#feminsm

Men hurt women. Not just with their fists, but also with the hatred they angrily spew behind their phones and computers. These influencers have raised a new generation of boys and young men with new, radical beliefs, and misogyny is at the core of these ideologies. These opinions have caused detrimental impacts towards women and feminism as a whole, yet we play to dumb in fear of offending these men. Today I’ll explore how these figures in the media have encouraged gender based violence, the dismissal of sexual assault victims, the normalisation of misogyny and why social media platforms need to take action on these types of content creators. 

50 year ago, women couldn’t get credit cards or home loans in their name. this is an absolutely fucking code red thing

*all* feminists trans inclusive or not should be be freaking the fuck out about this

here’s a comment box if you want to say something

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CFPB-2025-0039-0001

The Democrats and their leaders bear responsibility for the factions they tolerate, empower, or fail to check. The Democratic Party's relationship with the DSA is not uniform "love," but includes significant tolerance, alliances, and institutional leniency that have enabled DSA growth. Accountability ultimately comes through voters, primaries, and elections — not vague moral blame.

Many moderate Democrats oppose the DSA. Examples include heavy spending against DSA candidates in some NY primaries, establishment interventions (e.g., Wisconsin governor race), and figures like Tom Suozzi or others criticizing the far-left shift.

Some Democrats have defeated DSA challengers and at the same time, but the DSA deliberately works inside the Democratic Party rather than as a third party. They use the Democrats' ballot line, infrastructure, voter base as well as Democratic officials, donors, and institutions that are "Democrat friendly".

Democrats openly welcomed DSA-endorsed candidates into their party's fold. DNC leadership failed to impose ideological guardrails (e.g., no widespread endorsements or rule changes to block entry-ism). The DNC allowed their platform to shift leftward on issues like policing, housing, immigration, and Israel that overlap with DSA priorities.

Prominent Democrats like Bernie Sanders and AOC, shared stages, co-endorsed and did not condemn extreme DSA positions. And before you say it, I'll go ahead and admit that this mirrors how parties historically handle factions; take the Tea Party / GOP in the 2010s, as an example, but the difference is structural: The Democrats' "big-tent approach + low primary turnout rewarded organized DSA activists.

Trump calls the DSA, "Communist". Defenders, like Jacobin’s Magazine, portray them as moderate social democrats seeking Nordic-style policies without revolution. Ex-DSA Member, Jake Altman says the truth is in their actions and new platform: a transformative agenda to fundamentally remake (or “dismantle”) American institutions, economy, and foreign policy. I for one, lean toward Trump and Altman's viewpoint, not only that but the DSA uses Socialist / Communist graphic and written propaganda as well as willingly admit they are out to totally destroy and radically America.

Don't believe me? Go to their website and see for yourself. The DSA's plans are to:

Structural/governmental: End the presidency and Supreme Court; other changes implying major constitutional overhaul (e.g., related to Senate, Electoral College).

Criminal justice: Abolishing prisons (and in broader reporting, police).

Economic/social: Universal free housing, elimination of all debt, public ownership/control of major corporations and key industries.

Foreign policy: Closing all overseas U.S. military bases, lifting sanctions on countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran.

Broader vision: “Workers deserve more” through massive redistribution, public control of “common goods” (housing, healthcare, education, transport, energy), and shifting power from corporations/capitalism to the working class.

Basically, it's a plan of idiotic extreme proportions that would bankrupt and corrupt America even more than what it is already. Here's EXACTLY what the DSA has in plans and you can see HERE for even more.

This ideology must be culled. We're seeing the "Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times." meme come slowly into full point if we let the DSA gain power.

The DSA's end goal is basically what they want you to believe is "dEmOCrAtTic sOcIALism" — but it's not, it's more Communism than anything. It's heavy government control of the economy, wealth redistribution, public ownership of big stuff. Straight-up class warfare doesn't sell super well to most Americans anymore. So they've gotten smart about it: they bundle economic socialism with cultural and social weapons to build bigger coalitions and weaken opposition. I think of it as the economic radicalism riding shotgun with identity politics. Old-school Marxism was all about workers vs. capitalists. Modern versions (critical theory, etc.) shifted to culture — pitting oppressed vs. oppressors based on race, gender, sexuality, nationality and religion. The DSA and their allies lean hard into this. They frame America /Western society as inherently rigged by "systems" (patriarchy, whiteness, capitalism, colonialism). This turns normal disagreements into moral crusades and justifies tearing down institutions.

The DSA has aligned itself with radical-feminism, but the DSA-friendly version pushes the idea that traditional family, gender roles, and even biological sex are "oppressive tools of the patriarchy", which gullible females looking for clicks and stupid young cucked-men, hoping to get laid by white-knighting, buy into. This helps break down our social structure and creates dependency on the state (more single moms, more welfare needs, more government as the solution). It also splits people — men vs. women, "allies" vs. "problematic" — which makes unified pushback harder along with. Mix this with DEI, Radical Islam, identity politics, cancel culture, speech control, attacks on the family, meritocracy, borders, policing, the Constitution, add in radical environmentalists, open-borders groups, anti-Israel activists, and postmodern academics, and the DSA gets it's wish of taking over the DNC because --- say it with me --- the DNC is sees itself as a big tent of "oppressed" groups against "the man" -- but only when "the man" isn't itself.

Not every DSA member is a Mega-Karl Marx-Mastermind plotting this in a basement...some just want nicer welfare policies. But the smarter operators and the ideology as a whole treat these cultural tools as force multipliers. They divide people so they can conquer politically. It's effective at gaining power in blue cities and college crowds, but it also creates the backlash we're seeing. A lot of normies (including working-class Dems) are getting fed up with the endless grievance and institutional decay. That's why exposing the full package — not just the "free stuff" part matters and I don't know if you've noticed, but as the DSA continues its BS, some Democrats are leaving the DNC and moving "to the right".

At the end of the day, it's on the voters. Primaries, general elections, donations, and public pressure — that's how you and I hold them responsible. When DSA-style policies lead to higher crime, worse housing shortages, or other headaches, people will punish the Democrat brand at the ballot box. We've already seen some of that backlash in recent cycles.

Political parties get the factions they tolerate. If enough of us regular voters decide the Democratic Party has gone too far left by cuddling up to the DSA, we need to make them hurt electorally. Yes, the so-called "tolerance" the DNC has allowed and its alliances to the DSA need to have consequences. Democratic leaders who platformed, ignored, or accommodated DSA growth own part of the results need to be taken out. How? We do it straightforward and legal: organize, vote, primary, and persuade on policy outcomes. We the people ultimately decide how the Democratic Party's leftward tolerance is a strategic error.

Return of the goddess—Edward whitmont

Men who hate women and the women who love them—Susan forward

The crone—Barbara Walker

Female chauvinist pigs—Ariel levy

Bad feminist—Roxanne gay

When god was a woman—Merlin stone

The beauty myth—Naomi wolf

Cinderella complex—collete dowling

Reasonable creatures—katha pollitt

Born female—Caroline Bird

Femininity—Susan brown miller

Second sex—Simone de Beauvoir

The feminine mystique—Betty Friedman

The work of being watched—mark andrejevic

We are your sisters—Dorothy sterling

Gyn/Ecology—mary Daly

Toward a new psychology of women—Jean baker miller

Fasting girls—Joan Jacob’s brumberg

The prostitution of sexuality—kathleen barry

Women’s health, politics, and power: essays on sex/gender, medicine, and public health —Elizabeth fee

The seven daughters of Eve—Bryan Sykes

The baby business—deborah spar

Living dolls the return of sexism—Natasha Walter

La sociedad exige a las mujeres comportarse de maneras conservadoras y bajo roles impuestos bastante duros. Pero por otra parte, los medios y la publicidad explotan el cuerpo de las mujeres, eso sí, siempre al servicio del deseo masculino. Es un doble estándar antiquísimo. Sasha también cree que es un conflicto muy grande.