#jackal barks

The Misunderstood Defense of Fictional Freedom

Proshipping is often painted as advocacy for the problematic content itself. When in reality, it is advocacy for the right to depict it without censorship. It is not an endorsement of harmful actions in real life, but an insistence that fiction be allowed to explore dark, uncomfortable, and morally ambiguous territory without creators being doxxed, harassed, or blacklisted. Just as fiction can include murder, war, betrayal, or abuse to tell a compelling story, it can also include controversial romantic dynamics that reflect, distort, or subvert real experiences.

The core argument is simple: fiction is not reality. The exploration of disturbing or taboo topics in fiction is not a gateway to real-world harm, but a vehicle for catharsis, criticism, or even creative experimentation. To ban certain types of ships or themes because they make you uncomfortable is to deny the beauty of human imagination and to assume that your moral compass should govern others.

Censorship Is Never Neutral

The danger of content policing is not just that it silences one ship, one kink, or one work. It sets a precedent. If problematic fiction must be purged because it offends some sensibilities, what happens when wholesome fiction offends others? Should we ban depictions of traditional marriage because it excludes queer people? Should we remove every strong mother character because someone had a toxic mother?

If we let discomfort become the measure for what is allowed, we quickly lose all cultural nuance. Discomfort is personal, not universal. It cannot be the basis for objective censorship because no two people are disturbed by the same things.

Once you open the door to banning fiction that offends you, you give others permission to ban fiction that comforts you. That is the trap.

The Real Harm Is Harassment, Not Fanfiction

The anti-proship movement often claims it is protecting minors or survivors, but the reality is, this rhetoric often conceals and enables harassment. People are harassed, outed, fired, or even threatened for drawing or writing fictional scenarios. Creative freedom is sacrificed in the name of online purity tests, and fandom becomes less about shared joy and more about surveillance and shame.

Survivors are not a monolith. Some may be hurt by content others find cathartic. Some, such as I, may write “dark” fanfiction as a way to process trauma. It is deeply condescending to assume all survivors want the same thing or that they need to be shielded from art as if they cannot make decisions for themselves.

True advocacy means defending the agency of everyone, including those who use fiction in ways you wouldn’t.

Let Fandom Be Wild and Free

Fandom has always been a space for the strange, the subversive, and the self-indulgent. From the early days of slash fic to today's proship communities, fandom thrives when creators are allowed to explore without fear. Policing taste, genre, or morality does not protect anyone. It just narrows the creative field until only the most sanitized, corporate-safe stories remain.

Supporting proshipping is not about endorsing every work created under its umbrella. It’s about defending the right to make those works. You don’t have to read them. You don’t have to like them. But if you demand their erasure, you’re siding with control and not community.