Lambydal did not take anything from Belltria, let alone an OC. The OC in Question is the character in Lambydance YouTube banner. That character is actually not just a character, it's her persona. So it's Lambydances drawing of herself.
So Belltria is trying to claim ownership of Lambydances appearance because Belltria believes that the persona looks more like her than it does the literal creator and that LD based the character off of her, Belltria.
If both Belltria and LD use Disney style as the foundation of their style, then how can Belltria claim that LD took from her? They both use Disney style as a foundation for their art style, (or at least LD did. Her current accounts are unknown including by Belltria so nobody knows what style LD uses now.)
To add, it doesn't matter at all what so ever if Belltria is older than LD. She probably only brings it up because she probably thinks that means she's been doing art longer however anybody can start doing art at any age. To add, it doesn't matter how old some is or when they started doing art because that has zero impact on when two artists meet each other.
Belltria continues to refer to the character as an OC when it is in fact a persona, a self portrait. So LD didn't just imagine up this character, she drew herself. And if it's so easy and likely that Belltria also came up with the same idea then how come she never drew it up until a few years after LD posted that persona? Belltria didn't ONCE draw a character like LDs persona until this year, 2025. So how did LD steal from Belltria exactly? Did LD time travel??
It's extremely bold of Belltria to suggest that LD used her art as a base or traced it when the lineart in LDs art wouldn't line up at all to anything Belltria has ever drawn. Belltria must not understand what tracing is if she thinks that LD traced her art or used it as a base.
And if Belltria has had that OC for such a long time then where or where is there any evidence?? There is none and will never be because rule #1. Iykyk.