#hooked cross

All of you yap about propaganda and how Christianity changes the narrative, but you won't even call the evil shit by its real name when you can vilify a major Hindu/Buddhist/Jain symbol instead.

Historian Dr. Rex Curry was the one to prove that the flag pledge written by the SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy for socialist (government) schools in the USA was the origin of the notorious stiff-armed salute (& related behavior) adopted later by Hitler's socialists. Dr. Curry also proved that Hitler's flag symbol was used to represent "S for Socialism" (the name of Hitler's party).

Many google search results are BS. The following phrases reveal the deceit of Google searches, which often claim “no results found” for many of these phrases despite the fact the “salute” phrases have been used for decades in many books and more in regard to Dr. Rex Curry’s discoveries.

Where did the Nazi salute come from? "Bellamy salute produced the Nazi salute"; “Nazi salutes came from military salutes”; “History of Hitler salute”; “Origin of the Hitler salute”; “Where did Hitler salute”; “How the Nazi salute”; “Hitler salutes came from”; “So, where does the fascist 'Sieg Heil' salute come from”; “History of Nazi salute”; “Social history of Nazi salute”; “Weird history of Nazi salute”; “Origin of the Nazi salute”; “Where did Nazi salutes”; “How the Nazi salute”.

"Bellamy salute produced the Hitler salute"; "The military salute produced the Hitler salute"; “military salute led to Hitler’s salute”; “military salute led to the Nazi salute”; “military salute led to Nazi salute”; “Nazi salute came from military salute”; “Bellamy salute was origin of Nazi salute”; "military salute was origin of nazi salute"; "military salute was the origin of Hitler's salute"; “What is the origin of what we call the Nazi salute”;

“History of Fascist salute”; “Origin of the Fascist salute”; “Where did Fascist salutes”; “How the Fascist salute”; “Saluto Fascista”; “Fascist salutes came from”; "Bellamy salute produced the Fascist salute"; “Origin of the Fascism salute”; “History of Fascism salute”; “Where did Fascism salutes”; “How did Fascism salute” “Fascism salutes came from”; "Bellamy salutes produced the Fascist salute"; "military salutes produced the Fascist salute"; “History of Roman salute”; “Saluto Romano”; “Origin of the Roman salute”; “Where did Roman salute”; “Roman salute came from”; "Bellamy salute produced the Roman salute"; "military salutes produced the Roman salute".

Stupid World is where we live. That is why TV, radio, and print media WILL NOT ever explain Dr. Curry’s discovery that the USA’s socialist flag pledge spread the stiff-armed salute that was used under the German flag bearing Hitler’s socialist symbol.

The Long History Of The Nazi Salute And The USA: “Nazi salutes came from pledge”; “Nazi salute came from pledge”; “Nazi salute came from USA”; “Nazi salutes came from America”; "Nazi salutes came from USA"; “Nazi salute came from America”; "USA was origin of Nazi salutes"; "Nazi salutes originated in the USA"; “Nazi salutes came from the Pledge”; “USA started Nazi salutes”; “America started Nazi salutes”; “Americans did Nazi salutes”; "Nazism came from America"; "Nazism came from USA"; “socialists created Nazi salutes”; “a socialist created Nazi salutes”; “Nazi salutes came from socialism”; “Nazi salutes came from socialists”; “Nazi salutes came from American socialists”; “America created Nazi salutes”; “Americans popularized Nazi salutes”; “the USA created Nazi salutes”; “American Nazi Salutes”; “America’s Nazi Salute”; “Nazi Salute USA”.

The searches above show the intellectual stagnation of the world in the 21st century. It is more proof that government schools (socialist schools) must end. It proves you are living in Stupid World and in our modern socialist idiocracy. It illustrates the intellectual dishonesty of academia and so-called “historians.” It shows the dedication of “Liars For Socialism” who hide how Hitler self-identified. Socialism is stupid lies by stupid liars.

Web searches for anything like “Nazi Germany never existed” or “the Nazi Party didn’t exist” or “The Third Reich didn’t exist” usually lead to hypothetical questions about how much better the world would have been if “Nazi Germany had never existed.” No one on the internet is smart enough to consider the semantic fact that “Nazi Germany never existed” nor any related revelation. Only Dr. Rex Curry could blaze those web trails (in November 2021 according to searches).

Do web searches for "Hitler never said Third Reich" or "Hitler didn't say Third Reich" or "Hitler didn't use the term Third Reich" or “Hitler banned Third Reich” or “Hitler outlawed Third Reich” or “Hitler forbid Third Reich” or “Third Reich didn’t exist”. The results will indicate that Professor Rex Curry is the only person who has noticed and remarked about how Hitler never said, "Third Reich" and did not refer to his nation as the "Third Reich." (search performed 4-11-2023). Is that not the damnedest thing? This is decades after WW2, so how is that possible? In fact, Hitler banned “Third Reich.” How can all other historians and scholars and academia be so stupid?

Also try: “Hitler’s Germany did not self-identify as the Third Reich”; “Hitler did not self-identify as the Third Reich”; “Third Reich never existed”; "Hitler never called Germany the Third Reich"; "Hitler never called his nation the Third Reich". Hitler never said swastika.

The website Goodreads has a “Political Philosophy and Ethics” discussion board with a “mod” (“moderator”) named Alan Johnson (alanejohnson) who was so stupid that he had to delete posts about Dr. Curry’s discovery regarding Hitler’s non-use of “Third Reich.” On September 13, 2015, Johnson wrote idiotically that “Debates, for example, about whether Adolph [sic] Hitler ever used the terms ‘Third Reich’ or ‘Nazi’ or ‘fascist’ -as distinguished from the actual principles and operation of his regime- are more appropriately addressed in groups that are focused on such minute historical issues rather than on political philosophy as such. Posters who persist in raising issues that are outside the scope of the subject matter of this group will also be removed from the group.” Johnson removed from the group a poster who explained Dr. Curry’s discoveries about Hitler’s political philosophy. Johnson had to PREVENT people from discussing the facts. Johnson confirmed that Dr. Curry’s discoveries were correct.

“Socialists self-identify the same as Hitler”; “Socialists identify the same way Hitler did”; “Every socialist self-identifies the same as Hitler”; “Socialists share the same political philosophy as Hitler”; “Socialists share the same philosophy as Hitler”; "AOC self-identifies the same as Hitler"; “Bernie Sanders self-identifies the same as Hitler”; “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez self-identifies the same as Hitler”.

“Covering up socialism”; “cover up for socialism”; “cover up socialism”; “coverup for socialism”; “Never say socialist”; “Never say socialism”. “cover up for Hitler and his socialism”.

“Do not say Nazi”; “Not say Nazi movement”; “Never say Nazi”; “Sozi-Nazi”.

“Stop the N-word”; “Abolish the N-word”; “Fight the N-word”.

Dr. Rex Curry changed the way the world sees swastikas. Dr. Curry exposed swastikas. Dr. Curry changed the swastika.

You don’t even need quotation marks for these searches: Socialist Swastika; Swastika socialism. Or try these: “Hitler’s socialist swastika”; “Lenins swastika”; “communist swastika”; “communism’s swastika”; “Marx swastika”; “Marxist swastika”; “Soviet swastika”; “Soviet cross”; “Soviet crucifix”; “S shapes for socialism”; “shapes for socialism”; “S letters for socialism”; “S means socialist”; “S means socialism”; “S is socialism”; “S is socialist”; “S for socialist”; “S for socialism”; “S means socialism”; “S means socialist”; “S equals socialism”; “S equals socialist”; “S is for socialism”; “S is for socialist”.

On 9-12-2022 Google search claimed that there were no results for “socialist symbol of hate”. Ditto for "socialism's symbol of hate" and "socialism's symbols of hate". Try “socialist symbols of hate”; “socialist swastika”;

SOCIALISM was Hitler's flag & his salute came from a USA socialist.

On 4-2-2024, the dominant search engine indicated that there were no results for “Hitler’s socialist symbols” (so Dr. Curry’s work might soon be the first to provide results). There was a single result for “Hitler’s socialist symbolism” which linked to work citing Dr. Curry’s scholarship. No results for “Hitler’s Socialist Trademarks”; “Hitler’s Socialist Icons”; “Hitler’s Socialist Hallmarks”; Try “Nazi Socialist Symbols”; “Nazi Socialist Symbolism”. The terms “German socialist symbols” and “German socialist symbolism” did provide results.

“Socialism’s Swastika” (with or without quotation marks, this search is disturbing in that it sometimes appears that Google will deliberately not provide any results consistent with the search but will substitute incorrect results instead). And Wikipedia liars delete all mention of swastikas as alphabetical symbolism.

Search for “swastika alphabetical”; “Schutzstaffel swastika”; “double S Schutzstaffel”; “Sturmabteilung Swastika”; “Volkswagen VW Swastika”; “Swastika Volkswagen”; “swastikologist”; “swastikalogist”; “swastikology”; “swastikalogy”; “Dr. Swastika”; “Doctor Swastika”; “lighthouse of libertarian thought”.

“Swastika and Nazi”; “Nazi and Swastika”; “Swastika Nazi”; “Nazi Swastika” (both words are used to cover up for socialism).

"Tampa Bay Times Newspaper swastika"; "Tampa Bay Times swastika building"; "Tampa Bay swastika"; “Tampa Swastika”; "Saint Petersburg Times Newspaper swastika"; "Saint Petersburg Times swastika"; "Saint Petersburg swastika"; "St. Petersburg Times Newspaper swastika"; "St. Petersburg Times swastika"; "St. Petersburg swastika"; “Saint Pete Swastika”; “St. Pete Swastika”; “Florida Swastika”.

For more dishonest search results try: “Hitler was socialist” or “Hitler was a socialist”. Try it with a misspelling: “Adolph Hitler was socialist” (although some sources assert that Hitler was christened “Adolphus”). “Hitle was commies”; “Hitler was a commie”; “Hitler was Pinko”; “Hitler was a Pinko”.

Stalin helped Hitler. Stalin helped Mao.

Fascinating web searches: compare “Hitler was not socialist” and “Hitler was socialist”; “Nazis were not socialists” and “Nazis were socialists”; “Hitler called himself a socialist”; “Socialists are Nazis”; “Socialists are not Nazis”; “Hitler called himself socialist”; “Hitler was a self-described socialist” (Wokies ALWAYS call me a Nazi for knowing this). “Hitler was a self-proclaimed socialist”; “Hitler described himself as a socialist”; "they self-identify the same as Hitler"; “Hitler’s Socialist Revolution”; “Hitler advocated socialism”; “Hitler touted socialism”; “Hitler promoted socialism”; “Socialists don't want you to know that they self-identify the same as Hitler"; And that’s why we drink.

“Hitler and Stalin self-identified as socialist”; “Stalin and Hitler self-identified as socialist”; “Hitler and Stalin called themselves socialist”; “Stalin and Hitler called themselves socialist”; “Nazis self-identified as socialists”; “Nazis called themselves socialists”; “Fascists self-identified as socialists”; “Fascists called themselves socialists”; “self identify as socialist”; “Hitler the Socialist”.

If Hitler had self-identified as “Nazi” or “Fascist”, would you want to self-identify that way? Did the Nazis ever refer to themselves as "fascists"?

Joseph Goebbels never self-identified as Nazi-Sozi. “Nazi-Sozi never appears within the interior text”; “Nazi-Sozi doesn’t appear”; “Nazi-Sozi does not”; “Nazi-Sozi doesn’t exist”; “Nazi-Sozi isn’t”; “Nazi-Sozi is not”; “Goebbels never said Nazi-Sozi”; “never wrote Nazi-Sozi”; Other fun web searches are “Sozi-Nazi” and “Hakenkenkreuzlers” and "Young Peoples Group of the Hakenkreuzlers."

“Jewish Soviet Star”; “Jewish Communist Star”; “Jewish Socialist Star” (a web search in October 2023 indicated no results for “Jewish Socialist Star” suggesting that Dr. Curry’s research will provide the first web result for that phrase).

"Hitler was not fascist"; "Hitler did not call himself fascist"; "Hitler identified as socialist"; “Fascists are Socialists”; “Fascism is Socialism”; “Socialists are Fascists”; “Socialism is Fascism”; "Hitler described himself as socialist";

Web searches show many articles that claim: “Hitler was not socialist” or “Nazis were not socialists”; “Hitler wasn’t socialist”; “Nazis weren’t socialists”. Those articles are all authored by people who self-identify the same as Adolf Hitler (and they are very uncomfortable about it). Their posts always concede that: “their name did include the word socialist” or “it included the word socialist” or “it has the word socialist in it.” Their concession is designed as a lie to imply that there is NO OTHER EVIDENCE that Hitler and “Nazis” were socialists. For 25 years Hitler touted “socialism” and “socialists” by the very word over and over and over again.

Every author of “Nazis weren’t socialists” articles displays these GLARING omissions: (1) Hitler’s group did not self-identify as “Nazis” (most authors are ignoramuses in that regard. A tiny few just can’t bear to state the truth and they don’t want anyone else to learn it); and (2) Hitler and “Nazis” self-identified as “socialists” by the very word in massive speeches and writings. None of them disputes Dr. Curry’s academic work regarding (1) and (2) above.

All of the writers want readers to believe (falsely) that Hitler and his supporters referred to each other as “Nazis” exclusively or often and displayed that weasel N-word on pins, badges, banners, and flags. None of them mention that Soviet socialists joined German socialists to start WWII and onward. It’s amusing mental acrobatics.

It is the falsification of history. For example, see Ronald J. Granieri (in the Washington Post). Granieri concedes reluctantly that socialism was a very important part of the NSGWP appeal (right near the top of all elements in their appeal). Granieri makes this astounding declaration: “Did you know that ‘Nazi’ is short for ‘National Socialist’? That means that Hitler and his henchmen were all socialists. Bernie Sanders calls himself a socialist, too. That means Bernie Sanders and his supporters are the same as Nazis … doesn’t it?” Of course, it also means that Granieri is a common ignoramus who asks “Did you know that ‘Nazi’ is short for ‘National Socialist’” without knowing that “Nazi” isn’t how Hitler’s ilk self-identified. They self-identified the same as Bernie Sanders.

Also see the hilarious example by Thomas Vorreyer, another common ignoramus. Vorreyer falsely believes that “In 1934, American writer Theodore Abel created a fake competition to trick hundreds of people into describing why they loved the Nazi Party so much.” Vorreyer didn’t know that NO ONE described why they loved the “Nazi Party” so much. And Abel did not “trick” anyone into doing that when he specified the rules for his contest. The title of the Vice article is “Nazis Explain Why They Became Nazis” even though none of them self-identified as “Nazis” nor explained why they became “Nazis.” In his article, Vorreyer has no inkling of what Abel’s written evidence said. Vorreyer cannot provide lengthy quotes as such excerpts would expose Vorreyer’s stupidity (or his deliberate dishonesty?). Vorreyer knows that if he re-wrote the article with quotes of the same Germans explaining why they supported “socialism” by the very word, then Vice would not print it. Vice will only print lies about this topic. The article had to be lies for Vice to publish it. Vice will not provide a retraction or correction in this regard. Vorreyer will never take any corrective action and he will never ask Vice to take any corrective action.

Other writers are not as dishonest as the Vorreyer/Vice article, and the results are hilarious. Some lectures on YouTube begin with an academic referring to Hitler as a “Nazi” and/or “Fascist” and then the academic witlessly reads a Hitler quote in which the German Chancellor self-identified as a “socialist” (within the quote). The contradiction goes right over the lecturer’s head. The first time that the word “socialist” pops up in such dissertations is from Hitler’s mouth, when the lecturer repeats Hitler’s words. The ONLY times that “socialism” appears in such lectures is from Hitler’s own words describing his own dogma. The lecturer keeps saying “Nazi” and “Fascist” and Hitler keeps saying “Socialist.” It is embarrassing comedy gold.

Other lecturers match the intellectual dishonesty of the Vorreyer/Vice article: They will never display a quote of Hitler in which he self-identifies as a “socialist.” They will never quote "Triumph of the Will" wherein Hitler is lauded as the "epitome of altruism" and his fellow socialists refer to each other as "comrades" who will cause a "revolution of the people and workers" to end "class struggle" and create "egalitarianism." Today’s lecturers are frustrated because there are no quotes of Hitler in which he self-identifies as a “Nazi” or “Fascist.” Deceitful lecturers just keep repeating “Nazi” and “Fascist” over and over. Sophisticated listeners roll their eyes.

A web search (on G) claimed that there were no results for the query “International Socialist German Workers Party” (on 9-10-2022). There were three useless results for “International Socialist German”.

More fascinating web searches: “Hitler called himself a socialist”; “Socialists are Nazis”; “Socialists are not Nazis”; “Socialists are Fascists”; “Socialism is Fascism”; “Fascists are Socialists”; “Fascism is Socialism”; “Hitler called himself socialist”; “Was Hitler socialist?”; “Were Nazis socialist?” (Why not ask them?).

“If Hitler called himself Nazi or Fascist would you want to call yourself Nazi or Fascist?”; “If Hitler self-identified as Nazi or Fascist would you want to self-identify as Nazi" or Fascist?”; “If Hitler self-identified as Fascist”; "If Hitler had self-identified as Nazi"; "If Hitler had self-identified as Fascist"; “If Hitler had called himself”; “If Hitler had called his group”; A search of the web indicated NO results (“no results” was an absurdly inaccurate result) for the following items: "Hitler called himself Fascist"; "Hitler called himself Nazi"; and NO results of course for "If Hitler called himself Fascist" or "If Hitler called himself Nazi"; "If Hitler said he was nazi"; "If Hitler said he was fascist" (the preceding searches were performed on 1/9/2024 using the dominant search engine). A search for "If Hitler self-identified as Nazi" revealed only results concerning Dr. Rex Curry's discoveries.

These are secret topics on the interwebs: “Hitler’s Language”; “Hitler’s Diction”; “Hitler’s Phraseology”; “Hitler’s Speech”; “Hitler’s Wording”; “Hitler’s Dictionary”; “Hitler’s Thesaurus”; “Hitler’s Lexicon”; “Hitler’s Vocabulary”; “Hitler’s Dialect”; “Hitler’s Etymology”; “Hitler’s glossary”; “Hitler’s linguistic habits”; “Hitler’s rhetoric”; “Hitler’s terminology”; “Hitler’s jargon”. Then substitute the word “Nazi” for “Hitler.” As in: “Nazi Dictionary”; “Nazi Thesaurus”; “Nazi Lexicon”; “Nazi language”; “Nazi Vocabulary”; “Nazi Dialect”; “Nazi Etymology”; “Nazi glossary”; “Nazi linguistic habits”; “Nazi rhetoric”; “Nazi terminology”; “Nazi jargon”. Then substitute the word “Fascist” for “Hitler.” Such as: “Fascist Dictionary”; “Fascist Thesaurus”; “Fascist Lexicon”; “Fascist Vocabulary”; “Fascist Dialect”; “Fascist Etymology”; “Fascist glossary”; “Fascist linguistic habits”; “Fascist rhetoric”; “Fascist terminology”; “Fascist jargon”.

A “Glossary of Nazi Germany” was maintained by Wikipedia Liars at the time this was written. I am not making this up. Wikipedia’s glossary didn’t mention that “Nazi Germany” was not a term used by Hitler. The glossary has a lot of unintended laughs in it that the Wikipedia Liars were too ignorant to comprehend. The article stated: “Some words were coined by Adolf Hitler and other Nazi Party members.” Seriously, it says that. Wikipedia never explains that there was no “Nazi Party,” and Hitler and the “members” didn’t use that term. Wikipedia is trying to erase the actual name of the party. They don’t want you to know.

Google claimed (on 10-24-2021) that there were “no results found” in a search (with quotation marks) for "Hitler never self-identified as a Nazi"; "Hitler never said the word Nazi"; “Hitler never said Nazi”; “Hitler did not say Nazi”; and “Nazi isn’t in Mein Kampf”. On 10-24-2021, Google claimed that in a search (with quotation marks) for "Hitler did not self-identify as a Nazi" there were only four results and they were all references to the work of the libertarian pedagogue Dr. Rex Curry (there were similar results for “Hitler did not call himself a Nazi"). “Hitler never said he was a Nazi”; “Hitler never said he was a Fascist”; “Hitler didn’t call himself a Fascist”; “Hitler didn’t call himself a Nazi”. A similar lack of results occurred for "Hitler did not identify as a Nazi"; "Hitler never identified as a Nazi"; “Hitler did not call himself a Fascist” (in August 2023 an internet web search indicated that there were only three results for this inquiry and they all pointed to the work of Dr. Rex Curry. AMAZING! MSM is so intellectually dishonest).

Socialists refuse to answer this question: When did you learn that Hitler self-identified as a socialist? They live the lie that they never heard it. Socialists have nothing but lies. More searches: When did you first learn that Hitler self-identified as a socialist? A search on 7-1-2024 (for “first learn that Hitler”) revealed only three results and only one of those results was related to the subject matter here (and pointed to Dr. Curry’s work). When did you learn that Hitler called his group socialist? When did you first learn Hitler called himself socialist? A search on 7-1-2024 (for “first learn Hitler”) revealed no results.

How did you learn that Hitler self-identified as a socialist? How did you first learn Hitler described himself as a socialist? How did you learn that Hitler called his group socialist? How did you learn that Hitler called himself socialist? There is a good chance that anyone who answers those questions will say, “from Educational Outreach Programs about Dr. Rex Curry’s work!”

How did you learn that Hitler didn’t self-identify as a Nazi or Fascist? How did you first learn that Hitler didn’t self-identify as Nazi nor Fascist? How did you learn that Hitler didn’t call his group Nazi or Fascist? How did you learn that Hitler did not call himself Nazi nor Fascist?

It is astonishing that there are almost no web search results for inquiries like: “Hitler did not call himself a Fascist” and "Hitler did not self-identify as a Nazi". We expect that MSM would produce no results because they are brainwashed, stupid, and "Liars For Socialism." But why are there no results for any so-called conservatives, republicans, and libertarians? Why have radio talk show hosts not made such statements and produced web hits? Why has no one on Fox News said such things and produced web hits? Shouldn't they say such things often? What is going on?

That is some great brainwashing of Fox News, radio talk show hosts, and so-called conservatives, republicans, and libertarians. In fact, when you tell them about this topic, they seem to become angry. This helps explain why we are so screwed. The people who should be saying these things become annoyed when these things are said by someone else.

Google reported (on 9-14-2023) that there were four results in a search for “Francisco Franco didn’t self-identify as Fascist” (with quotation marks) and all of the results pointed to the work of the libertarian lecturer Rex Curry. Also see "Franco never self-identified as a Fascist"; "Franco did not self-identify as a Fascist"; “Franco did not call himself a Fascist"; “Franco never said he was a Fascist”; “Franco didn’t call himself a Fascist”. A similar lack of results occurred for "Franco did not identify as a Fascist"; "Franco never identified as a Fascist"; “Franco did not call himself a Fascist”. So-called “scholars” will go on and on about the Spanish Civil War between the “Fascists” and the “Communists” but they will never mention that, shortly after the war ended, Soviet socialism joined German socialism to launch WWII in a conspiracy for world socialism.

“There was no Nazi Party"; “Adolf Hitler's party was not the Nazi Party"; “Nazi Party did not exist”; “Nazi Party didn’t exist”; “Nazi Party never existed”; “Nazi Party is slang”; "Nazis did not call themselves Nazis"; “Nazis didn’t call themselves Nazis”.

Next, substitute the word “Fascist” for “Nazi” in the searches. "Hitler never self-identified as Fascist"; "Hitler did not self-identify as Fascist"; “Hitler did not call himself a Fascist"; "Hitler did not identify as a Fascist"; "Hitler never identified as a Fascist". “Nazi Fascist”; “Fascist Nazi”; “Nazi Fascists”; “Fascist Nazis”.

Then, for laughs, try these: “Hitler never said he was a socialist”; “Hitler didn’t call himself a socialist”; “Hitler did not call himself a socialist”; "Hitler never self-identified as Socialist"; "Hitler did not self-identify as Socialist"; "Hitler did not identify as a Socialist"; "Hitler never identified as a Socialist"; “Hitler wasn’t a Nazi”; “Hitler wasn’t a Fascist”; “Hitler was not a Nazi”; “Hitler was not a Fascist”. The top stupid web search engine will insert “helpful” additions to click on for more info such as “What are the features of Nazism?”

"There was no Nazi Germany"; “Nazi Germany did not exist”; “Nazi Germany didn’t exist”; “Nazi Germany never existed”; “Nazi Germany is slang”;

The web lacks these truths: “A socialist created communism” and “A socialist created fascism” (that observation was first made by the World’s Historian Laureate Dr. Rex Curry according to web searches for the quoted remarks); “A socialist started fascism”; “A socialist started communism”; “A socialist invented fascism”; “A socialist invented communism”; “fascism was started by a socialist”; “communism was started by a socialist”; “fascism was created by a socialist”; “communism was created by a socialist”; "Communism and Fascism were created by socialists"; "Fascism and Communism were created by socialists"; "Socialists created Communism and Fascism"; “Fascism came from socialism”; “Communism came from socialism”; “Fascism and Communism came from socialists”; “Fascism and Communism came from socialism”; “Communism and fascism came from socialists”; “Communism and fascism came from socialism”.

“Socialists ruin everything”; “Socialism ruins everything”; “Marx ruins everything”; “Marxists ruin everything”; “Marxism ruins everything”; “Communists ruin everything”; “Communism ruins everything”;

“No results” were found in web searches (when they were originally searched) for the following two phrases searched separately: “Communism came from a socialist” and “Fascism came from a socialist”. It is astonishing to report that the original searches were performed in late 2021. The esotericist Dr. Rex Curry is credited as the first historiographer to place the phrases on the web (e.g. by informing the author of this book). Dr. Rex Curry broke the internet.

How long did the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact last? “Molotov-Ribbentrop lasted”; “Molotov-Ribbentrop continued for”;

Wholecaust; 535-07-5248; “Socialist Holocaust”; “Stalin Mao Hitler”; “surveillance socialism”; “Socialists killing socialists is trademark socialism”; “Socialists kill socialists”; “Purging socialists is bona fide socialism”; “Killing socialists is the primary sign of socialism”; “communists kill communists”; “communists killing communists is trademark communism”; “socialism is theft”; “socialists are thieves”; “socialism is violence”; “socialism is hate”; “socialism is a hate crime”.

“Socialists abuse plural pronouns”; “Socialists overuse plural pronouns”; “Socialists misuse plural pronouns”.

On 9-13-2022 Google claimed in a web search that there were no results for "Kennedy was killed by a socialist" (that means that this book might be the first to appear in such a search in the future); Google claimed that there were five results for "Kennedy was killed by a Marxist"; Google claimed that there were 38,000 results for "Kennedy was killed by a communist" and yet the number of pages displayed at the bottom numbered only four pages, and when page 2 was clicked, the other four pages disappeared and only one page existed (and the “results” count had suddenly changed to ten results), which meant that Google only displayed ten results for the search "Kennedy was killed by a communist". Do all of these web searches indicate that Google is a big part of “Liars for Socialism”?

John F. Kennedy. A Socialist Killed Kennedy; Socialism killed Kennedy; Kennedy was killed by socialism; A Marxist Killed Kennedy; A Communist Killed Kennedy. A Socialist assassinated Kennedy; A Marxist assassinated Kennedy; A Communist assassinated Kennedy; A socialist murdered Kennedy; A Marxist murdered Kennedy; A Communist murdered Kennedy. Kennedy was killed by a socialist; Kennedy was killed by a Marxist; Kennedy was killed by a communist.

More web searches: “Stalin, Mao, and Hitler”; “Stalin, Mao, Hitler”; “Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot”; “Stalin, Hitler, Mao”; “Mao, Stalin, Hitler”; “Mao, Hitler, Stalin”; “Hitler, Stalin, Mao”; “Hitler, Mao, Stalin”.

Google claimed (on 11-08-2021) that there were “no results found” in a search (with quotation marks) for "swastika isn’t in Mein Kampf" or “swastika is not in Mein Kampf”. The preceding search of 11-08-2021 was repeated on 5-17-2024 and the results were all references to Dr. Curry’s work. Also try “The word nazi is not in Mein Kampf nor in Triumph of the Will”; “fascism isn’t in Mein Kampf” (as a self-reference by Hitler). A web search revealed in May 2024 that the only results for these searches were references to Dr. Curry’s work: “Nazi is not in Mein Kampf” and “Fascist is not in Mein Kampf”.

More web searches: “Non-Gilded Age”; “Socialism’s Non-Gilded Age”.

In 2004, academic investigators supplemented Dr. Rex Curry’s archives with the following searches. At that time the analysis indicated that the website archiving Dr. Curry’s work was the first website to use the phrases below in the ongoing campaign to end the socialist salute to the flag and to end the socialist’s pledge of allegiance. The research revealed that NONE of the phrases appears on the web or in google news groups. Are the search results more evidence that libertarian traits of individualism and defiance of government are near zero, compared with socialist traits of regimentation and submission to government (e.g. collective saluting and pledging in government/socialized schools)?

The numbers to the right give the web results first, group results second. "Students should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0); "Children should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0); "Everyone should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0); "People should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0); "Americans should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0); "America should stop saluting" the flag (0, 0).

"Students should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Children should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Everyone should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "People should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Americans should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "America should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (0, 0).

"Students should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Children should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Everyone should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "People should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Americans should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "America should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0).

The 2004 analysis revealed a few results for some of the following phrases, though only one result involves advocating an end to the salute and pledge (yet it advocates an alternative salute and pledge). "We should stop saluting" the flag (1, 3); "We should stop pledging" allegiance to the flag (1, 3); "We should stop reciting" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (1, 1).

The following searches explored whether opposition to the salute and pledge ever mentioned its socialist origin and meaning. In the following searches (from 2004), a quoted part was included in the search with the word "socialist" or “socialism”. Wherever a “0” or small number appears it means that the site archiving Dr. Curry’s research was the first or one of the first to use the phrase on the web or groups. "Stop the salute" socialist (0, 0); "end the salute" socialist (0, 0) (not on topic); "end the pledge of allegiance" socialist (2, 0); "Stop the pledge" socialist (3, 2); "end the pledge" socialist (5, 11); "Don't pledge allegiance to the flag" socialism (1, 0); "Don't pledge allegiance" socialism (7, 1); "Don't salute the flag" socialism (0, 10); "Don't recite the pledge" socialism (2, 0); "Don't recite the pledge of allegiance" socialism (1, 0);

"Don't pledge allegiance to the flag" socialist (0, 0); "Don't pledge allegiance" socialist (10, 2); "Don't salute the flag" socialist (2, 0); "Don't recite the pledge" socialist (6, 2); "Don't recite the pledge of allegiance" socialist (1, 0).

The following phrases (and some of those above) provide search results that are astonishing in that they show how these phrases can be used in so many ways that DO NOT advocate ending the salute and pledge. Though each result (from 2004) was not checked, there were quick reviews that seem to indicate these phrases are used as parts of sentences that defend and support the salute and pledge. "End the flag salute" (0, 1); "end the salute to the flag" (0, 0); "stop the salute" (2, 0); "end the salute" (30, 0); "stop saluting the flag" (6, 9); "stop saying the pledge" (58, 18); "end the pledge of allegiance" (31, 11); "stop the pledge" (53, 82); "end the pledge" (156, 177); "Don't pledge allegiance to the flag" (27, 31); "Don't pledge allegiance" (222, 470); "Don't salute the flag" (114, 103); "Don't recite the pledge" (59, 59); "Don't recite the pledge of allegiance" (8, 14).

Regarding the phrases below (from 2004): Wherever a “0” or small number appears it means that the site that archives Dr. Curry’s research was the first or one of the first to use both concepts together on the web or in groups. In fact, in nearly every instance the archive site was the first to use the phrase to advocate ending the pledge and salute (because almost every prior instance of use was as a sentence fragment advocating the socialist pledge and salute). The following phrases (and some of those above) give search results that are astonishing in that they show how these phrases can be used in so many ways that DO NOT advocate ending the salute and pledge. "Students should not salute" the flag (1, 0); "Children should not salute" the flag (1, 0); "No one should salute" the flag (1, 0); "People should not salute" the flag (0, 0); "Americans should not salute" the flag (0, 0); "America should not salute" the flag (0, 0); "Students should not pledge" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "Children should not pledge " allegiance to the flag (1, 0); "No one should pledge" allegiance to the flag (10, 0); "People should not pledge" allegiance to the flag (1, 0); "Americans should not pledge" allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "America should not pledge" allegiance to the flag (1, 0); "Students should not recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (1, 1); "Children should not recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (4, 0); "No one should recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (19, 2); "People should not recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (2, 2); "Americans should not recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0); "America should not recite" the pledge of allegiance to the flag (0, 0).

“If I don’t do it, no one will do it; If I don’t talk about it, no one will; If I don’t write about it, no one will,” – the educator Dr. Rex Curry (commenting on why he exposed the Pledge of Allegiance, the Hakenkreuz symbol, and Hitler’s glossary).

These web searches should not include the parenthesis: ("pledge of allegiance" "Nazi salute") or ("pledge of allegiance" "Hitler salute") or (Bellamy "nazi salute") or (Bellamy "Hitler salute") or ("national socialist" Bellamy) or ("national socialism" bellamy).

“Stop the Pledge of Allegiance”; “Don’t do the Pledge of Allegiance”; “Don’t recite the Pledge of Allegiance”; and “Stop Kissing the Government’s Ass”.

Research archives in preparation of this book’s publication began long ago. In 2003, a web search for "socialist crimes against humanity" revealed only 45 results on the web, and 30 results on newsgroups. Most of the results were actually the phrase "national socialist crimes against humanity" (referencing Germany alone). Almost none of the results concerned the phrase "socialist crimes against humanity" without the word "national" preceding it (compare the search: "socialist crimes against humanity" -national). Dr. Rex Curry’s work resulted in one of the first websites to use the phrase "socialist crimes against humanity" without the word "national" preceding “socialist.” The world-renowned historian was the first to expose this bias in the media and the general population as evidenced in web searches. Try “Socialism’s crimes against humanity”.

“Crimes of Socialism”; “Socialist crimes”; “The Crimes of Communism”; “Communist crimes”.

“Socialism is murder”; “socialists are murderers”; “Socialism is suicide”; “socialism is genocide” (this search suggests that Google has become inaccurate as a search engine). “Socialism is self-destruction”; “socialist apocalypse”.

“Socialism is depression”; “Socialism causes depression”.

In 2003, a web search for "socialist holocaust" revealed only 28 hits on the web, 44 on newsgroups. Some of those results were preceded by the word "national" for the actual phrase "national socialist holocaust" -ignoring the much larger holocaust of Soviet socialism and Chinese socialism. That difference can be compared with a web search for (“socialist holocaust” -national) and do not include the parentheses. In comparison, a web search for "nazi holocaust" revealed over 27,000 hits on the web in 2003, and over 14,000 on newsgroups. Also compare the search “socialist genocide.”

“Female Holocaust”; “Female genocide”; “Female infanticide”; Gendercide; “Sex Holocaust”; “Sex genocide”; “blacks lynch whites more”; “blacks lynch blacks more”.

“Hitler was a Communist”; “Communist Hitler”; “Was Hitler a Marxist?” “Hitler was a Marxist”; “Hitler was Marxist”; “Marxist Hitler”; “Hitler’s Marxism”; “National Communism”; “Neo-communist”; “Neo-Nazi”; “National Marxism”; “Nazis were Communists”; “Marxists are Nazis and Nazis are Marxists”

“Socialism’s Holodomor”; “Holocausts and Holodomors”; “Holodomors and Holocausts”; “Holocaust and Holodomor”; “Holodomor and Holocaust”; then try adding the word “socialist” and/or “socialism” to the searches. Try “the socialist Holodomor Holocaust.” “Marxist Holocaust”; “Lenin’s Holocaust”; “Stalin’s Holocaust”; “Russia Holocaust”; “Communist Holocaust”; “Mao’s Holocaust”; “Kim’s Holocaust”; “North Korea Holocaust”; “Pol Pot’s Holocaust”; “Cambodian Holocaust”; “Ethnic Holocaust”.

“Socialism’s genocide”; “Marxist Genocide”; “Lenin’s Genocide”; “Stalin’s Genocide”; “Soviet Genocide”; “Russia Genocide”; “Communist Genocide”; “Mao’s Genocide”; “Kim’s Genocide”; “North Korea Genocide”; “Pol Pot’s Genocide”; “Cambodian Genocide”; “Ethnic Genocide”.

“Socialism’s famine”; “Marxist famine”; “Lenin’s famine”; “Stalin’s famine”; “Mao’s famine”; “Kim’s famine”; “North Korea famine”; “Pol Pot’s famine”; “Cambodian famine”; “Ethnic famine”; “Kazakh famine” (or “Goloshchekin genocide” under Filipp Goloshchekin).

More fun web searches and Rexisms: “Malthusian Socialism”; “Socialism lets people starve to death in the streets”; "Socialists let people starve to death in the street"; "Socialism let people starve to death in the street"; “Socialists literally let people starve to death in the streets,” (– Dr. Rex Curry).

In 2023 there appeared to be no examples of Stalin being referred to as “the Nazi Stalin” nor merely “Nazi Stalin” except as a reference to work by Dr. Curry. There were examples of the word Nazi next to the word Stalin, but not as an adjective or title.

It is hard to believe that in early 2022 a web search produced about four results for “Marx influenced Hitler” or “Marx inspired Hitler”. That shows remarkable intellectual dishonesty (socialist schools are very effective). Everyone else’s name comes up in the overflowing search results for “Hitler was influenced by”. Just not Marx. The search “Hitler was influenced by” appears to have its own special results format in Google (formatted to NOT mention Marx?).

“Marx hated Jews”; “Marx was antisemitic”; “Marx was a Nazi”; “Nazi Marx”; “Marx was a fascist”; “Fascist Marx”; “inwardly circumcised Jews”; “antisemitic socialism”; “antisemitic socialist”; “antisemitic communism”; “antisemitic communist”; “antisemitic Marxism”;

“Are you a Not-See?”; “All historians did not see”; “Every other historian did not see”; “All other historians did not see”; “All Historians cannot see”; “All Historians can not see”; “Do You Not See?”; “Can You Not See?”; “Will You Not See?”; “Should You Not See?”; “How Do You Not See?”; “R U A Not See?”; “Are You A Not See?”; “I’m Not A Not See”; “I’m A Not See”; Are you a Not-C?

“Never let a cop get behind you and if one does, turn”; “Never let a police officer get behind you”; “Don’t let a cop get behind you”.

The archives of the historian Dr. Rex Curry’s work go back at least to 2003, including his discoveries regarding swastika symbology, and gestures for the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. Yet in the time that has passed, Wikipedia Nazis and other social media sites and MSM liars have maintained their same falsehoods and omissions in order to cover up for Adolf Hitler and how he self-identified: socialist. They are very slow learners. And dedicated liars. Wikipedia’s benighted readers will always view the swastika as a four-armed question mark.

The following Wakipedia URL shows why “NEVER CITE WIKIPEDIA” and “DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA” are warnings at schools, colleges and news media. Web searches for the phrases provide many examples. Rather than a scholarly source, wikipedia is an anonymous bulletin board where anyone can delete or post anything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ANazi_Party%2FArchive_6?

“Crony socialism” (in quotes) in a web search provided the top result as a Wakipedia article on “crony capitalism” (that is disgusting suppression of the desired web search results). All the “related searches” suggested by Dikipedia had to do with “crony capitalism”. There is no page for “Crony Socialism” and a search on Wikipedia for “crony socialism” REDIRECTS to the page for “Crony Capitalism” (confirming Trikipedia’s “fake news” status). Here is the lead quote from Wikipedia Nazis: “The socialist position is that crony capitalism is the inevitable result of any strictly capitalist system and thus broadly democratic government must regulate economic, or wealthy, interests to restrict monopoly.” Notice how the word “democratic” is used as a synonym for “socialism” (Sikipedia uses “democratic” to cover up “socialism” and its corruption that makes the poor poorer). Here is a more accurate re-write of Wokipedia: “The capitalist position is that crony socialism is the inevitable result of any socialist system and thus free markets must exist to prevent socialist monopoly (healthcare, post office, guns, schools, food, clothing, shelter, or all goods and services).” Socialism creates monopolies.

There is no “crony capitalism.” Only socialism. The term "crony capitalism" is used by socialists to disparage capitalism and to imply that socialism is a preferable alternative. One might say "crony socialism" but that would be repetitive, according to Doctor Capitalism. It is intriguing that so few people have ever seen the term "crony socialism" or thought of it. The linguistic conditioning or brainwashing is strong.

The words “communism” and “fascism” are used by history teachers to cover up the crimes of socialism and socialists.

“Democracy” is used by socialists to cover-up for socialism.

Do a web search for “Dr. Capitalism” and “Doctor Capitalism”.

Based on all the socialist crapaganda that you have heard all your life, isn't the following amazing? Hitler never said "I hate socialists"; Hitler never said "I hate socialism"; Hitler never said, "I am a Nazi"; Hitler never said "I am a Fascist"; Hitler never referred to Germany as the "Third Reich".

Socialist liars want everyone to believe the BIG LIE: that Hitler and his supporters referred to themselves as "Nazis" and "the Nazi Party" and "Nazi Germany" through voluminous speeches and writings in which they glorified "Nazism." Socialists go through their entire lives without ever telling anyone anything different. Their goal is to preserve socialism’s biggest lie. Their mission is falsehood and ignorance.

Socialists are liars. Socialism is lies. Liars for socialism want instructors to teach students that Hitler and his ilk called themselves “Nazis” and “Fascists.” It might be the biggest socialist lie.

This is a poem of mine that I'm very proud of and got to perform on the finals stage at the Individual World Poetry Slam. I wrote it after performing at a rodeo and seeing a belt buckle of a Confederate flag lined with German Iron Crosses. I took a picture of it and got into a discussion about symbology and how once a culture/group takes on a symbol, they imbue it with their own values, meanings, and failings.

Hooked Cross by Jesse Parent