One of the funniest and yummiest fights recently witnessed on Indian television or YouTube. Iâm talking about the tug-of-war between two giants Cadbury, India and NestlĂŠ, India. Earlier Cadbury had released a quirky ad for its wafer-chocolate Perk. In an entertaining retro-filmy way (aka Bollywood style) they pretty much attacked their unnamed but quite obvious arch rival. Ogilvy Mumbaiâs ad wonderfully highlighted the new perks that Perk chocolate has to offer; i.e. it was heavier with extra layer of wafer et al via a character named Monu. Eventually the advert ends by announcing its newly launched twin-bar Cadbury Perk Glucose with its âextra wafer, extra chocolate, extra pyaarâ.
However, this was quite hard to digest by the competition. In fact, to everyoneâs surprise and my delight, within a short span of time NestlĂŠ came back with a hard-hitting punch, #MunchKaPunch that is. It was a spoof on the earlier released Perk ad, which was widely promoted as well as appreciated via Social Media (mainly due to its quirky & unique approach to advertising chocolate). This was quite a risk as the retort could have fallen flat. However, content is the king here. Content matters and how it is executed is the key. JWT, Delhi decided to take up âSonuâ in order to address the âreal-dealâ with chocolates. What mattered most? The full and final verdict was its taste! Frankly speaking, when it comes to chocolate the least of my concerns is about the grams/weight of the treat. Rather enjoy the damn good taste. The creative team seemed to hit the nail and picked up on its targetsâ desires really well with pretty heavy dosage of cheeky humour. In my opinion this retort by NestlĂŠ is a sure hit.
Not to say that Perk wasnât good. It was a well-done ad that caught the attention and highlighted the facts about its product in an entertaining manner too. But what earned additional pats on the back was the reply by the competition, Munch. It took its somewhat negative take on the situation and turned its âsupposedâ weakness into its strength. Â âCrunchiest ever. Tastiest ever. NestlĂŠ Munch, the choice is clear.â Brownie points for the portrayal of âSonuâ â he was the icing (oops) chocolate coating on the wafer. His comic timing, dialogue delivery and (no offense) but his overall look was just hilarious.
To sum it up, the point to be made is that both the ads were successful in their own respective manners and timings. Being an epic foodie with a sweet tooth, Iâll go for both the brands. The thing to celebrate here is the fantastic union of the creative teams, the overall content and clear executions. Facts and points were stated clearly but it didnât bore the viewer/consumer. Goes to show ads donât have to be bland or blah in order to get its message across. The consumer doesnât need to be bored or feel like theyâve wasted their time. These ads (TVC) entertain. We were laughing and enjoying. We didnât feel like the brands were taking away or asking for anything from us, in fact they were fighting for our love (also, our money haha) but in return we got entertained. In fact, it ends up grabbing more attention and spreads the word without trying too hard.
It was like watching a good olâ Hrishikesh Mukherjee comedy film for me (*grabs popcorn* hoping for another round, aaaanndd action)!