There are numerous sources of developing mental, physical and emotional intelligence among children, and something as simple and basic as play time and toys top the list of it all.
The #teaching-learning approach of toy-pedagogy sits at the core of the #curriculum. Here's our 5th episode of #ShishaSarathi by our host, Sonia Relia on Toy Based Pedagogy.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Strategies for Teaching Short Vowel Rule: FLOSS Rule
Strategies for Teaching Short Vowel Rule: FLOSSÂ Rule
The best part of using Orton Gillingham to teach or tutor is that the rules are clearly defined. For the Short Vowel Rules there is FLOSS Rule, “CH Rule,” “J Rule,” and “K Rule.” Here we are going to talk about strategies for teaching FLOSS.
Typically, Short Vowel Rule words are simple looking, one-syllable words that come from the Anglo-Saxon language. Words like, sack, dodge, grass, hatch.…
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
When your day 2 plans get all out of whack, it might just be smartest to start again on Day 3. Here is what I learned today. The curriculum that looked so all encompassing, so entertaining, so thorough from the parent description side; is the most lackluster, uneventful, and boring curriculum I have ever worked on in my whole life. Of course, the kids don’t know I think that, at least they won’t until they read this post. There is no way I am going to make it through High School with these kids and this program. I will say cheers to Khan Academy, the kids pulled almost 2 hours each in Math - because they wanted to... WHOA who are you scary little creatures and what have you done with my children?? Alright, i’m not mad - Math Matters! Now back to the drawing board.Â
After looking at my past courses and rereading the rant I made months ago, I feel that I need to expand on where I think AiPOD fails when educating its students. I would like to reiterate my points from a previous post. In short, there was a failure to:
Get new students to understand what a portfolio is and how to build one, from Day One.
Give students opportunities to work for interns for at least a semester.
Show students how to market themselves.
My Suggestions for the Curriculum
Before I go further, I would like to share the list of courses I took, in the order I took them (with the courses I plan to mention specifically in bold):
1. Strategies for Online Learning (SS100 KQ)
2. Transitional English (ENG095 UA)
3. Fundamentals of Design (FND112 VH)
4. Composition and Language (ENG1010 UI)
5. Color Theory (FND111 YB)
6. Drawing (FND110 UF)
7. Perspective (FND113 XT)
8. Concept Development (G121 P01)
9. Typography (G131 P03)
10. History and Analysis of Design (G132 P05)
11. College Math I (MTH1010 P10)
12. Mixed Media (G210 P01)
13. Introduction to Design Applications (G150 P03)
14. Life Drawing (G120 P02)
15. Digital Image Manipulation (G133 P03)
16. Digital Illustration (G230 P01)
17. Electronic Design (G212 P01)
18. Art History - Prehistory to the Early Modern Era (ART1020 P01)
19. Advanced Typography (G211 P02)
20. Introduction to Communications (COM1010 P04)
21. Design Principles (G224 P03)
22. Corporate Identity (G231 P01)
23. Introduction to Web Design (FND135 P02)
24. College Math II (MTH2010 P01)
25. Packaging Design (G233 P02)
26. Western Civilization I: Antiquity to the Renaissance (HIS2500 P01)
27. Design and Technology (G312 P01)
28. Advertising Design (G412 P01)
29. Portfolio (G313 AS P03)
30. Advanced Communications (COM3010 P01)
I have to say that a big part of the problem was the order in which I took a number of the courses. This was alluded to when I mentioned taking a portfolio course near the end of my education. However, this has more to do with the way in which two other courses were scheduled for me.
IMHO, no one should take Fundamentals of Design or Color Theory before they have been properly prepared for those courses. Courses for Drawing and Perspective and even Life Drawing should be put taken beforehand. I would also argue that Mixed Media should be taken, as well. Also, no one should delve into FND112 VH or FND111 YB without first being introduced to design applications. There was a course for that, but it wasn’t even available when I started taking courses with AiPOD. I had to wait a full year plus for that and the first [mandatory] course I took, Strategies for Online Learning, was eventually taken out of the curriculum. (No offense to my instructor, but that was a pretty worthless course.) Additionally, students need to be taught just what a thumbnail is, preferably during that FND113 XT course.
The general idea should be getting students to receive their design education through a more natural schedule and one that makes the most sense. The courses assigned to students should be scheduled in such a way that the things they learn will build upon each other. To me, it is unreasonable to ask a student to jump into Adobe Illustrator and make full compositions if:
They have little experience drawing, let alone drawing figures and complex objects.
They have been out of practice drawing, like I largely was, for various reasons.
They have little or no experience with Illustrator and/or other important design programs they will use throughout their academic career.
Now, if I think about this even more, I have an issue with how a number of my courses were set up. My Digital Illustration course should have been the culmination of what I learned on the other courses I listed in this post. What I was assigned to do for my FND112 VH final should have instead been an assignment in G230 P01. Another course could have involved the creation of apple/fruit vectors and spot illustrations. In fact, that could have been part of the curriculum for FND111 YB. For both of those courses — or at least for FND112 VH — there was a big jump to go from learning basic skills, using basic shapes, and making abstract compositions to making fully representational ones at the end with little direction. My art and the art of many others would have been much more awesome at certain points if everyone was sufficiently prepared. There would be portfolio-quality works ready for consideration, sooner.
That’s not all. There should have been more of a focus on web design. Yes, while there was a course for that — I learned quite a bit from it — and there were workshops for HTML and Dreamweaver, perhaps the G150 P03 course could have also introduced some bit of coding. Nowadays, it is important for graphic designers to be well-rounded, and adequate skill in coding can be an important tool for self-promotion.
My Suggestions for Internships
Above, I mentioned on issue with the school setting up employment or at least helping its students find internships before graduation. The thing is, there was a program set up for students a year ago…but that was a good time after I graduated and I was still waiting to receive my diploma. There are now internship counselors and internship courses. None of that was even available to me when I was earning my diploma. These things should have been there years ago. Regardless, I still think there are catches to this program the school does have, though.
What about Self-Marketing?
Again, I have to say this is one of the hardest things for people to do, but I think this has a lot to do with internships and web design, as I mentioned earlier. As people make connections to established artists, they may be given quite a few tips to getting their work recognized, building their skill, and building a brand. I feel the school should help with this. Although a few instructors gave me a few helpful links, I needed more from the school. I think students need their work examined more thoroughly by instructors (in terms of building a portfolio) and on a regular basis, especially if those instructors head industries their students hope to enter upon graduation.
Just One More Thing…
This may not necessarily be the school’s fault, but it would also help if we could get some HR managers away from their busy jobs of not hiring people or contacting any prospects to actually tell aspiring designers what exactly it is their bosses want. But I guess that would make it that much harder for people to be turned down. Oh snap. That’s the point, right?