I have the second you on the Cajun should be in a subset section of the Creoles on ancestry report! Not only cause it’s just like true, but I feel like it would be a lot more convenient to have doing ancestry research and stuff. Like if we can get down to specifying like Creole of the Natchitoches region or Creoles of XYZ parish(which I actually again really liked because it does help with ancestry stuff and genealogy research to know which parishes I should go contact)…… why can’t we just have like Acadian Creole.
I don’t know if you know about, Christophe Landry Ph.D either works for or works with ancestry, his Facebook says he’s a research team member(again. I don’t know if that means he works with or works for?). He might be somebody useful to talk to about this? Or have actually the specific reasoning on why ancestry didn’t choose to do that!
Either way, I hope you have a lovely day!
I didn’t know Christopher Landry had a Facebook page, I’ve mainly seen his TikTok page and watched his videos on there. But I did email 23&me about the way they’re misrepresenting Creole identity and how it’s harmful. I haven’t gotten an email back yet, but I will share it once I get a response. I do think both 23&me and Ancestry separate the Creole identity into parishes, but it’s only within the African Diaspora section. So the non black Creoles aren’t included in that if they don’t have African Diaspora in their genetic groups. Same thing for Cajun. It won’t show unless you have European Diaspora












