#indiewire

IW: What is your world like right now? Is Hollywood still trying to bring you in? Are you pushing them out?

M: I mean it’s a mixture, right? I’ve had a lot of conversations with a lot of studios that have been both fruitful, and not fruitful. Some people, they understand what’s happening, or they don’t understand, or they think they understand. Honestly, it’s been good to have those conversations because it means that more people are curious about what creators can offer. I like to be in that place because I want to help other creators to make their projects. I’m already getting that underway with a couple friends of mine. I’m able to kind of play matchmaker — like, I’ve talked to these studios, I think this might be a good fit for you to try to direct your first thing. And that’s been huge, huge to be able to do that. It feels great to kind of be in a position where I can affect change.

IW: You say some understand, some don’t. Where’s the most common place of not understanding?

M: Probably what people would expect — the larger the company, usually the harder it is for them to get it. But at the same time, sometimes those companies have individuals who really, really understand and are advocating. And who knows? They might have been advocating for a very long time. I get the impossible job of movie marketing. You have to make people fall in love with a thing they’ve never heard of before. It’s really difficult.

IW: Obviously, they want the audience. That drove your success and that’s what got Hollywood excited. Do they understand that as a creator, you have to serve the audience? That it’s not something you can just pick up and go?

M: I don’t know if there is a perfect understanding of it. There’s more doors opening up to these audiences and I know there’s going to be some predatory companies. The majority of conversations I’ve had with people have been really nice. It makes me realize in the Hollywood engine, there’s still a lot of good people that really want to make art and that gives me hope.

IW: Does that surprise you?

M: Yeah. Admitting this in person is weird, but it’s true. Even in some of the big, seemingly soulless companies, there’s a lot of really passionate people who want to make art. People get into this industry because they really love the expression of the art and the outpouring of talent that goes into every part of it. They’ve found their niche somewhere on the business side, as opposed to the actual creative side, but all of them love — well, not all of them. A lot of them. A lot of them still love making movies.

IW: For your next film, are you still looking at the “Iron Lung” method in terms of controlling all the things? Or are you willing to let some of those things be controlled by others?

M: I am willing to let things be controlled because honestly, looking back, I did too much myself. But at the same time, I want to make my own post house. I like editing anyway and I want to shape it in a way that I can leverage technology. I still think there are some ideas that are bigger than what I could tackle myself. Again, it’s that optimism of talking to these companies and being like, oh, there are people that are passionate and really do believe in the process. I want to meet more of those people so I can work with them.

IW: How are things going with YouTube? Have you been happy with the way that’s worked out?

M: I’ve been very happy. It took a while to get off the ground, but that’s because some of the systems are still old. I still have that itch of like, “Ooh, I think we could optimize it.” But at the same time, I can’t lose sight that I now can help other people get their movies and shows on the platform. I can be in that position again to play matchmaker.

IW: Creators can support other creators. It can become this loop for more and more people to make projects. Not saying it’s going to destroy the other streamers or it’s going to destroy theaters, but it’s another avenue for creators as an individual to put their project forward.

M: In terms of the changes that need to happen, how much do you think that has to do with not the films, but with the deal-making?

IW: You’ve got to do what’s best for you, but if you’re true to the [audience], they’ll be true to you and they will be there for you when you need them. It’s this currency of loyalty that is so hard to quantify. It’s almost impossible to put a number of value to it because it’s an interpersonal human relationship. Even through the internet, that exchange is there and you can’t tax it too much. Creators all kind of intuitively know that.

M: You have to pay it back, you have to understand and respect the cycle. You can’t just be so greedy and want money that you need to claw everything out of it. You have to understand that it’s all feeding itself and the next creators need to be inspired to make things. More opportunities to do so, better opportunities for people to see it, more money to be made, more movies to be made, yada, yada.

IW: What are you thinking in terms of what you want to do next? Have you chosen a project?

Originally I was going to upload the video interview with Reshma that is featured in the link below. But someone was quite moody that Friday morning, so I have decided not to.

For the purpose of this post, we’ll just focus on this snippet:

For both Balfe and Heughan, the love that is at the center of their show is also what they will remember most behind the scenes…

Heughan quickly agreed: “Caitríona’s right, it’s the cast, it’s the love. And Caitríona herself, you know sharing all these amazing moments with her is so special. I’m really lucky.”

GIFs credit to @caitrionabafle

Minotaur (2026) 安德烈·萨金塞夫（Andrey Zvyagintsev）在2021年因新冠并发症濒临死亡，又从死亡边缘归来——但不同于另一位同样历劫重生却只带回了糟糕作品的戛纳导演，这位俄罗斯作者的强势回归之作《牛头怪》（Minotaur）不仅是一次状态的复位，更是一部只有《利维坦》（Leviathan，2014）和《无爱可诉》（Loveless，2017）的导演才能拍出的电影：绝望、冷峻，带着毫不留情的政治指控。 影片改编自克劳德·夏布罗尔（Claude Chabrol）1969年的情色惊悚片《不忠的妻子》（La femme infidèle）——那部作品后来又经阿德里安·莱恩（Adrian…

Domhnall Gleeson at the Sundance 2026 IndieWire Studio💙