Pipeline or rail? Dilemma offers a false choice with two destructive paths. A third way is clear: Keep it in the ground.
Weāre doing our part to build support for climate policy with the Future Power campaign. If youāre tired of opposing fossil fuel projects ad hocāif youāre ready to envision and achieve a just, equitable 21st century energy transformationāsign up to hear more about Future Power today.
Photo credit: Energyandcapital.com
Whatās Happening
American oil and gas production is booming. Extraction in some states, like North Dakota, is reaching millions of barrels a dayābut they have to get that product from wells to destinations that are often hundreds of miles away at ports in the Gulf and on the East and West Coasts.
The boom has driven a frenzied effort to build more oil and gas pipelines, but production is outstripping pipeline capacity. Due to that lack of built infrastructure, producers are defaulting to their only other option for transporting fuel: by rail.
Rail is a clear second choice. Itās more expensive than a pipeline, and more dangerous: Just this year oil-by-rail accidents destroyed a building in Pennsylvania, polluted water and displacement of 2,000 residents in West Virginia, and set the James River aflame in Virginia. Ā
As accidents pile up, many are calling for an end to transporting oil by rail. In particular, pipeline advocates point to rail as needlessly unsafe. However, the reality is that the mode of transit isnāt the problemāitās the cargo thatās dangerous. The only way to avoid tragedy is to quit fossil fuels altogether.
Oil-by-rail is bad news
With 40 times more oil being hauled on U.S. railways in 2015 than in 2005, devastating accidents are destined to occur. Larry Mann, author of the āFederal Railroad Safety Act of 1970ā warned 25 years ago, āOne day a community is going to get wiped out by a freight train. Well, in 2013 that happened and unless something changes itās going to happen again.ā
The federal government has predicted an average of 10 oil train derailments a year in the next two decades. New train routes are going directly through population centers, and it is only a matter of chance that a tragedy hasnāt occurred, as it did in Quebec in 2013. A derailment near a population center, Department of Transportation researchers warn, could result in up to 200 deaths and $4.5 billion in damages.
But oil is bad news, period
So whatās the solution to oil transport by rail? Well, many think that being anti-oil trains means being pro-pipelines. This is simply not the case. Instead of choosing the lesser of two evils, we must see the bigger picture: Pipelines arenāt safe, either. They leak, burst, and explode, malicing public health, water supplies, and wildlife, and the regulatory regime is just as weak for pipelines as it is for oil-by-rail.
However you transport oil and gas, it is still dangerous to mine and even more dangerous to burn. Just this week, in a headline reminiscent of the Shell disaster in 2010, four workers were killed in a fire on a Gulf oil platform. Spills, leakages, fires, and other accidents put laborers squarely in harmās way.
We havenāt even gotten to the biggest point of all: America should be scaling its oil and gas production down, not up. An immediate transition to renewable energy (which you can read more about here) is the only thing standing between our society and a climate crisisāand if you thought an oil spill was bad, ask yourself if youād like to roll the dice on planetary collapse.
The lesser of two evils is still an evil; saying pipelines are safer than rail is like saying itās safer to have a rifle to your head than a shotgun. Oil isnāt safe in a pipeline, and itās not safe in a railcar: Itās safe in the ground.
The answer to pipeline-or-rail is, in fact, none of the above. The only answer is an end to President Obamaās āall-of-the-aboveā energy policy, one that involves an immediate transition away from fossil fuels and towards investment in clean energy.
It may seem like weāre on our way. While itās certainly good news that the massive Energy East pipeline will be delayed for at least two years, itās clear that we can no longer hope to dismantle the fossil fuel industry piece by pieceāwith time running out, it is more important than ever that American leadership steers the world toward tackling the climate crisis with decisive, comprehensive domestic energy policy.











