Overall, I think my critique went better than I was expecting. Most people had very helpful and encouraging things to say. Both Claire and Trevor suggested that I should have more of my tapestry works (at least a couple more rows) so that it would allow the viewer more space to walk through them. Trevor also suggested that I should have more leaves on the ground and possibly use them to make a pathway through the tapestries. Many people pointed out that I had laid the the leaves in such a way that resembled a coffin (oops). I definitely was not aware of that and did not mean for it to come off that way. I will definitely play more with perhaps filling a space with leaves or placing them in a more organic shape. Tina felt that the tapestries were still reminiscent of flags or banners, so maybe I will work on the sizing and/or spacing of them. However, she did approve of how I hung them (yes!). With regard to the video, some felt it was nice but others thought that it made the piece too easy to read. Someone said that maybe I could use the video piece in place of an artist statement. Tina also said the sound on the video was annoying/unnecessary.Ā
I brought up the point that I was afraid of making the work too personal, though the subject matter means a lot to me. Numerous people said that the more personal and specific a work gets, the more relatable it can become. Our guest critic suggested that I make a few pieces that were super personal and just see how they work and maybe show them to a couple of friends and get opinions. They kept reiterating that I would never know until I tried.Ā
Though I was very anxious about this critique, it was very helpful like I said before. Joe said that it felt veryĀ ācontemporaryā and instantly recognized the cyanotype process on the fabrics. I think that this was a big stepping stone for me in working to create an experiential space. Jordan gave great advice with regard to my practice and exploring other materials to incorporate. She said ābe very protective and selective your materialā. I think this was very wise so that I donāt experiment so much so that I lose my original intent with the work.
As I have already said, I am really happy with the result of this critique and I am glad that people found it interesting and engaging.
Regarding other critiques:
I think the critique that had the biggest impact on me was probably Brianna Engās. Everyone acknowledged how deep the work was and how many different levels of interaction were involved in the way people viewed the work to the way Brianna was vulnerable and presented her own moments that she shared with others.
I think Laurenās critique conversation was the most related to my art practice as it was said how she is observant of the moments and the world around her. I gather inspiration from the forms I see in nature and Iām interested in my relationship to the world.
Lisaās critique conversation challenged me the most because I felt that too much time was spent on how she couldāve installed her ceramics on a table and how itās function wouldāve been challenged. I found this frustrating because I personally liked how they were arranged on the wall.
Kailaās critique most surprised me because I wasnāt as familiar with her work. I thought it turned out great but not much critique was given. It was more likeĀ āgood job, this is greatā.
Lastly, I think Kibbiās critique taught me the most about art. I learned that art can live between the tension of two subjects. In her case - fine art and fashion. I think that tension makes art interesting and wonderful.
