#loa ask

No!! Don't do that 😭😭 Sometimes when someone says something incorrectly, I have to correct them despite myself because I cannot let them exist with that misinformation.

And sometimes that comes across as a need to correct rather than educate.

Basically I’ll get to the point it mean the future can effect the past and the past can effect the future what makes that even possible Ik that true bc law of assumption is a thing but wow that’s cool to know!

Mind make posts about time traveling if I did a mistake or want to go back in time or there are millions of ways for it to work that I never thought of since ur persistent on the notion that anything is possible

Okay, so you might be a little confused, but you definitely have the spirit.

The theory you named is different from the theory you are explaining. "All time" theory is actually a concept in Eternalism, commonly known as the "Block Universe" theory or the "All-at-Once" theory.

This theory states that the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. According to this view, time does not "flow" or pass. Instead, the universe is a static, four-dimensional block of spacetime where every event that has ever happened, or ever will happen, is permanently anchored in its specific coordinates.

Now, your point about the past affecting the future and vice versa is actually known as retrocausality, which sits at the intersection of quantum mechanics and the philosophy of time.

It proposes a two-way street for time: not only does the past affect the future (standard causality), but choices made in the future can ripple backward to affect the past.

And while not exactly the same thing, revision uses a similar principle of sorts. You imagine a different past, and that in turn affects how your present as well as your future unfolds.

As for posts on time travel, I'm not really sure how I would go about that, especially because the topic itself feels empirical, while my blog mostly sits somewhere between phenomenology, philosophy, and psychology.

If there are certain things you'd like to know, maybe I could answer them.

Let me also address something else you said. Rightly or wrongly, it seems like you're asking me to provide ways something could work out, and frankly, that's not my job. That's your part.

I am persistent in the notion that anything is possible because IT IS. TO ME. Because that's my assumption and that's how I've made sure my reality works.

Whether that is possible FOR YOU or not depends on your personal beliefs and assumptions.

I totally understand. Sometimes advice can feel impersonal.

To me, meditation is when you do nothing but exist.

Watching the flowers sway is meditation.

Watching the sea is meditation.

Listening to music while focusing on the bass and not singing is meditation too.

I personally do this sometimes.

It's really hard because I intuitively want to sing at the top of my lungs. So I usually pick songs I don't know haha.

thank you!!!!!!

✨✨✨✨✨✨

Hello! Thank you so much for reading and resonating with my blog. Sorry if I barely reply.

The only reason you are stressing about next year's subjects is because you are still looking at your 3D reality and treating it as the absolute truth. You need to remember one thing, your current reality is just an old echo. It doesn't dictate your end result unless you allow it to. If I were in your place, what I would do is just affirm what I want, once, and keep going as usual, doing my daily routine. I would just live knowing that I am already at the end, because it's a fact right now.

In this case, I would affirm: "I'm graduating this year, things will align for it to happen, circumstances don't matter."

Check out this post 🫶

I think a lot of this is something I agree with.

I always say you are the one who is assigning things meaning. Whether something is sabotaging you, something is hindering your manifestation, or something is simply affecting you, you conclude that. You are the one who is accepting that as your current reality.

But I want to point something out.

If contradictions exist, you haven't decided yet. It means you're still in two minds, operating from two different identities. I don't mean a few opposing thoughts. I mean one second you go, “o have it,” and another second you go, “I don't have it.”

This is why people use decide.

It's one or the other.

Most of these concepts were introduced to me through my educational background. Others, I usually work backwards with.

I'll notice a phenomenon within my reality, try to replicate it, and then try to understand the conclusion. From there, I usually find theories or concepts that align with my understanding and explore them further.

I don't browse through social media since I don't have any accounts. I don't even browse Tumblr. Sometimes things appear on my feed and I'll reblog them if I think the message aligns with my framework.

If you want to learn, there are many ways to do so. You don't have to read books if that's not your preferred method. You can watch YouTube videos, listen to lectures, explore articles, or look into the topics that interest you.

You can also learn through things like films by analysing symbolism, themes, and the ideas being presented.

There isn't a lack of resources or methods available, especially in this day and age where information is available at your fingertips.

Your posts about nervous system regulation and emotional regulation have really helped me, by the way. Thanks a lot 😊

I'm so glad I could help!!

Opposing thoughts are completely normal.

The best way to work with them is to acknowledge the thought and then correct it.

An opposing thought appearing does not mean you agree with it or that it has any power over you.

I think you've confused yourself and me.

Why would they not exist?

This idea would only become confusing if someone were mixing individual consciousness and collective consciousness. Those are two different frameworks.

With individual assumptions, people are not experiencing the exact same reality in terms of perception, beliefs, circumstances, and interpretations.

If you are experiencing the world through your own assumptions, that also means everyone else is experiencing the world through their own assumptions.

You are essentially saying that someone who does not share the same assumptions as you cannot exist within the same reality, but that does not follow from the idea of individual perception.

A billionaire's experience of reality is drastically different from someone who has never seen a million in their lifetime.

They exist in the same world, but their experiences and perceptions of it are completely different.

And using the same logic, wouldn't deniers also be able to assume all believers away?

The reasoning would apply both ways.

As for why science cannot prove it, I don't exactly know what you mean by that. Prove what?

Furthermore, I will not be answering any more of the "why can't science prove it" questions.

I have explained them in various ways across my blog. Read them. Do your own research.

If you have further discussions or questions, I would be happy to chime in.

But do not expect me to spoon-feed you information that is very easily available with a few clicks.