It seems clear that infanticide is the wave of the future in the West

A new Dark Age is upon us. The therapeutic culture has perverted our culture’s moral imagination. Fail to affirm someone’s gender fantasy by refusing to use their “preferred pronouns” and one can face the loss of livelihood. Suggest that only women menstruate and, like J. K. Rowling, one can receive threats of rape and murder. Fail to back Pride Month, surely the most blatant current form of Western imperialism, and be decried as a hate-filled bigot. We truly live in a world where good is called evil and evil is called good and where the murder of innocents is seen as a sign of moral progress. Indeed, the former Dark Ages perhaps don’t seem quite so dark in comparison...

It is well-known that 1 in 20 Canadian deaths now comes at the hands of Canada’s own government.

The Netherlands, a new boundary has now been crossed: The government has recently reported the first euthanizing of a child between the ages of 1 and 12.

The West is already listing hard towards a culture of eugenics. IVF and surrogacy cannot in practice be separated from eugenic considerations.

Iceland’s boast that it has virtually eliminated Down syndrome is a thin euphemism for its elimination of people with Down syndrome.

 Given that psychological distress is already a criterion for making one a candidate for euthanasia in the Netherlands, it is surely a small move to make psychological distress caused by another who lacks agency—an infant or an elderly person with dementia—as grounds for the termination of life.

The truth is that the euthanizing of children with terminal illnesses is only plausible as a practice within a culture where other values are already broadly intuitive. Where family ties carry no innate moral responsibility. Where immediate psychological well-being is the essence of the good life. Where moral challenges are easily dispatched as technical problems. And those intuitions are no monopoly of Canada, Iceland, or the Netherlands. They are the default cultural settings of the West as a whole. In this context, countries that present the most extreme actions of today are likely only the avant garde of what will be considered tomorrow to be routine, even socially necessary, actions. And in the process, the weak will become weaker and the vulnerable will become more vulnerable. Infanticide is the wave of the future because it comports so well with the imperative of the therapeutic society.

The first line of the rulers of the Dark Ages… Was not started by one egotistical Queen, but rather the manipulation and fallout of such a young Queen… The burden of a crown should never fall to such a young head. Luna- She was named Queen much younger than any before her and after, with a couple notable exceptions… Poor child, people saw a flower that they pinned to themselves to achieve their own goals and cared not for the Queendom or the Queen… But this rose… had a few thorns.

Helia- Quite an exceptional Mage, the same couldn’t necessarily be said for her skills as Queen. True she was smart but, disinterested in the whims of royals or politics of a nation, preferred spending time working on spells.