#justiceforfdholders

Wake Up, Investors! When “AA+” Really Means “Ask Again” — Piramal’s DHFL Heist Exposed by DebaprasadBandyopadhyay Via Flickr: An once AAA-rated, profitable DHFL was grabbed for peanuts, while lakhs of small investors and depositors were left with massive losses. Legal battles continue, serious questions remain — yet ratings call it “stable”. This is manufactured trust. Before touching any Piramal stock (especially #PiramalFinance) — pause. Dig deeper. Your hard-earned money is not a gamble for crony deals and regulatory silence. I’m sharing this despite repeated reluctance to support online, non-violent civil disobedience movements, even as they’ve gone international across 15+ viral platforms (stats available). What holds us back is fear, apathy, and self-censorship under an oligarchic BJP-led regime. Let’s be clear: without organised opposition, we won’t get back our money or our rights. Farm laws were stopped by collective resistance of the farmers. Sanchar Saathi's surveillance rolled back due to public pressure. Aravalli resistance forced judicial reconsideration. The lesson is simple: Educate. Agitate. Organise. Act. Not talk. Action. Whenever there’s a sustained movement, the BJP steps back. Please share this campaign poster, especially with those active in stock markets and finance. Silence protects power. Collective action creates accountability.

One Rupee, Piramal Finance, and the Ruins of DHFL: A Letter to Mr. Ajay Piramal by DebaprasadBandyopadhyay Via Flickr: onceinabluemoon2021.in/2026/01/09/one-rupee-piramal-finan... This open letter to Ajay Piramal interrogates the moral dissonance between Piramal Finance’s “Neeyat” advertising campaign, which celebrates honesty through the return of a single rupee, and the lived reality of DHFL depositors whose life savings were erased through a deeply contested insolvency process. By juxtaposing corporate virtue-signalling with the transfer of nearly ₹45,000 crore of DHFL assets for ₹1, the text argues that legality has been deployed to eclipse legitimacy, and branding to obscure accountability. Situating the DHFL resolution within a wider system of crony capitalism, opaque political financing, captured institutions, and manufactured consent, the letter frames the episode as part of a broader legitimation crisis in BJP-ruled India, where ethics are subordinated to power and proximity. At its core, the piece demands that “conscious capitalism” be measured not by advertisements or philanthropy, but by what is returned to those who trusted, funded, and were dispossessed.

Wake Up, Investors! When “AA+” Really Means “Ask Again” — Piramal’s DHFL Heist Exposed by DebaprasadBandyopadhyay Via Flickr: An once AAA-rated, profitable DHFL was grabbed for peanuts, while lakhs of small investors and depositors were left with massive losses. Legal battles continue, serious questions remain — yet ratings call it “stable”. This is manufactured trust. Before touching any Piramal stock (especially #PiramalFinance) — pause. Dig deeper. Your hard-earned money is not a gamble for crony deals and regulatory silence. I’m sharing this despite repeated reluctance to support online, non-violent civil disobedience movements, even as they’ve gone international across 15+ viral platforms (stats available). What holds us back is fear, apathy, and self-censorship under an oligarchic BJP-led regime. Let’s be clear: without organised opposition, we won’t get back our money or our rights. Farm laws were stopped by collective resistance of the farmers. Sanchar Saathi's surveillance rolled back due to public pressure. Aravalli resistance forced judicial reconsideration. The lesson is simple: Educate. Agitate. Organise. Act. Not talk. Action. Whenever there’s a sustained movement, the BJP steps back. Please share this campaign poster, especially with those active in stock markets and finance. Silence protects power. Collective action creates accountability.

One Rupee, Piramal Finance, and the Ruins of DHFL: A Letter to Mr. Ajay Piramal by DebaprasadBandyopadhyay Via Flickr: onceinabluemoon2021.in/2026/01/09/one-rupee-piramal-finan... This open letter to Ajay Piramal interrogates the moral dissonance between Piramal Finance’s “Neeyat” advertising campaign, which celebrates honesty through the return of a single rupee, and the lived reality of DHFL depositors whose life savings were erased through a deeply contested insolvency process. By juxtaposing corporate virtue-signalling with the transfer of nearly ₹45,000 crore of DHFL assets for ₹1, the text argues that legality has been deployed to eclipse legitimacy, and branding to obscure accountability. Situating the DHFL resolution within a wider system of crony capitalism, opaque political financing, captured institutions, and manufactured consent, the letter frames the episode as part of a broader legitimation crisis in BJP-ruled India, where ethics are subordinated to power and proximity. At its core, the piece demands that “conscious capitalism” be measured not by advertisements or philanthropy, but by what is returned to those who trusted, funded, and were dispossessed.

One Rupee, Piramal Finance, and the Ruins of DHFL: A Letter to Mr. Ajay Piramal by DebaprasadBandyopadhyay Via Flickr: onceinabluemoon2021.in/2026/01/09/one-rupee-piramal-finan... This open letter to Ajay Piramal interrogates the moral dissonance between Piramal Finance’s “Neeyat” advertising campaign, which celebrates honesty through the return of a single rupee, and the lived reality of DHFL depositors whose life savings were erased through a deeply contested insolvency process. By juxtaposing corporate virtue-signalling with the transfer of nearly ₹45,000 crore of DHFL assets for ₹1, the text argues that legality has been deployed to eclipse legitimacy, and branding to obscure accountability. Situating the DHFL resolution within a wider system of crony capitalism, opaque political financing, captured institutions, and manufactured consent, the letter frames the episode as part of a broader legitimation crisis in BJP-ruled India, where ethics are subordinated to power and proximity. At its core, the piece demands that “conscious capitalism” be measured not by advertisements or philanthropy, but by what is returned to those who trusted, funded, and were dispossessed.