#fise

It is possible, yes, but depending through which theory you look at it. Some JCF variant and CT will consider any type combination is possible, even if some less common.

An ISFP 3 is more likely to have a fixation on Te, for sure. In CT, FiSe l--l (ll-l, l-ll) are a thing and it is meant as something normal, and not just an unhealthy manifestation of a type. JCF theories tend to adopt the notion of loops and grips, which I wouldn't say are completely false tbh, but it discards the possibility of having a healthy relation to your lower functions, which I also personally disagree with.

In any case, from the perspective where lower functions can be developed healthily, they are also not deemed as weaker than higher functions. Functions that are weaker are the ones devalued in our consciousness, and this could happen to any function, even the lead to some degree, which also cause a lot of mental distress. This means that it wouldn't be a counter productive combo. It would make you more likely become a l--l dev, which implies you would have psychologically accepted to sacrifice endless perfectionism for efficiency and practicality to some degree. It creates a much more structured, scrupulous and uptight ISFP, who is concerned to actualize in the world the Fi Idealism that they have cultivated over time. It also makes that sort of ISFP more ambiverted, so more agile into switching their attention from internal to external objects without being completely drained. (Note: I don't mean being more social here. The notion of extroversion and introversion are meant as the capacity to focus on internal or external objects; situation, issues, opportunities, etc.).

Actually, FiSe l--l and ll-l are pretty common in the celebrity world. It's not surprising knowing they often are 3 core/fix and given the requirement in that kind of environment to strive, perform and outlive it.

In the end, it is a possible combo, not unlikely or stretched, and neither dysfunctional, quite on the contrary. It depends from which theory you address it, but I do believe cognitive function manifest in more flexible way than the classic hierarchy with linear development. It's up to you to see if it helps you understand yourself better and so, if it can make sense in how you conceive typology.

Készült velem egy interjú az "Indonéz lelemények" című kiállításom kapcsán. 😊❤️🇮🇩 Aki lemaradt vagy kicsit újra belekukkantana a kiállításba. 

Ante cientos de habitantes del Municipio de Tequisquiapan a quienes entregó la rehabilitación de la Unidad Deportiva “Emiliano Zapata”, el gobernador Francisco Domínguez afirmó que su administración no se detendrá en la construcción de obra en beneficio de colonias y comunidades. “Seguiremos poniendo toda nuestra voluntad de trabajo con hechos para dar resultados a las familias de Tequisquiapan”, afirmó ante el alcalde Antonio Mejía Lira.

Hey guys!

As usual this is based all on my own personal experience and observations and is not backed up by any empirical evidence.

I think most would agree that one thing that INFPs and ISFPs have in common is their love--dare I say hunger--for all things aesthetically pleasing. However occasionally I will stumble upon the thoughts of others claiming that ISFPs are more artistic (because, you know, senses) and more connected to nature (again with the senses) I’m an INFP. But suddenly I’m also the kid on the playground shouting that their shirt is the bluest. 

No! INFPs are more artistic! INFPs are definitely the MOST connected to nature! It’s impossible to more connected to nature than an INFP!

Okay, first things first: those are just stereotypes. Remember, MBTI is about cognition, that is how your brain processes information (to put it simply). And what do aesthetics have to do with processing information? Not much. Even if that weren’t the case, if you look at the function stacks for both types they have the same dominant and inferior function--Fi and Te--so very similar. But I’m getting sidetracked.

What I actually want to do is feed the stereotypes and talk about my relationship with my own aesthetic and what I think it might be for a stereotypical ISFP. 

I love pretty things. My aesthetic is basically anything covered in floral prints or anything to do with wildflowers. Very forest nymphish. Also everything that Anthropologie sells. Throw in some industrial bricks and pipes and bare light bulbs and gosh I’m getting tingly just thinking about it. As you can probably imagine, I collect of pictures of such on Tumblr, Pinterest, etc. And I imagine these impossibly beautiful scenes a lot. Did I say impossibly? Yes. That’s the problem. I can’t really recreate any of this. I could imagine myself having a picnic in a beautiful field of wildflowers, laying in the grass in some off-white cottony dress. But were I actually to do that, I don’t think it would be as satisfying. I think I’m just always far too much in my head to every truly appreciate my actual surroundings. 

I feel that ISFPs are probably more into actually being surrounded by these things. Their imagination might not be enough for them if they were in a grey cubicle, for example (unless minimalist office settings are their aesthetic). Maybe that shows more to other people. They may go to great lengths to beautify their surroundings. But I would too. But when I do it it’s because those things that I’m collecting are a window into the even more beautiful landscape I’ve created in my mind. 

Maybe they create art because it’s beautiful, maybe I create art because I’m trying to capture and pin down something that’s for the most part intangible.