hi! im the anon who sent in the original “frequently hungover..ok” ask in and i see that it was taken as if i was being negative towards armie? i said “ok” because of courseee they have to include that part. they can’t just give him the compliment he deserves. there has to be a caveat which is annoying. i wasn’t omitting it for a nefarious reason.
It’s very difficult to discern someone’s tone or intentions in written form, with so few words, especially from an anonymous source.
If you could kindly please provide more context clues in your next anon ask so that I can accurately assess your intentions, that would be most helpful to me, and to anyone who reads our correspondence.
In any case, I stand my reply, as I think the overarching sentiment of that DeuxMoi anon is that Armie Hammer is a good man who cares for others despite not being the paragon of perfection that many of his detractors expect him to be. It’s a good reminder that we are all flawed human beings just doing the best we can with what we know.
And when we know better, we do better.
Thanks for your clarification. 🕵️♀️🦴💖💪✨
