Art created by the Gondi people of central India. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sumita_Roy_Dutta
seen from China
seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Ireland

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Puerto Rico
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Poland
Art created by the Gondi people of central India. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sumita_Roy_Dutta

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hi! I’ve been reading a bit about the Aryan Migration Theory lately. I was wondering what your thoughts are on it, if you don’t mind sharing.
All humans first evolved in Africa. Early hominids (the ancestors of both humans and apes) evolved in Africa. We humans and our closest relative chimpanzees had our last common ancestor 5.5 million years ago, and chimpanzees & humans had our last common ancestor with gorillas 8 million years ago. The cradle of humanity is in Africa. The Homo genus evolved from some species of Australopithecines in Africa. The earliest species of Homo genus, according to the latest scientific evidence, is Homo Habilis who lived around 2 million years ago. There were several hominin species living in Africa. These species were human-like, but not humans simply because they weren't our ancestors directly, but the cousins of our ancestors. All of those cousins and their offspring went extinct in Africa, or perhaps mixed with the Homo Sapiens, our lineage. The hominins that had migrated to Eurasia evolved into the Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. and new fossil discoveries will further illuminate the history of the migration of hominins in the span of over a million years. The Homo sapiens, that is the ancestor of all humans today, migrated out of Africa around 50,000 years ago and encountered strange looking creatures in Eurasia, who resembled them but weren't quite like them. They competed for the same resources, likely had conflicts, and there's evidence of Neanderthals mating with Sapiens. The last "pure" Neanderthals went extinct 40,000 years ago.
As you can see, all hominins migrated from Africa to Eurasia. Paleolithic hominin species, including humans, in the Indian subcontinent either intermixed or went extinct, but humans kept migrating to the subcontinent. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers migrated to India. Neolithic farmers from the Zagros mountains migrated to India. The Bronze Age tribes migrated to India. They all also migrated to and from the subcontinent.
If you're asking whether Vedic people were native to India or if they were migrators or invaders, then it depends purely on your world view and the ideology you possess at the moment. We have established in the previous paragraphs that all humans migrated out of Africa to Eurasia. This means that no human is native to the Indian subcontinent. If your follow-up question is that which tribe was the first to migrate to India, then that too is hard to tell because the very first tribes may have already gone extinct or just simply mixed with the newcomers. If you're still wondering whether an Austro-Asiatic tribe, "Dravidian" tribe or a Vedic tribe migrated earlier to the Indian subcontinent, then you'll find a bunch of highly politicised search results online. In the Indian Republic, it's, quite frankly, forbidden to tell the truth because the "Dravidian nationalists", "Indian secularists" and "Hindu nationalists" all appeal to pseudoscience and made-up origin myths for polarisation and vote bank politics. Especially in the "Dravidianist" separatist political landscape, archaeological excavations spark unreal controversy. Many archeological surveys in India are sealed from the public domain for this very reason.
I ask you, are you ready to see the uproar if anyone talked publicly about how austro-asiatic tribes migrated later to the Indian subcontinent than the Vedic tribes did? This would open up the question that how legitimate is the "Adivasi" term or the "Scheduled Tribe" category in the Indian affirmative action system. Are you ready to go tell a "Dravidianist" that his ancestors were neolithic farmers from the Zagros mountains?
If your intention of this question was to ask how native the Vedic tribes are to India, then all you need to do is read what kind of flora and fauna are mentioned in the Rigveda. Here's a mention of Ficus Religiosa (asvattha, peepal) in the Rigveda 1.164.20. And in this Rigvedic verse, Agni is compared to a bull of the Bos Indicus species, which is native to India. There's no peepal or humped back cows in the steppes of Ukraine!
By the way, the term Aryan was made up in the 19th century by European eugenicists. It has nothing to do with the word arya, which has a very specific definition and it does not allude to race. For example, the victorious Vedic tribes called fellow Vedic tribes, who were defeated in dasarajna yuddha (the battle of 10 kings), as anarya.
I hope you read this, and after that, do tell your thoughts, opinions.
Karuppuswamy - கருப்பசாமி - संगानी बाबा
Check out my redesign of Sivan! The pose is actually interesting this time!
Aesthetic of the languages on earth : Malayalam Malayalam is Dravidian language spoken by 37 million people over Kerala and southern India. It's an official language of the state of Kerala, Lakshadweep and Mahé in India.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
candy
late 13c., "crystallized sugar," from Old French çucre candi "sugar candy," ultimately from Arabic qandi, from Persian qand "cane sugar," probably from Sanskrit khanda "piece (of sugar)," perhaps from Dravidian (compare Tamil kantu "candy," kattu "to harden, condense").
𝗪𝗘 𝗟𝗢𝗩𝗘 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗢𝗠𝗦 𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗘!
Unlike most familial words, the term 'mother ' has echoed across human societies for at least 15,000 years, dating back to a time when glaciers covered much of the Earth and woolly mammoths roamed freely.
Linguists recently traced the origins of ancient words shared across diverse languages like Uralic, Dravidian, and Inuit-Yupik.
In their research, they uncovered 23 "ultraconserved" words, linguistic relics that have barely changed over millennia.
Among these enduring words is 'mother.'
This can be traced back to their vital role in early human communities, where women stayed in the camps to care for the children while the men ventured into the wilderness in search of food.
While it may not shock us that the word 'mother' survived the passage of time, its place alongside other primal words like 'fire' and 'worm' speaks volumes.
It underscores how deeply ingrained the concept of motherhood is in our collective human experience.
Even as the world around them evolved, our ancestors instinctively understood the power of this bond, a bond we continue to honor and celebrate today.
Harappan Dancer
This is a female dancer from the Harappan civilization that spread over the Indus Valley in South Asia between 3300 and 1300 BC, being the first urban culture known to develop in the subcontinent. Her jewelry is referenced from a bronze statuette uncovered at the Harappan site of Mohenjo-daro in what is now northern Pakistan, but whereas the original sculpture showed a nude figure, I gave my version a top and loincloth to make it safer for work.