Do NOT listen to it on any platform that gives her money- Spotify, YouTube, Apple Music, etc. If you must listen to it, wait for it to be reuploaded somewhere that doesn't put money directly in her pockets.

She is an ageplayer, rapist, and abuser- to animals and humans. She reposted CSAM of 17-year-old Jennette McCurdy when she was 20, on the very site you're reading this on. She talked to and hung out with underage children as an adult. She even moved Lucy Loone into her house when the latter was 14 (and the fact Lucy only left when they were 18 makes this even MORE suspect.) She sold shitty, overpriced merch, including cups that contained LEAD. She's used AI to generate "art." She cosplays other people's trauma as her "aesthetic." She's a "feminist" and yet glorifies misogynistic principles in her music. She claims she "goes into debt for her art," and yet she shops at Erewhon and lives in a $2,000,000, 5-bedroom house with a custom pool in San Fernando Valley, where all the other rich people live. She's lead to ENTIRE communities of young girls online being taken advantage of and groomed- the very thing she's apparently so against. Even without all that, she's rude, pretentious, and shitty in general. Everything she does is performative.

I hate to have to make multiple posts about this, but seeing how many people are changing their tune about her and going back to her fanbase, I feel we need a reminder of her actions. Her Spotify numbers were decreasing, but they've seen a slight rebound, which worries me. A shitty rebrand cannot distract us from all of this.

Original drawing by yours truly @h.ereticc on IG

Education plays a major role in shaping how individuals think, adapt, and function in society. Knowledge serves as a bridge that connects learning inside the classroom to real-life experiences, helping students understand the world beyond academics. Because of this, changes in the education system greatly affect how prepared students are for the future.

The enhanced Senior High School curriculum is an updated program that focuses on skills development, technology, and real-life preparation. The ideal outcome of this curriculum is to make Senior High School students more “job-ready,” since some students plan to work immediately after finishing high school and enter the real world as early as possible.

From my perspective, this newly updated curriculum can help prepare students for life after high school. With more time allotted for practical application and the proposed 420–640 hours of work immersion, students may gain more knowledge, experience, and independence when working in real-life settings. However, this does not yet guarantee that it will be better than the previous curriculum. According to posts from the Department of Education (DepEd), pilot testing will be conducted in 70 schools, both public and private, to determine whether the new version is more effective than the old one. Despite its promising goals, this shows that the curriculum is still in its testing phase and remains more of a concept than a proven solution.

There are also deeper issues beyond the curriculum itself, particularly concerning the people responsible for implementing and managing it. In the past, the promised outcomes of the K–12 curriculum did not fully meet expectations due to various factors, such as the lack of properly trained educators and insufficient teaching resources. In addition, social problems within schools, such as bias and nepotism, continue to exist despite promises of improvement.

In addition, there is a greater need to understand the people within the education system itself, especially from a psychological perspective. The system is often filled with promises, yet many issues remain unresolved because individuals have different ideas, motivations, and interests. Studying these human factors may help in developing more realistic and effective solutions.