ok one last thing actually and I apologize in advance for how fanwanky this will be but I think it's necessary to say. which is that I and many others in the audience are obviously annoyed with Bolaire. but I don't think there's any like, interpersonal conflict at the table at this time and frankly I think it's bizarre that people keep jumping to the idea that that's what people are saying. Like no, the issue is "We don't think that Taliesin actually thought about how this character fits into the story being told, especially as it's being told by 13 other people and his premise requires him to be The Only Guy Who Gets It even though one of the 13 other people is the DM, and also his statements on Tale Gate are kind of off," not "there is active conflict."
I think that Brennan's largely just been redirecting a lot of plot-critical things to other players, and being very clear with Taliesin about the potential consequences (see: Terminamariya casting Disintegrate) and I think that like, Hal is mad at Bolaire in-game but Liam has no quarrel with Taliesin. Like, I am interested in seeing what happens in the narrative since I do not believe that Bolaire (and, as many of us suspect, Taliesin's) feelings about Thjazi are going to be validated in an objective sense - ie, I think people in-story will be sympathetic and say it sucks he was blackmailed, but I don't think he's going to like, succeed in getting them to believe that Thjazi was actually a horrible person - but that's again, in-narrative. I have no idea how Taliesin will respond if that's the case but like, my guess is that at worst the cast will have a shardgate-esque argument off screen and move on.
(I also think that a lot of this idea that there's Deep Cast Conflict comes from the fact that people defending Bolaire initially argued that the problem is that no one is digging into the character when Taliesin is CLEARLY inviting it and like. straight up I don't fucking think that was happening. I think that's a pure fabrication. Like if it was then yeah, it's Taliesin's responsibility to talk to people, and if he's talked to people and they're not engaging with Bolaire then that is a problem...but I don't even think that's an accurate assessment of what's going on. Which is funny, it's like you guys made up a problem, and then got mad at the idea that people think there's a problem, and you are the guys who made up that problem, and the fans you're mad at do not think that's the problem.)
More generally, while Campaign 3 I think demonstrated that no, actually, the cast might not talk about all things and/or disagreements might not come to the surface until after the fact (and indeed the cast's closeness might cause them to let things that are a narrative issue but not an interpersonal one slide), I and most other people are talking about our concerns with Bolaire and how they stem from both in-game and out-of-game statements and actions. I don't want the cast to be arguing but frankly that's not relevant to the current criticism in the first place. I think a lot of people are just either mad that people don't like their favorite character, in which case, skill issue; or mad that people engage in discourse in a fandom on tumblr dot com, in which case, lmao and also skill issue.
















