Consumer group calls for caramel color ban
Killer Cola?
by Dr. Jonathan Wright
Picture for a moment a can of cola ā Coke, Pepsi, a generic brand simply named āCola,ā it doesnāt matter what it says on the can. Theyāre all more or less the same, right? Fizzy, cola flavorā¦and that deep brown hue provided by ācaramel coloring.ā
You know, itās funny ā I just happen to be eating a (rather tasty) homemade caramel as I write this. (Seriously, I didnāt plan that!)
But the coloring used in that soda (and other foods) has just about zero in common with the sticky confection I just popped in my mouth. My treat resulted from the kitchen magic of heating sugar in a saucepan, while the stuff in cola is made through a high-pressure and -temperature reaction between sugar and ammonia and sulfites.
Yum, yum.
The reaction that results in ācaramelā (quotes because, face it, that aināt caramel) coloring also forms 2-methylimidazole (2-MI) and 4 methylimidazole (4-MI). In government studies, these beauties caused several types of cancer (lung, liver, thyroid) in lab animals.
Theyāve been deemed animal carcinogens, which usually means a compound is a cancer threat for humans, too. 4-MI also appears on Californiaās list of āchemicals known to the state to cause cancer.ā
And there are significant levels of these carcinogenic compounds in at least five brands of cola, according to researchers at the University of California, Davis. The levels of 4-MI in these drinks may be causing thousands of cancers.
As the executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest put it, these have no place in the food supply, especially considering theyāre only there for cosmetic reasons. So theyāve petitioned the FDA for a ban of colorings made through the ammonia process.
When consumer advocacy website The Consumerist reached out to Coke and Pepsi for comment on the petition, they were passed along to the ABA instead. Of course, all of this didnāt sit too well with the American Beverage Association.
They argue that 4-MI is ānot a threat to human health.ā Instead, they claim that the Center for Science in the Public Interest is out to get them ā that theyāre dedicated to attacking the food and beverage industry (just for fun, I guess?).
Plus, they say, 4-MI is in almost everything! So, why pick on Coke and Pepsi, huh? (Which isnāt whatās being done ā a ban on ācaramelā coloring would affect a wide variety of products.)
And of course they wrap it all up by reminding us that safety is their number one concern! Thanks, ABA! I guess thatās why high fructose corn syrup is inā¦oh, just about everything!
Iām not sure how this will pan out, but I highly doubt weāll be waving goodbye to that cola color anytime soonā¦in the meantime, I think Iāll continue to stick with good olā water (and my morning cup of coffee!).
Sources: āFDA Urged to Prohibit Carcinogenic āCaramel Coloring,āā Center for Science in the Public Interest (www.cspinet.org) āAmerican Beverage Association Responds To Call For Ban On Caramel Coloring In Cola,ā The Consumerist (www.consumerist.com)








