this is from the 2010 script and i think it’s vitally important despite not being canon
so bob grey / IT is trying to do richie here right? and i think that is so important because despite the fact that that fact doesn’t align with richie in the novel, it does align with someone else (eddie!)
and so richie being canonly gay in this script is super important because the clues and little scenes pulled from the book r like “oh i’m not stupid for thinking that the blowjob leper scene in the novel symbolizes fear of disease through sexuality”
AND richie’s sexuality actually being in existence here is SO IMPORTANT! in the movie like yeah im eating all the crumbs i can get but he is never outwardly stated as gay.
homophobes still have a way to deny it because it’s not ever said aloud. like i think with a lot of queer coded characters in todays film there’s this issue where their sexualities are just implied.
it’s supposedly a “win win” sort of situation because people can still deny it so nobody can really be mad for inclusivity but people can analyze it!
and i think that’s great i know how to pick up on queercoding considering i’m queer but i wish that there was maybe just a “fuck…i loved him” in the quarry when he’s crying or something idk











