals for the attention of Nimmie Amee who is married to Chopfyt but was at one time courted by the tin man and the tin soldier.Ā Captain Fyter and the Tin WoodmanĀ become friends during their journey to find Nimmie Amee. The flying monkey connection is perhaps a more obvious of the three, the monkeys are subservient to the wicked witch of the west and in the begins episodes we are shown Tommy being very much under Gerrard wing through his behaviour. It is also worth nothing that the flying Monkeys in the book drop the tin man over shape rocks leaving him so dented he could not move and they pull the scarecrow apart, scattering his straw and throwing his clothes up a tree - Dorothy is able to repair them both with the aid of the Winkies (the people under the control of the wicked witch of the west) and Dorothy then commands the flying monkeys to take them to the Emerald city.Ā
The meaning of these character connections is clear to me - Tommy as Nimmie Amee courts first the tin man (Eddie) and then the Tin Soldier (Buck) but chooses Chopfyt in the long run. Tommy is made up of parts of both Buck and Eddie in the same way that Chopfyt is made up of parts of Tin man and Captain Fyter. The fact neither Tin man or the Tin soldier succeed with Nimmie Amee and that she choses Chopfyt is telling and possibly gives us clues about the eventual demise of Buck and Tommys relationship and suggests that as tommy fits both characters parts (both characters who are fairly small roles in the books and are plot devices - much in the same way as Tommy is in 911), he will ultimately choose himself (as weāve already seen him do in 705).
Onto the 4 remaining members of the firefam, and I believe Chimney is for the moist part, meant to be Dorothy - he is the first member of the firefam in the same way Dorothy is, he fits a lot more of the Dorothy tropes from the book than the film shows, he is described as the heart of the 118 - which is basically what Dorothy represents in the books and film - she is the one who keeps everyone together, or brings them back together when they have been separated. And if we follow the theming of Gerrard being the wicked witch of the west, it becomes more apparent - in the books Dorothy is enslaved by the wicked witch and forced to carry out menial cleaning tasks - in much the same way we see Chim being treated by Gerrard in Chim begins. It is Chim who we are shown supporting Hen, Buck, and Eddie as they begin their careers at the 118.
The other thing of note - which currently doesnāt fully work, but will if, as I suspect, the wizard of oz references around Eddie are a part of his Queer journey - is that Chimney is the only one of the four members of the team (we are not including Bobby as he is the captain) who has no queer coding in any way and is in a heterosexual marriage. The reason this is important and plays into the idea of Chim being Dorothy is that the term āFriend of Dorothyā is coded speak for being queer - I explain it further in my meta which I linked at the top of this post - the play is that Dorothy herself is not queer, but that her companions on her journey down the yellow brick road are. Which fits Chimney perfectly - with Hen and Buck being Lesbian and bi respectively and with the Wizard of Oz connections to Eddies storylines across the previous seasons and again in the current season being very loud, it feels fair to assume that Eddie will also sit somewhere on the queer spectrum before too long (and really is the reason behind me writing this insanely long post!)Ā
Hen is the cowardly lion. We are shown Hen doubting her abilities at several points throughout the show, but she is arguably the bravest of the 118. The cowardly lionās favoured companion is the hungry tiger (as I wrote about above - we may well see Karen paralleled with the tiger in 804)
But Hen is also Princess Ozma and this is a far more powerful connection. Ozma is the rightful heir to the throne of Oz and spent much of her childhood in the form of a boy called Tip as she had been enchanted by the witch Mombi until Glinda the good witch discovers the enchantment and forces Mombi to return her to her true form and take her rightful place as ruler of Oz. With Bobby filling the role of Glinda, helping Hen achieve her full potential and the allegory of Hen having to hide herself for much of her life until she becomes a firefighter - the wig we see Hen wearing in Hen begins plays into this idea perfectly - that Hen was disguised but has been freed from that disguise and become her true self.
Buck is the scarecrow. But he is also Toto and Captain Fyter. I explained the Captain Fyter connection above in the section on Tommy so I wonāt repeat myself here. Buck is toto for a couple of reasons. Firstly we have the connection to the dog in the plane in season 8 who growls at Jordan and Tia tells him that the dog doesnāt like men, he then becomes friendly when Jordan is ill, but we see him returned to Tia when they leave the plane. this is all a allegory for Buckās bi arc. Tia is Eddie in the scenario and Tommy is Jordan . The dog growling and being protective is akin to Buck growling and becoming jealous over Eddie and Tommys friendship, trying to keep Tommy away from Eddie, but then becoming friendly with Tommy in the same way the dog becomes friendly with Jordan in a therapy dog kind of way before returning to Tia at the end, implying that Buck will always go back to Eddie when it comes down to it. the therapy dog aspect is also interesting as it implies BUck is providing some kind of therapy for Tommy - this could be read as Buck helping Tommy learn and grown (likely in connection with his still undressed past behaviour) - makes him a better person, before they part ways and Buck āreturnsā to Eddie.Ā
Then there is the wizard of oz references - it is Toto who sets much of the plot of the wizard of Oz in motion - by biting Almira Gulch in Kansas in the film version and by hiding under the bed in fright in the book version. It is Toto who reveals the truth of the Wizard of Oz being just a man, and it is Toto who leads The lion, scarecrow, and tin man to where Dorothy is after she has been captured by the wicked witch (in the film - he is less involved in the book!) and it is toto who stops Dorothy from leaving with the Wizard and ultimately leads to Dorothy learning the slippers she wears can carry her home if she clicks her heels together 3 times and wishes to go home. All of these events either play into Bucks arcs in 911 or will potentially going forward. Bucks impulsive ways could be said to mirror Totoās impulsive actions in TWoO and it will be interesting to see if being taken under Gerrard wing leads to him gaining information that helps Hen take down Ortiz!
The biggest connection though is with the scarecrow. The scarecrow has long been associated with bisexuality - due to his line in the film āof course some people go both waysā. in the book the scarecrow also reveals that he lacks a brain but greatly desires one - he is in fact only 2 days old when Dorothy meets him so he is essentially just naive because as the book progresses it becomes increasingly clear he actually is very intelligent and knows many things. One of the other aspects of the scarecrow is his ability to know his own limitations and in the books he becomes ruler of Emerald city, but hands the crown over to Princess Ozma enabling her to take up her rightful position as ruler of all Oz, becoming one of her most trusted advisors. Most of these are traits that Buck shares with the scarecrow - we see season 1 buck reflected in the naijvtie of a 2 day old scarecrow, but once he hits his stride, we see that Buck is actually very intelligent, full of knowledge (random facts wiki Buck!) and comes up with great ideas - things that are being very clearly demonstrated in season 8 so far. He is also becoming much much better at knowing his limitations and that is something I think we will continue to see develop in the way it does in the scarecrow across the books.
And finally we have Eddie. Eddie is the Tin man through and through. The heart metaphors that surround Eddie - especially in season 5 are a very obvious and direct link to the tin man. and Like I said above the Tin man is the most compassionate, sensitive and tender and caring people in Oz. He is incredibly practical and competent as well and undertakes the scarecrows plans readily. He and the scarecrow pair up a lot across the book series and go on adventures together, their heart and brains combining to lead them to success in nearly all cases. The tin man also becomes a trusted advisor to Ozma and is considered to be a fair and wise person in Oz. These are all things we see portrayed in Eddie. He has this tough exterior, but inside he is very soft and tender and he only reveals that side of himself to those he can trust. Eddies heart is a key part of Buck and Eddies dynamic especially in combination with Bucks brains - we are so often shown Buck having an idea and Eddie carrying it out because he trusts Buck - the perfume bee run is just the latest in a long line of them and it is a key aspect of the Tin man and Scarecrow in the Oz books. Iāve spoken above about the other aspects of the tin man and his connection with various characters, but it really is the tin man and scarecrow dynamic that is at the heart of things in the wonderful wizard of Oz book especially (pun intended!!).
All of it plays into the Oz theming weāre being shown in 911 having an important meaning and it is very much connected to Eddie far more than any other character. One can argue that the books - at their core - are about following your heart and letting it lead you to your truth and to home and that is the very heart of Eddies story. Carlaās line about making sure heās following his heart and not Christophers rings very true, and weāve reached a point now where Eddie has to follow his own heart, because Christopher is not in the picture and theyāve chosen to go very very hard with the wizard of Oz metaphors - building on the foundations they already created in previous seasons and now being able to bring them to fruition.
I could literally write about this all day, but this is already ridiculously long and I'm not sure it even makes sense at this point! It was only supposed to be a short post! So Iām stopping here and letting you all go back to your lives - thank you for reading especially if you've made it this far! and let me know your thoughts!šššššŖš
Tagging a few random people just in case they're interested! @buddiediaz118 @buddie911abc @fruityfirehose @sunflowerdigs
Richie as Actor and Director: A Mirror to Carmyās Journey
Just a little fun episode guide, mostly for me and my Richie collection to see how Richie serves as both actor and director in season 4, and what it means for The Bear- both the restaurant and the show.
Richie Shifts Roles
In Season 4, Richie shifts roles. He's no longer just the surrogate director to himself and Carmy's emotional arc this season, he's the actor, stepping into environments Carmy once faced. But Richie responds with growth, an appreciation for Groundhog Day, a clearer understanding of his role, and confidence in letting go of the past.
Richie Mirrors Carmy ā Episode 2
Richieās actorās journey begins in Episode 2, where we first see Carmy sitting alone, sulking over his mistakes. Richie asks if it's performative, almost like a director trying to guide an actor into emotional truth.
This is the last time we really see Richie as a surrogate director for a while. But before Richie steps into his own role as an āactor,ā he delivers one last, uncanny piece of direction to Carmy:
āToday is tomorrow, cousin.ā
He knows Carmy is stuck in groundhog day. Even Carmy, lost in his spiral, seems momentarily shaken out of his thoughts.
Richie is reminding him: youāre not stuck. You donāt have to keep sulking in guilt, shame, or mistakes. You can break the loop.
Itās a line that quietly offers Carmy a way out of his Groundhog Day. And as we learn later in the season, much of the shame Carmy carries stems from not being there for his family at Mikeyās funeral, a silence that haunts him still.
But Richieās message is simple and grounded: Today is all we have.
Carmy can live stuck in yesterdayās pain and expect to live in that cycle the next day or he can choose to show up for today.
Richie always is keen director. But Richie as the actor, although observant, is stuck in his own story.
The episode continues similarly to Carmyās 1x02 moment, with the same music playing. Richie, now in Carmy's role, ends the shift in solitude. He's just as lonely Carmy He watches 3:10 to Yuma and hears the line, āSqueezing the watch wonāt stop timeā ā a mirror of Carmyās struggle with today and the next day.
Later on his sofa, Richie watches Ridley Scott speak on directing and reflects on the importance of knowing the space. It's meta for Richie knowing and learning later on that the vibe will influence the guest and the bear. And if he can fix the environment, he can keep the restaurant going.
Another meta moment in this episode was Richie rehearsing his prep speech for the cast of The Bear. Sydney provides the advice that his direction or movie is too inteelligent, too lofty. Richie points out its elitist (maybe a referencee to the reviews about the show).
Richie's Evolution Through Environment: The Scallop Episode
In Episode 3 Richie is back as director in this episode. Richie realizes and applies what director Ridley Scott says- that when the atmosphere is right, people perform at their best. The Bear is perfect for a night.
Before service, he sets the tone for the show- as Marcus asks how many of these can we do (my opinion, this is Marcus asking about seasons of the show or restaurant), and Richie gives the right advice of living day by day.
What I love about Scallop is that it's an episode where everyone shines at Service as Richie returns as director. Sydney's scallop is the highlight of the episode, carrying hues and shining for the reviewer. As Jessie says, theyāre on pace. The Bear, both the show and the restaurant, embodies what it means to take care of others, to make people happy, and by serving the Italian Beef the bear lets the guests and the viewers in on their family and shared history.
On the night of the service, the environment has a significant impact on Carmy's performance. Richie creates a space where Carmy isnāt overwhelmed by dysfunction, but instead is engaged, caring for the guests and supporting his family, rather than shouting or pushing. He's calm amongst the pressure and pace, taking care of others, creating memories for the family they're serving, making them happy.
Itās something Carmy once deeply wanted, but now believes he no longer has a spark for.
One of the most beautiful moments for me in Scallop- besides Sydney's gorgeous montage- Richie watching Carmy plate the italian beef beautifully and with surprise for a guest. Richie knows Carmy should be thriving here. As Dionās āOnly You Knowā plays, Richie gives this little nod as he watches Carmy love what he's doing.
The lyrics, āI wanna see something that used to be in your eyes again⦠you know itās only a question of when.ā I could cry!
Richie sees at that moment, the light in Carmyās eyes and believes it can exist in The Bear and for Carmy.
But he's still going to step back and let Carmy live his journey.
Episode 5 Replicants: As an actor, Richie is still struggling with attending the wedding, accepting Frank as stepdad, moving on from Tiffany, and coping with the harshness of loneliness.
Richie is still the actor, but the opposite of Carmy. Heās living in the loop, but showing up, he's working, building tentative intimacy with Jessie, and choosing presence.
Richieās Dual Role in Later Episodes
In Episode 6, Richie shifts back to director, offering a psychological analysis of Carmy by reminding the audience that Carmy has a mother's complex
But at the end of Sophie, Richie sees Carmy in a different emotion
Richie ends the episode with his usual parting, but it holds a different meaning , and Happy Thursday is the possibility of Carmy being happy in the family in the restaurant, and out of The Groundhog Day Loop.
In Episode 7, Richie is an actor who initially feels nervous about his performance as a supportive ex-husband. Despite his sadness, he takes on the role of director once again for Frank and Eva, who are scheduled to perform at the wedding. Richie also guides Carmy to the kitchen, where Carmy accidentally connects with Lee. By the end of the episode, Richie embraces his role as the "sand", the director who brings others together.
In Episode 8,. he directs while writing in his notebook. After he writes his director notes, Carmy moves like an actor hitting his mark, turning to Sydney to connect.
Throughout the rest of the episode, he shifts into actor mode as he flirts with Jessie and tries to redirect what happened by saying, āThereās no āI love youā in the workplace.ā
Funny despite being a director, Richie still lacks some self-awareness of the story since he's also acting in it. The surprise that The Bear is a love story reflects this. He seems to be grappling with the ghost of loneliness, which clouds his perspective.
Does he even realize that he is the one who frequently says "I love you" in the workplace?
He'll know soon that love would make the restaurant and show perfect again.
In Episode 9, Richie does not direct until the end because Carmy is absent. When Carmy finally returns, Richie greets him like a director waiting for his lead, asking where he has been and expressing concern about their limited time. Carmy, the actor, communicates to Richie how emotionally "free" or unstuck he feels by talking to his mother.
This is a contrast to the last time Carmy and Richie sat at the table, which was filled with sorrow. But in episode 9- their very last shift, Carmy the actor experiences an emotional breakthrough and becomes more open.
Although Richie kept his distance while directing Carmy, he couldn't help but show a hint of a smile, proud that Carmy is moving forward.
At least with his mother and at least by the next episode with Richie? Sort of.
In Episode 10, Goodbye, the two actors, Sydney and Carmy, become so emotionally full in their scene that Richie has to disrupt the direction the story is taking. But he has little control over the twist these two actors pull.
The last season casts Richie in a new light: his role will be a partnership in the upcoming season. However, he will also, unwillingly, become the director of the chaos between Sydney and Carmy. As he puts it, heāll be the ambassador of a St. Paddyās Day and @turbulenthandholding, @moodyeucalyptus, and I know that any St Paddy's Day in Chicago is a shit show.
The last time we heard about St. Paddy's Day being described as a shit show was by Claire.
But he doesnāt realize that being the ambassador of this upcoming shitshow will actually be a good thing. As a holiday is represented by a color that repsents the good and being on time in the bear.
Richie is the sand. The one who connects.
And next season itās St. Paddyās Day and the clock has run out.
But Richie will direct a beautiful, loving mess of a story, right on time.
Let Him Sin, Let Her Speak: Why Accountability Is The Missing Piece In Jerza (Masterpost)
This is a post that has been building up in the back of my brain for a while now. Itās just I lacked the time to really sit down and think about how to make my thoughts cohesive outside of myself.Ā
But, given the previous post that I madeĀ āThe Real Flaws In Jellalās Redemption Arc : A Breakdownā, I feel that this new post entails the natural development of that conversation.
Though before I get into it, I want to give a disclaimer:
This isnāt an anti-Jerza post.Ā
Nor is it an attack on Erza, Jellal or those who love them.
I love both Jellal and Erza, and respect their characters deeply. However in the same breath, I also think their bond could have been elevated significantly if the writing had allowed for emotional honesty, narrative integrity, and character agency.
This is first and foremost a structured critique that promises to try and be as objective as possible.
This is not a personal attack.
Itās about delving into what could have made both of their respective arcs stronger and more satisfying.
And it starts with the one missing piece: Accountability.
⦠āāāāāāāāāāāā ā¦
To begin this, letās start with defining what Jerza is and what makes it so beloved in the hearts of many:
Jerza is without a doubt one of Fairy Tailās most emotionally charged pairings.
Representing devotion, redemption and the power of forgiveness ā itās a relationship forged in trauma, distance and unspoken love. For this reason, it holds a special, near sacred, place in the hearts of countless fans.
But.Ā
Because it carries that weight, it also carries responsibility.
If Jerza is meant to reflect healing and emotional endurance, then the writing needs to support that with clarity, accountability and growth.
Without these things, the dynamic risks becoming more symbolic as opposed to sincere.
Though, before I get into the whole breakdown of this, there is something I would like to mention:
Of all my time spent in the Fairy Tail/Jerza fandom, I always see one of two arguments surface in regards to critiquing Jerza/Jellal.
That being:
āJellal is evil/abusive/cowardly (???) ā - Often a surface-level, Erza-centric view that ignores his context and inner conflict.
āJerza is perfect, leave them aloneā - A blind defence of the pairing that resists any narrative critique.
Why I bought this up is because the argument I bring today falls under neither extremes.
What I want to talk about is a perspective I rarely (if not ever) see being discussed. And it surprises me that it isnāt really addressed in spaces where Jellal, Erza, their past or their future is spoken about.
So I hope whatās defined in this post below will bring a new perspective to the table and invite new discussion too.
Once again though, before I get into the conversation, I would like to reiterate myself so that neither my intent nor words are misconstrued; to say that Iām not here to tear down Jerza.Ā
But neither am I here to defend it blindly.Ā Ā
Iām here to explore what could have made it stronger. What could have made Jellalās arc more coherent. And what could have made Erzaās emotional journey feel more whole.Ā
Though before continuing, I want to clarify something important:Ā
I'm not here to tell anyone how to enjoy or interpret Jerza, Erza or Jellal. Everything I discuss beneath is just a perspective I came to over time ā something I needed to voice for my own understanding.Ā
If this post disrupts your peace with the ship or the characters and you love them as they are, itās completely okay to disengage. Thereās no pressure to agree and no obligation to read further at all.Ā
I simply wanted to put this out into the world and offer a different lens to think through ā for those who might need or want it.
But, if even after this disclaimer you decide to read on, I hope my words give youĀ something worthwhile to take away for all the time spent.
What I share today is a critique born from care, not condemnation.
With that all said, letās get into it.Ā
ā āāāāāāāāāāāā ā
Below I've broken the long post into separate, hyperlinked sections so you can read at your own paceāhopefully making it feel less overwhelming.
Quick note: This meta was originally written in 10 parts (as in my Google Doc), so youāll see me refer to Parts 1ā10 throughout. For readability and Tumblr formatting, Iāve grouped them into 5 larger segments (Parts IāV). Nothingās been cutāeach post still includes all the content, just reorganized to make things easier to read without breaking the flow.
I just wanted to make mention of this because I know the numbering might be a little confusing at first glanceāespecially if youāre jumping between posts or comparing it to the original doc. Hopefully, this clears it up before diving in.
⦠⦠ā¦
ā Part I: Jellalās Accountability & Erzaās Emotional Cost
(Covers Parts 1 & 2)
Jellalās arc examined not just in isolation, but through how the absence of accountability ripples into Erzaās journey.
⦠~3.9k words ā ā§ approx. 20 min read
ā Part II: Victimhood, Idealization & Jerzaās Fracture
(Covers Parts 3 & 4)
Unpacking the āJellal as victimā lens and how it weakens Jerzaās foundation without meaningful self-confrontation.
⦠~5.9k words ā ā§ approx. 30 min read
ā Part III: The Lost Arc ā What Could Have Been
(Solo Part 5)
A look at the emotional and narrative potential for real growth ā and how it was denied by skipping the hard parts.
⦠~2.8k words ā ā§ approx. 15 min read
ā Part IV: Romantic Tropes & Fandom Avoidance
(Covers Parts 6 & 7)
Why accountability is often sidestepped in writing and fandom, and how the "love fixes everything" trope quietly unravels character work.
⦠~3.6k words ā ā§ approx. 20 min read
ā Part V: Possibility, Reflection & The Path Not Taken
(Covers Parts 8, 9 & 10)
What the narrative becomes when accountability is erased, and a call for deeper storytelling ā for Jellal, Erza, and the readers who see themselves in them.
⦠~5.1k words ā ā§ approx. 25 min read
ā ā ā
Because of the length of this post and to preserve its essayic flow, this meta ā though presented in five parts ā is divided into two main sections for thematic clarity.
Section I ā Foundations & Fallout
Focuses on character accountability, emotional cost, and the narrative weight of what was left unresolved in Jellal, Erza, and Jerza.
⦠Part 1ā5: Character Accountability & Narrative Potential This first segment focuses on:
Jellalās personal arc (Parts 1ā3)
Its emotional impact on Erza and the Jerza bond (Parts 2 & 4)
The missed opportunity for growth through accountability (Part 5)
Core themes include:
Emotional integrity
Missed growth
The damage caused by lacking resolution
What the story avoids addressing
Section II ā Patterns & Possibility
Shifts into broader territory: the narrative and fandom mechanisms that avoid accountability, idealize harmful tropes, and reduce emotional depth. It closes with reflection and a call for better storytelling.
⦠Part 6ā10: Fandom Psychology, Narrative Design & Meta Reflection The second segment shifts focus toward:
Why the issue of accountability is avoided (Part 6)
How fandoms and stories enable or romanticize that avoidance (Part 7)
What happens when accountability is erased (Part 8)
A push for better narrative design and emotional depth (Part 9)
Closing thoughts and space for discussion (Part 10)
Core themes include:
Narrative avoidance
Toxic tropes and idealized love
Reader engagement and critical interpretation
A call for deeper, more honest storytelling
If any of these themes speak to you, please feel free to read on and explore the sections that followāeach one building on the last to unpack what accountability could have meant for these characters, and why its absence matters.
⦠Continue on to the beginning of Section I:
ā Part I ā Jellalās Accountability & Erzaās Emotional Cost
[ primavera, 03Ć02 - long analysis, script annotation, and character discussion below the cut ] || [ tags :: @lesbian-hannibal @shatteredlesbian @craqueluring ] || [ why are my scripts slowly losing quality :( ]
āāāāā
the main-focus of this episode is the aftermath of mizumono { 02Ć13 }. it starts with will's nightmare of the ravenstag that we can now safely assume is how will's mind perceives the ripper ā as he says, he can feel the ripper, but he can't put a face to the name. the ravenstag, which follows hannibal's (or the ripper's, if you want to get technical) kills, appears to will in his empathic vision, which is of antony dimmond and hannibal's broken heart. will was, partly, half a victim to the ripper, which might be why he sees the stag ā and why he doesn't see hannibal, because though he knows the two are one and the same, subconsciously, he denies the connection.
as he later says to chiyoh, the ripper left him with a smile ā a cut so precise, a gutting so clean, that it was easily repaired. hannibal didn't mean for will to die in that kitchen, just to bleed beside the body of their daughter. to watch his blood pool with hers as she embraces death - his punishment, to blur with abigail and carry her with him. abigail's voice, who we now know is really dead, pulls him out of it.
this is still part of his vision. he starts off by telling her he feels closer to hannibal here ā not here, in the church, with the ripper's tableau to him in front of him, but here in his mind palace as he surveys the murder. in this scene in particular, he's defending himself to the memory of abigail - telling her that he feels close to him, despite what he'd done; telling her that he wouldn't know where he'd be without him. but that's the thing ā she's only the memory will has of her. his subconscious. he's defending his feelings for hannibal to himself; here in his mind palace, it's the surface of will's mental curtains trying to appeal to the shadow beyond them.
abigail asks what will believes the tableau is about, what he believes hannibal is trying to tell them. he says it's his broken heart ā his way of showing remorse for what he'd done, of showing how will's betrayal had affected him as well. the skepticism from abigail is a mirror of will's - but now, will knows better. hannibal knows him intimately, and will can recognize that, and he voices that to abigail. she tells him that hannibal misses them, but will, as portraying his surface level, doesn't agree.
instead, he tells abigail that hannibal has always had multiple motives for something ā one of which always being his amusement. he's saying that maybe one of the factors is that hannibal misses them, and maybe a few more might be that he wanted to lure will in, or that he wanted to toy with will ā that he was playing with him. it's something he can believe, both parts of him.
this is where i remind you that the abigail will is talking to you doesn't exist. she's nothing but a memory, a projection of himself that he's trying to appeal to.
he asks her if she still wants to leave with hannibal - which is a clue that he's talking to himself, because he knows abigail can't. he's asking himself if he honestly still wishes to run away with hannibal, and of course he does. trying to assuage that thought, to keep it out of mind, he tells abigail that hannibal took her from him. it took me a while to understand what he meant, if we're going off my idea that abigail is will trying to bargain with himself, but i may have an idea.
i think what abigail represents, like i said, is the shadow beyond the curtain. will's rare gift ā he gave it to hannibal, and in mizumono, hannibal cut ties with him. he gave that rare gift back. he gave will the feeling of autonomy, of being in control of the shadow beyond his curtains ā and by luring him to italy and taking up space in his mind palace again, he is taking will's gift once again and taking away his sense of normalcy. he's taking away will's comfort in his own skin, pushing him into his becoming.
will is beginning to feel guilty for what he'd done ā the surface of the curtain is ruffling, just for a moment in sync with the shadow beyond it. he aches for what could have been, what should have been ā what he could have had with them. he's looking for comfort in himself.
i think it's really interesting when will says hannibal made a place only for abigail ā "a place was made for you, abigail. the only place i could make for you." if we're still going by my idea that abigail is will's shadow, this means that hannibal had made a place only for what lived behind the curtains; he'd been sure of tearing them down and disposing of them, and taking only the will behind the curtains into their new life.
this is where will begins to bleed into the shadow beyond the curtains. his resignation to the fact that hannibal had built only one place for him, his ache to run away with him regardless, has pushed him through the curtains to embrace himself.
the cut opens, and blood pours out. the image of her is dying ā the divide between the surface and the shadow is disappearing, blurring into each other, and will doesn't try and stop it this time.
this is his becoming.
and, of course, who else is there to watch his becoming than hannibal? he's embraced the shadow, pulled those curtains aside and let the light in. his focus becomes less on himself and more on the man who drove him to it.
hannibal, projected by will's mind, allowing him to watch as his final push sends will off the (proverbial) cliff.
once will has mentally put abigail to rest, we're sent to a series of flashbacks. it shows will clinging to life and abigail succumbing to death; finalizing will's punishment from hannibal and setting the pace for the entanglement of will and abigail.
abigail's preparation and will's hospital visit are smashed together in intercut flashbacks, showing the differences between them.
will's is quick, rushed and rabid; a desperate bid to save a life. abigail's is slow, thorough ā which is a mirror of their injuries, even; abigail's throat cut in a quick motion and will's abdomen gutted in slow, precise drags. she is taken apart while will is put back together ā another mirror of the treatment they endured from hannibal, with abigail being made a place in the world and will's curtains being taken down.
their operations are performed in near reverse of each other, with will being sewn up and returned to normal, and abigail being deconstructed and laid to rest.
they finish on the same note ā which, oddly, is the pluck of a cello string, which seems reminiscent of tobias and his methods of killing. maybe i'm reading too far into it, but ending abigail's life with a cut throat the way tobias played the orchestrator's vocal chords like a cello ā while tobias was meant to be a mirror of will, and abigail was his daughter? i'll probably have to do a deeper analysis of that.
and then will comes to his senses in the church.
what makes me further believe that the conversation with subconscious-abigail was will's becoming is how will responds here. the lines between he and hannibal have blurred ā he doesn't know where he ends and hannibal begins. he's stepped into the ripper's mindset for this tableau, and he can't step out, because that's where he's meant to be.
he even looks, again, in the murals for hannibal. even after the betrayal from both men, the urge to be seen by him ā no matter the reason, but especially as he's profiling ā is still there.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Qualityā Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Actually, let's talk about the Baba Yaga storyline
...And how much I fucking loathed it.
(A discussion of tropes, narrative choices, and how goddamn dirty The Witcher Netflix did Yennefer in S2.)
So this subplot is actually a pretty tidy object lesson in literary tropes, and why writers need to understand how tropes work in order to utilize them effectively. The trope at play here is the "Faustian bargain" or "deal with the devil," in which a character barters with a powerful supernatural creature of dubious moral alignment in order to gain something they desire (often something self-serving like wealth or power), at a price that's almost never worth it.
...It is pretty much a given that you will not be getting the better end of the deal, as itās written. But there are a number of different ways to play this trope, and they each say something different about the kind of character who would take that bargain:
1) If you don't realize this is a trap -- if that sounded like a Pretty Sweet Deal!Ā š -- then you're either very naive or very dumb.
2) If you know it's a trap, but expect to get your prize and then weasel out of it with your soul intact anyway, because you think you're cleverer than this eldritch creature you're dealing with -- then you are very cocky, and probably wrong, because modern narratives don't tend to reward hubris.
3) If you know it's a trap, but you think you can get what you want without consequences to you, because you can pay the price with someone else's life or soul -- then you are evil. (And probably also wrong, because it's rare in fiction that you can commit an evil like that without doing some sort of spiritual damage to your own soul.)
4) And lastly, if you know it's a trap, but you are in such desperate, dire straits that even this self-evidently bad bargain looks like your best option -- then it might still be a mistake, but it's the one that audiences are most likely to forgive you for, or at least find understandable.
I don't make the rules.Ā Those are just the audience reactions you can expect from playing the trope in those particular ways -- and if you want a different audience reaction (say, you want forgiveness for character who tried to sacrifice someone else), then you have to put in some extra work to make that happen, mitigating circumstances, etc (say, that the character genuinely believes it's the only way to save a greater number of lives).
--
So how did TWN play Yennefer's Faustian bargain with Baba Yaga?
E2 - Yen and Francesca and Fringilla meet Baba Yaga in her spirit realm or whatever, and she dangles their Heart's Desire, For A Price in front of them. Yennefer doesnāt ask for her magic, because at that point she doesnāt realize sheās lost it.
E3 through E5 - Yennefer tries without success to get her magic to work again. I don't recall any mention of Baba Yaga during that time -- it doesn't even occur to Yennefer as a means of getting it back.
E5 - Yennefer and Jaskier are being pursued by hooligans or something, and even though Yen has ducked into a brothel to hide and is nominally safe, that's when she decides to contact Baba Yaga for help. She gets whisked off to the spirit realm again, and agrees to give Baba Yaga a particular kid in exchange for getting her powers back.Ā
She agrees to this deal knowing that she'll be sacrificing someone's child to this creature.
(And, critically, a point Iāll come back to later: she hasn't signed anything yet. She doesn't get her powers back here. That's the reward being promised for after she feeds a kid to a demon.)
E6 - Yennefer actually meets Ciri, but, notably, does not immediately swear off the plan. She's just kinda ~conflicted~ about it now.
(This was also the episode where they started trying to have Yennefer and Ciri do their mother-daughter bonding, and Yennefer says all the right things, to be sure, but since we-the-audience know that she is at least still contemplating feeding Ciri to Baba Yaga, that, uhh, RINGS KINDA FUCKING FALSE.)
E7 - Ciri reads Yennefer's mind and finds out about the plan to feed her to a demon. (Or so wikipedia tells me, since I have literally no memory of how Yennefer's Baba Yaga related plans got outed.)Ā
E8 - Baba Yaga gets loose, possesses Ciri. Lots of high-drama CG bullshit. Yennefer sacrifices herself to become the host to get Baba Yaga out of Ciri. More CG bullshit, Baba Yaga is vanquished and leaves, and when everyone comes out of their woowoo CG trance, Yennefer has her magic back. But after that BETRAYAL, Geralt can no longer trust her.
--
So, Yennefer losing her powers is actually a subplot I'm entirely onboard for. Whenever a character loses something that is a pillarĀ of their identity, and now has to reckon with who they are without that -- THAT'S THE GOOD SHIT. That's grief. That's loss. That is scattering the pieces of their self and seeing what happens when they have to put themselves back together again.Ā Muah. Delicious fucking food. Peak drama.
We know that Yennefer has been raised to define herself, and stake her entire self-worth, on her magic. It's what she gave up everything for, because they told her it would be worth it, and now she has nothing -- not the magic, not the things she sacrificed for it. Of course she's searching for a way to get it back -- her first reaction is going to be denial and bargaining, not acceptance.
And I can think of two different ways you could play that arc, both of which have the potential for good, meaty character development:
The first (and the one I would have preferred) would have been an arc in which Yennefer discovers who she is without her magic -- that she comes to realize there's more to her than her power, that she's not helpless, that her worth isn't tied to having magic. We get a glimpse of that in the scene where she rescues Jaskier from Rience (my favorite scene in the whole damn season ššš) using her wits instead of her magic, and that was genuinely REALLY COOL -- it's intensely gratifying to see a character being clever instead of just magically overclocked.Ā
They could have carried that through into her meeting Ciri as well, and realizing that she has more to offer Ciri as a mother and a friend than as a mage, that her love and support is worth more than her utilityĀ to Ciri. Yennefer reaches an enlightened understanding where she might well still want her magic back, but she doesn't need it to define herself anymore.
(This shares a lot of beats with disability narratives, and I think the sensitive way to handle it would be to treat it as such.)
The other kind of story would be one in which the character has no interest in reaching that enlightened understanding -- Yenneferās not coming to the "acceptance" stage of loss, because she refuses to accept it. She's searching relentlessly for a cure, chasing down every lead for someone who could fix this, every avenue that might get her what she wants. Then the question becomes, "How far would you go for this? How much are you willing to sacrifice?"
And the answer is everything....... until it's not. And that is the pivotal character-making moment in this kind of story -- when you find out where this character's line is, the line they won't cross even for the sake of the thing they want most in all the world. Where the devil could dangle that oh-so-tempting bargain before them, and they would still say No. No, the cost you're asking isn't worth it, even for this. Yennefer -- who has spent her whole life being coached to be selfish, and has wound up alone and alienated for it -- finally has people she loves enough that she would choose them over herself.
--
TWN kinda went the latter route, but they didn't fully commit to it -- both the plot beats and Yennefer's emotional arc are so muddled that it's not clear what they were trying to say, and both the dramatic impact and the message got completely lost.
Problem 1: Yennefer wasnāt proactive enough.
She's sadĀ about losing her magic, but she's not shown DOING anything about it. This is what I kept yelling at the screen about in E3, when she's just drifting aimlessly around Aretuza in that fucking prom dress and being ~helplessly damseled~ by Stregobor. Send her to the goddamn library to do some research! Show her arguing theory with Tissaia, and refusing to believe that this can't be fixed! Show us HOW BADLY she wants it, and how hard she's willing to fight for it.
Hell, seed the future conflict with Baba Yaga: Yennefer finds an account of someone who acquired their power through a deal with a demon, and she takes is to Tissaia as proof-of-concept, and Tissaia is like, yeah you CAN, but you SHOULDN'T. (Hoe don't do it!) That both establishes it to the audience as a possibility, and preemptively raises the question of what extremes Yennefer will go to in pursuit of this goal.
Problem 2: The stakes were never high enough
As I mentioned above, it's easier to get audience sympathy for a character whoās only making a devil's bargain because they're in extremis -- when something predatory has them over a barrel and is taking opportunistic advantage of the fact that they've got no other options. That hits a nerve with our sense of injustice -- we get angryĀ when we see someone being taken advantage of like. It'll make us root for the character to find a way out of the deal somehow, because even though they agreed to it, we donāt feel that they should be held to that extortionate price.
But Yennefer is never quite desperate enough; the stakes are never quite high enough. She wants her magic back, but at no point does she needĀ it. They never make her desperate enough to justify that bad bargain.
So raise those stakes.
Make it so that Yennefer is in desperate straits when she makes the bargain. She is in a situation that would have been trivial to escape if she'd had her magic, but now she is about to fucking DIE, and there's nothing she can do about it, and yeah, this sketchy creature that's been in her head trying to talk her into this bargain is obviously sketchy A-F, but she either takes its offer, or she dies in the next ten seconds. Them's her only two options.
Because without that level of desperation, her decision instead becomes premeditated, selfish, and stupid.
Problem 3: She needed to NOT knowingly make the evil choice.
Audiences will forgive a Faustian bargain made to save a child, but there's no way to sacrifice a child (or even seriously contemplate it) and come out of that looking good. š¬
The easiest way to fix that would have been for Yennefer to not know what the terms would be when she agreed to the bargain.Ā
To be sure: handing a blank check to that kind of creature is a bad idea, but we've already established that Yennefer needs to be fuckin hard up when she takes that deal; she doesn't have time to negotiate or think it over, she barely has enough time to say yes.
TWN made a big mistake, imo, by not having Baba Yaga give Yennefer her powers back upfront in E5. They made an agreement, yeah, but it did not put Yennefer on the hook, in her debt. Yennefer could still have noped out at any time once she found out what the terms were, since Baba Yaga hadn't given her anything yet.
It would have been far better if Baba Yaga saved her first, restored her magic, and then presented her with the bill -- it becomes a hell of a lot harder for Yennefer to back out at that point.
(And also: get the goods upfront, because why the fuck would you trust that this sketchy creature has any intention of keeping their promise? Whoops, egg on your face, when it turns out you murdered a kid for nothing!)
Furthermore, raise the stakes on what happens if Yennefer doesn't hold up her end of the bargain: that if Yennefer doesn't deliver Ciri to Baba Yaga, then she gets eaten by the demon instead. Itās still evil to murder a child, obviously, but "their life vs my life" is a bit more of a dilemma than "their life vs my magic."
And after she meets Ciri, after Ciri becomes a real person to her rather than an abstraction, then she cannot continue to entertain the possibility of sacrificing her for another episode and a half. Full stop. Yennefer should have immediately started scrambling for "There has to be another way!" The fact that TWN-Yennefer is even still considering it after meeting Ciri says really, really shitty things about her.
(And when she does get caught out, she starts sobbing, I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT YOU WERE TO HIM!!, which is, lol holy shit, not the defense you think it is! "I totally would have sacrificed you without a qualm if you didn't happen to be my fuckboy ex's kid" ??? What?Ā Not "because you matter to me"? Or "because I realized that what I was contemplating was FUCKING EVILā?? And she tells Ciri that to her face?Ā
Writers, did you stop to think about the implications of that line for one half of one hot second??)
Problem 4: Revealing Yennefer's betrayal ahead of time
By having Ciri and Geralt find out about her incipient betrayal before it happens, Yennefer never got to decide for herselfĀ that she wasn't going to go through with it. There needed to be no guilt trips or external peer pressure -- just that she herself thought this over, and decided on her own that Ciri was worth more than getting her magic back.
The fact that it wasn't her choice to come clean about that -- that the choice gets taken out of her hands before it reached the moment when she'd have decide one way or the other -- not only robbed us of what would have been a massively powerful, character-defining moment for her, but also means that we have no proof whether or not she would have done it, if left to her own devices.Ā
Because let's be honest: Yennefer doesn't exactly have a track record of prioritizing other people above herself. Maybe she would have found her conscience in time -- or maybe she wouldn't. (She had, after all, already made this bargain knowing full well that it was going to involve sacrificing someone'sĀ kid.) It is by no means a given that she would have changed her mind.
So what a powerful moment it would have been when Yennefer throws off those teachings that tied her worth to her utility -- when she proves that sheās come to care about other people, and puts their well-being above her own. Imagine the bomb drama if Yennefer had been the one to reveal the bargain to Ciri and Geralt, ideally at the moment when she also reveals that she's rejecting it and taking their side against Baba Yaga, even at the cost of her own life. The moment when her core of steel comes through, and she takes a stand and is willing to face the consequences of her mistake.
That would have been a fantastic climax for Yennefer's character arc in S2: when she decisively shows how much she's changed from the aloof and self-absorbed (and desperately unhappy) woman that she was in S1.
But that's not what TWN gave us. There's no big dramatic moment. I literally do not even remember her sacrifice in the final battle, even though I watched S2 twice, because it got lost amid the boring-and-confusing CGI fight scene that drags on forever. Everything is supposed to be big drama there, and so Yenneferās sacrifice doesnāt stand out.
Moreover, it doesnāt even really feel like Yennefer's choice at that point -- more that she's belatedly trying to clean up her mess, after she's already missed her chance to trade Ciri for her magic. That makes it feel a hell of a lot less sincere, like too little too late. Of-fucking-course she's sorry for it, now, now that it didn't work and everyone's mad at her. Yeah I'm sure she does regret it, now. It's just thatĀ sorry rings pretty hollow at this point.
S2 didn't give her a chance make the right choice for herself -- and as a consequence, Geralt and Ciri will never, ever know for certain what she would have done if circumstances hadnāt intervened. And realistically, there's no way for them to trust her after this; she canāt retroactively prove that she wouldnāt have betrayed them in the end, which casts a doubt that would poison that relationship forever.
--
So.
Breaking down the story into granular detail like this makes it feel almost like nitpicking, but those small situational changes make a hugeĀ difference in what the narrative is telling you about the character, and what kind of person they are. And the audience doesn't need to understand the mechanisms operating behind all of this -- but the writers fucking do. That's their job. To know what the words they write are doing, and the TWN writers manifestly do not. The Baba Yaga storyline is the most egregious demonstration of that, in my opinion, but it's far from the only one.
Through their shoddy execution of a straightforward trope, they made a character we're supposed to love and root for -- whom we want the otherĀ characters in the show to love too -- make choices that were unforgivably, murderously, short-sighted and selfish. Which is pretty obviously not what they meant to say about Yennefer, and not how we as the audience were supposed to interpret her actions, but thatās what they wrote. Thanks, I hate it.
(And worse: half this shit isn't even in-character. Yennefer doesn't fucking waffleĀ like that. She is decisive and proactive to a fault, but this season reduced her to such a passive character who just gets shuffled from setpiece to setpiece. I think she makes all of four proactive decisions in that season -- freeing Cahir, rescuing Jaskier, making the deal with Baba Yaga, and sacrificing herself for Ciri -- and half of them were dumb.Ā
Ugh, it's such bullshit. Yennefer deserved better.)
To be honest, I don't think the season needed the Baba Yaga plot at all, done well or otherwise. It was a misbegotten attempt to pump up fake drama, one that showed a lack of confidence in the story they were telling and a lack of respect for the audience -- like they didn't expect us to care about the found-family story without some cheap ~betrayals~ to spice it up.
But all they succeeded in doing was permanently undermining Yennefer's relationship with Ciri and Geralt, the relationship that is supposed to be one of the bedrocks of the series. Thatās a betrayal you canāt come back from (except by authorial fiat, because they're ~Destined~Ā and so they have to). That's a well that's been poisoned.
And lastly, it puts Yennefer on the defensive now in her interactions with Geralt. Despite the fact that he was the one who overrode her free will by tying them together with djinn, the season ends with her having to grovel for his forgiveness. Geralt is now the one with the moral high ground, the injured party who gets to dispense or withhold forgiveness as he sees fit, and he's not required to make any real acknowledgment, or apology, or amends for what he did to her.
THANKS, I HATE IT.
--
So yeah, there was a lot in S2 that was Some Fucking Bullshit, but that is my narrow-focus deep dive into my single least favorite of their bad-ideas-executed-badly.Ā
Actual real genuine question from someone who has shipped Buddie since the nanosecond Buck turned around to look at the new guy⦠but Iām wondering what makes you feel that canon Buddie is inevitable? Sorry if youāve addressed this before but I just watched the season 5 finale and have pretty much lost all hope at this point so Iām really interested in your side of it.
Hey anon! No worries, I'd be happy to go into my thought process a little. Apologies if this gets long!
So, I should preface by saying I didn't actually start seeing Buck and Eddie as a possible romantic pairing until the back half of s3. And I wasn't set in stone about it until s4. And s5 has just been a rollercoaster ride.
The way I view their relationship I try to view through the lens of every other canon couple I've been a proponent of over the years. Admittedly there is a certain trepidation and hesitancy around Buck and Eddie, just because of what them being together would entail, and the fact that a story like theirs really hasn't been shown on television before. But I think it helps to get down to the foundation of it all, bypassing all of the ready reasons why it "can't" happen or "won't" happen or "will never" happen. I've said before that there is what the script is saying, and there is what the scripts is saying. Foreshadowing and story arcs are represented through scene transitions, music choice, wardrobe, and thematic parallels. Things don't just pop up out of nowhere. There is usually always established precedence for something occurring on the show. I try to think along the lines of what we are being told vs. what we are being shown. For example:
During Eddie's awkward af relationship storyline with Ana, we were being told that he was finally moving on and doing something for himself and had found the perfect addition to his family. We were being shown that there was something dishonest about his approach to dating her and that it wasn't explicitly for himself.
From the minute Buck and Taylor reconnected, we were told that they were both in a similar state of stagnancy regarding relationships and that they had grown and would likely slot together in a more compatible way. We were shown that their core identities had not actually changed and they were careening toward this inevitable dissolution of their relationship.
(putting the rest under a cut to save y'all's dashboards)
I think a lot of people were disappointed after 4x14 as well, which I understood in the context of what we were told (Buck and Taylor kissing and getting together because they're compatible in their goals now), but not in the context of what we were shown (Buck being suspicious right off the bat of why Taylor is waiting for him outside the hospital; Buck not running after Taylor because Ana called to tell him Eddie was awake; The will scene coming after and not before the kiss scene with Taylor).
I could literally go for pages dissecting scenes and transitions and other choices (hmu if you want any of that, it's hiatus season so that means it's peak crackheadery time), but for the sake of not doing that here I'll just mention the two scenes in s5 that really fucking sealed the deal for me:
Eddie holding Buck and Christopher's heart drawings in his hands
Ravi's "a partner should be someone who always has your back" comment to Buck.
Those two choices just . . . kind of floored me, tbh. And they wouldn't be significant if there was not precedence for that significance, because we've seen the extended metaphor of Eddie + hearts since s4, and the concept of partnerships and ideal partners being someone who "has your back" was the literal shooting off point of Buck and Eddie's relationship, and the stated reason Eddie and Shannon didn't work out.
Obviously these are my opinions and my beliefs but I feel pretty good about them. And also there's so much story that has already been told and so much story yet to be told, so I wouldn't give up hope just yet, but I can't singlehandedly convince you of that. I suggest going back and doing a rewatch because sometimes when you consume it all together like that and not piece by piece weekly, it's a lot harder to look away from.
I hope this helped at least a little bit, and if you need anymore clarification or anything else, feel free to reach out! It's hiatus season baby!
(and, yes, I am prepare to eat my words if all of this turns out to be nothing, but I am also prepared to dance upon the graves of all those who doubted. I'm ready for anything.)
Buck has been accused of being self-centered several times in the show, especially in past season. Basically every main character at one point or another has made this claim about him. That criticism became lodged in Buckās mind over the years. How could it not?! The people around him saw his attention-loving daredevil behavior among other things as self-centered (affectionate, because āBuckās gonna Buckā). With Eddie, we saw him make this claim to Buck specifically about their relationship and the strain it caused several times during the lawsuit arc in s3. I think through the previous seasons, Eddie was the most vocal with this criticism and was pretty much the only one to ground this criticism in his PERSONAL relationship with Buck.
In 305 Rage, the infamous grocery store argument:
Buck: Look, man, why canāt you see my side of this?
Eddie: āCause thatās all you see!
And in 306 Monsters during their reconciliation at the firehouse:
Eddie: Lotta āIās in there. Your actions, your choices, they impact the rest of us. Thatās what it means to be part of a team.
And in 309 Fallout during THE Kitchen Scene:
Eddie: Seriously? Youāre gonna make it about you, again?
Basically, Buck took that past criticism to heart, like you do when you care about the people around you and you care about what they think of you to a healthy degree. That brain weasel surfaces in an interesting way in 611 via the coma dream.Ā
But that old criticism takes on a different flavor in coma land, because the dialogue in the episode evokes the idea of a planet circling its star, which lifts it out of the realm of just Buckās ego and places it firmly in the Cosmos/Universe symbolism thatās so interwoven with the Buckley Diaz Family!
In 611, Buck is talking to Hen and Chim about Bobby and then Buckās mind takes and interesting turn:
Buck: My not being at the 118 is what pushed him over the edge.
Hen: Or maybe it was just some random butterfly effect and the entire world doesnāt revolve around you.
Buck: Eddie Diaz.
Hen is BuckāsĀ ārealityā check. In the coma dream, as an echo of Buckās own thought process, she tries to humble him. But somewhere in Buckās mind he also knows that he is deeply loved and that he matters. The whole episode was about him starting to consciously realize and accept that fact so that he could return to his real life and thrive. Heās working to replace his bravado (ultimately a performance on some level) with an understanding that he actually does matter.Ā So, in Buckās coma dream, when Hen evokes the idea of Buck as the sun and everyone else as the world revolving around him, she both echoes old ego wounds AND she creates space in Buckās head for him to figure out that heās not the center of the universe in any grand sense but that he does bring light and love to his loved ones just by being himself, a bright sun. He doesnāt fully get it in terms of Bobby until the end of the ep, but dream!Henās criticism initiates the workshop process of Buck truly seeing his influence in other peopleās lives.
After the Bobby realization starts to percolate, Buck immediately asks about Eddie. It matters that it is immediately after Henās comment about the world not revolving around Buck. Iāll come back to that.
Hen: They said that Diaz was unfit. That he couldnāt be a firefighter and a single dad. He tried to bring him to the firehouse a few times, but Captain Righetti said no.
Buck: [flashback and then] Carla. He never met Carla.
Buck eventually saw his role in Bobbyās life but he dropped the ball with Eddie! Buck thinks that Eddie would have lost Christopher if he never met Carla. Our guy removes himself from that equation entirely. Despite the fact that up to the flashback point in the coma dream, Buck was the one who introduced Eddie and CarlaĀ in the queerest way possible! Buck was the one who assuaged Eddieās fears about Chris during the earthquake and took Eddie to pick up Chris after the earthquake and went to the hospital with Eddie when Abuela broke her hip!!! Buck, it wasnāt Carla who changed Eddieās life; you did that, my guy!! But Buck canāt see it. Not yet.Ā
Back to my point about Buck immediately thinking of Eddie after Hen tells him the world doesnāt revolve around him. So, this is Buckās deep dark subconscious. I took that whole exchange to mean that Buckās world does in fact revolve around Eddie and Chris. In reality, Buck has centered Eddie and Chris since he and Eddie took vows to have each othersā backs in 201. Buck has been doing The Most since that day. He faltered in the lawsuit arc but came back strong and hasnāt wavered even a little since then, dropping everything when needed to be there for his family. The Diazes are the center of Buckās world and some part of him knows that but that part isnāt conscious yet, hence the Chris of it all asking him to help him find his dad plus Chrisā words to him being the signal to his coma brain that he needed to get back to the hospital in order to wake up.
Itās also super important that Buckās thought process while talking to Hen in the coma dream is about Eddie as a single dad in particular. He didnāt think of it as Eddie being without resources/support. No. He framed it as him being a single dad. That means that Buck was aware on some level that he was stepping up and stepping into a co-parenting role for Chris with Eddie!! Some part of Buck knows that he buffered Eddie against the fallout of being a single dad. Abuela had health issues and then moved back to Texas. Tia Pepa had circumstances that limited her involvement with her nephew and Chris. Carla is a paid professional (echoed in her distraction technique with the nurse!) but Buck is Eddieās actual partner in every way. He is the one whoās keeping Eddie from truly being a single dad. Based on Buckās coma dream, I repeat: some part of his beautiful brain knows that!!
Going back to the fandom read that āBuck is the sunā - Eddie and Chris love Buck and heās their light especially in dark times. Weāve seen it repeatedly. It was featured in the scene where Chris and Eddie visit Buck in his room. Heās illuminated by the lamp above the bed while Eddie weeps in the dark. Even in a coma, that man is lighting up their life! But in that particular scene, Buck is a distant sun and Eddie is struggling to feel the light. Chris isnāt though. Heās right there next to the sun drawing him back out. Stars and planets, baby! Between Buck showing up for them in every way and the constant interplay of light and shadow in their scenes, Buck as the sun is pronounced in this episode. I would argue that the reverse is true as well but Buck hasnāt had the full realization that the Diazes are his sun and his family yet. *sigh*
Buck is working out his issues in 611 so that he can show up for himself AND for his family in a fully conscious way. If Chris is the Universe that energizes and holds all things in the Buckley Diaz Family, then Eddie and Buck are worlds, circling each othersā star. I may be taking the metaphor too far but I donāt care lol. Buck is moving from the subconscious awareness that Eddie and Chris are his family to a conscious awareness. Itās so damn beautiful it makes me weep.