#guvnl

Wind power tariff redetermination for Tadas Wind Energy’s 50.4 MW Lalpur wind farm was heard by GERC in Petition No. 1365 of 2013. The daily order dated 21 May 2026 records that the petitioner sought tariff redetermination under Sections 61, 62 and 64 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The project has 63 wind turbines of 800 kW each. Wind power tariff issues in this case are linked to a PPA signed on 30 March 2012 and the generic tariff order dated 31 January 2010. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited is the respondent. EnergylineIndia.com highlights this case for readers tracking Power regulator disputes and older Wind power projects. Wind power tariff redetermination matters because even legacy PPAs can continue to raise commercial and legal questions. The outcome may be relevant for Wind power developer companies, discoms, investors and regulatory lawyers. Wind power tariff cases filed under tariff-determination provisions require careful review of original tariff assumptions, PPA terms and commission orders. The Lalpur case shows how project economics can remain contested for years. Wind power tariff monitoring should include historical petition numbers and hearing updates, GERC Order, Wind Tariff, Lalpur Wind Farm, Renewable Tariff, GUVNL.

GUVNL’s latest Short term power contract covers RTC scaling from 500 MW in late February to 1000 MW in April, with tapering to 800 MW through June, alongside defined evening peak strips. The bid follows a non-financial plus IPO stage and 120-minute fixed e-reverse auction.

Structural tightening is visible. Interstate bidders are subject to 3.50% regional loss loading. Tariff is single-part and all-inclusive up to delivery point, with no escalation. The Short term power contract restricts change-in-law relief and embeds transmission, SLDC charges and taxes within discovered price. LC-backed payment security is mandatory.

Oversubscription control is explicit. If total offered quantity exceeds twice the requisition, H1 elimination applies iteratively. The Short term power contract therefore discourages artificial volume anchoring. Liquidity screening through EMD and CPG ensures only balance-sheet-strong participants bid at scale.

Deviation and diversion penalties are unusually strict. Beyond 15% deviation, tariff compensation escalates, and diversion can trigger double-tariff damages with debarment up to one year. For DISCOMs Latest News tracking, this signals preference for scheduling fidelity over exchange arbitrage.

Identical discovered tariffs across blocks suggest compressed price discovery rather than negotiated differentiation. The Short term power contract effectively behaves like a quasi medium-term risk containment tool, Short Term Power, Power Sector Reforms, GUVNL, Thermal Power Procurement, Energyline India.Detailed evaluation tables and clause mapping are available at EnergylineIndia.com.

Renewable projects moved into a tighter risk framework after GUVNL awarded 500 MW of solar capacity at Rs 2.44–2.45 per unit. While the headline tariff mirrors recent market levels, the contract structure quietly reassigns most grid, delivery, and performance risk to developers.

Tariff discovery shows extreme compression. One block of 150 MW cleared at Rs 2.44 per unit and the remaining 350 MW at Rs 2.45 per unit. The 0.4 percent spread reflects reverse-auction convergence rather than strategic pricing diversity. The RfS design confines success to L1 plus two percent, forcing bidders to converge at the same floor.

All transmission charges, losses, and evacuation responsibilities sit with the generator. Even changes in CTU charges or losses are excluded from change-in-law treatment. Over a 25-year PPA, this transforms variable grid costs into a fixed commercial exposure that must be absorbed or hedged by the developer.

CUF discipline deepens this exposure. The minimum CUF is set at 22 percent. Once declared, it must be maintained for the full term. Under-generation attracts compensation at 150 percent of the PPA tariff. At awarded prices below Rs 2.50 per unit, this becomes a material cash outflow risk.

SCSD is fixed at 24 months. Delay damages are Rs 23.20 lakh per MW, matching the PBG value. Delays beyond six months trigger termination of uncommissioned capacity.

For Renewable projects, this tender shows how Solar power projects are being reshaped in Latest power sector tenders, Renewables, GUVNL, Solar Tender, Energy Contracts, India Power.

Full verified coverage is available on EnergylineIndia.com.

By a professional energy-sector journalist | Originally published on EnergyLineIndia.com

Gujarat’s winter power strategy is now in motion. Petition No. 2569 of 2025, filed before the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC), reveals Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited’s (GUVNL) detailed blueprint to manage the high-stakes December–March window — a season where volatility, not demand, defines the grid.

GUVNL’s move isn’t routine. It’s a deliberate hedge a winter power insurance policy designed to secure supply at predictable rates through Round-the-Clock (RTC) and peak power procurements.

This strategy ensures Gujarat won’t have to scramble later, when real-time prices spike.

Winter isn’t about demand it’s about volatility

Between December and March, Gujarat’s system faces sharper risks:

Wind collapses

Solar hours shrink

Hydro dispatch stays fixed

Industrial clusters run full throttle

GUVNL’s procurement design directly reflects this reality:

500–800 MW RTC power: the risk-absorbing base layer.

500–600 MW Peak power: the volatility shield for the 6–10 p.m. risk window.

By asking the Commission to adopt tariffs discovered through the DEEP portal’s reverse auction, GUVNL is paying a controlled premium now — instead of facing unpredictable costs later.

What bidder behaviour reveals

The petition’s technical reports tell a clear story about market psychology this winter:

RTC drew the most competition. Predictable revenue makes RTC contracts attractive for suppliers.

Peak slots saw fierce last-minute trimming. Everyone wanted the lucrative evening block, but margins were razor-thin.

Reverse auctions worked as designed. Prices compressed within narrow bands proof that competition is real, but still rational.

In short: everyone wanted in, but nobody was reckless.

For GUVNL, it’s price insurance not capacity hoarding

Gujarat’s base power remains strong. Its coal and lignite fleet is stable, and renewable additions are consistent.

But winter risk isn’t about base-load — it’s about:

evening peaks,

older thermal units tripping, and

renewable variability.

Short-term procurement gives GUVNL flexibility without long-term cost commitments. Even if the winter tariff looks slightly higher, it’s still cheaper than buying at double-digit exchange rates during scarcity hours.

So this petition isn’t just regulatory paperwork it’s strategic risk management.

Why this matters for the wider sector

Two trends stand out across India’s short-term market:

Winter procurement is now structural. GUVNL has institutionalised the December–March buying cycle setting a model other states are beginning to follow.

Reverse auctions compress margins, not opportunities. Tight competition hasn’t scared off suppliers it’s made the short-term market more disciplined, predictable, and transparent.

The bottom line

Petition No. 2569 of 2025 isn’t just about adopting discovered tariffs. It’s GUVNL’s strategic bet on a volatile winter and an attempt to stay ahead of the market curve.

The crowded bid field shows how valuable the December–March window has become. In Gujarat, winter isn’t just a season anymore it’s a procurement cycle. And GUVNL has chosen to enter early, lock in discipline, and let the reverse auction do the work.

Originally reported and analysed by EnergyLineIndia.com Written by a professional energy-sector journalist.

For more

GUVNL withdraws subsidy to 4,000 solar projects – ET EnergyWorld

Ahmedabad: State-run Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) has withdrawn subsidy to small-scale distributed solar projects, affecting about 4000 projects with an aggregate capacity of around 2500 MW signed power. The purchase price of power produced was fixed at Rs 2.83 per unit which was already far lower than other states like Rajasthan and Maharashtra, where they set Power Purchase…