Gandhi was hailed, never questioned and it's never mentioned that he is the one who normalised soft hindutva. We have Gandhian DPSPs in our constitution about prohibiting the slaughter of cattle (which is problematic because why tf state can decide what can people eat or not eat? And then the fact that cattle was a food source of the most marginalized castes, as well as a source of their income just makes it worse). Same goes for his misogyny.

Now, people are continuously ignoring the red flags of Sonam wangchuk just because he's a symbol of resistance. It is also necessary to understand that symbols are for simple minded people.

Dude supported BJP before 2019, which is a red flag in itself because no decent person ever supported BJP.

His wife continuously pushes soft hindutva, sanatan narrative even when it is not necessary(IN FACT when the cops were brutally beating the students, and students tried to take shelter, the temples shut their door. On the other hand gurdwara and mosques not only gave them shelter, protected them from the cops and provided them with food rest and security. Two of the most demonised minorities Sikhs and Muslims came together to help students, they didn't see any religion.) CJP was a completely secular movement and she colored it saffron. Not to mention she also denies the Aryan migration theory( which is a fact).

It is funny to see people blindly trusting him and applauding him when they essentially did not achieve anything, in fact they did not even have any goals except the resignation of the education minister. Now we have a worse one, so congratulations.

"Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today I am wise, so I am changing myself."

--Gandhi