The tsunami that beat skyscapers.
The tsunami that struck an Alaskan fjord at 5:26 a.m. in 2025 sloshed higher than the height of the top floor of One World Trade Center in NY. It reached 1,578 ft (481 m) up the slopes of the fjord, making it the 2nd-highest tsunami ever recorded. It would have easily washed over the World Trade Center had it not been for its spire. The wave formed a seiche, which is a standing wave that sloshed back & forth in the fjord for over a day. This is unlike a tsunami that moves. Think of it like a giant, natural bathtub slosh that rocks back & forth at the bathtub's own frequency. Because the fjord is long, narrow, enclosed & steep-walled, it formed the perfect geological conditions for a seiche. This was only the 2nd time such a seiche has been recorded.
The cause of the tsunami was a massive landslide that dropped 2.1 billion cubic feet (60 million cubic meters) of rock into the water. Fortunately, no one was hurt or killed by the tsunami because no one was in the fjord at the time. A tour boat had been there 12 hours earlier; if the timing had been different, the casualty count could have been catastrophic. In fact, no one saw or heard the wave, but satellite images & seismic data confirmed its occurrence. The only tsunami bigger than the Juneau one was another Alaskan tsunami, which holds the record for the largest tsunami ever, in 1958 in Lituya, which reached 1,720 ft (524 m) & was also triggered by a massive rockfall. That tsunami wave obliterated a forest on the opposite slope, & 2 people in a fishing boat were killed. The reason Alaska is home to such monsters is that rapid glacier retreat removes structural support from steep slopes. Their deep fjords allow huge water displacement, & their steep walls amplify runup. Alaska's sparse population means such events often go unnoticed. But just as if a tree falls in a forest & nobody's around to hear it, it does not mean it doesn't (or didn't) occur.
Hazard models predicted something like 300-600 ft for a collapse of that size; instead, 1,580 ft was generated at Juneau. This means current models underestimate runup in deep, narrow fjords. It's not the size of the tsunami that counts. We all remember the horrific & deadly tsunami that hit Indonesia on December 26, 2004, which killed 230,000 people across 14 countries. But the wave height of the Indian Ocean was only 20-100 ft high (6-30 m). The Indonesian tsunami was caused by a 9.1-9.3 megathrust earthquake that displaced hundreds of miles (km) of seafloor by several meters, generating as much as 10¹⁸ joules of energy. Think of 1 followed by 18 zeros, or 1 quintillion. If you had that many pennies, you could cover the entire surface of the Earth twice & still have some left over. A 20-30 ft wave hitting a megacity is catastrophic, whereas Alaska's 1,500 & 1,700 ft wave tsunamis hit no towns, no villages, no infrastructure & no permanent population in the areas the waves struck.