#caesar augustus

In 1453, the burgeoning glory of the Ottoman Turks claimed their millennium long prize- the Jewel of the Romans, or what was left of them- Constantinople. But even as that city was engulfed in flames and the walls crumbled, Constantine Xi- the last Roman emperor, stood defiant. The Eastern Romans/Byzantines were not merely custodians of Roman glory; they were the living successors. Though their language had shifted and their faith transformed, their spirit remained Roman. From the splendor of Hagia Sophia to the legal reforms of Justinian, Byzantium carried forth the torch of Romulus, Augustus, and Constantine the Great, merging the might of Rome with the intellect and spirituality of Hellenic culture. From the hordes of Hunnic invaders to the resistances shown to Persians, Arabs, and Bulgars sieges- Roman had become, in truth, the shield of Europa during the tumultuous centuries of Late Antiquity.

Even their conquerors, the Ottomans, could not escape the pretentions of the Roman legacy. Even as Mehmet II raised the flag of Osman, he immediately styled himself a Caesar of Rome. The Ottomans went as far as adopting the administrative and cultural frameworks from Byzantium, grafting their Islamic empire onto the rootstock of Roman governance. In that innovation was birthed a Golden Age for the Arab world.

In truth, the fall of Constantinople seemed inevitable and by that point, nothing more than the last ragged breath of a dying wolf. An old and weary wolf, battered by more than a thousand years of internal strife and external assault. Yet this lupine beast fell not with a whimper, but a howl that shattered the barriers of the medieval world. Refugee scholars fled westward, igniting a reintroduction of European kingdoms with their own ancient past. Trade routes were barred, spurring a desire for new and alternative routes. And with the Islamic conquering of the east, a new border and seat for their superpower was now firmly established. Though Rome fell, its legacy seeded the future, ensuring that the ideas and achievements of thousands of years would never perish.

AEGON THE CONQUEROR and TRAJAN OPTIMUS

first of his name and of his dynasty/the man whose name was invoked as a blessing

considered the gold standard of their nation's leadership, both were considered foreigners despite being raised in the land they would come to conquer thanks to their parentage (of valyrian and hispanic descent respectively), and they expanded their empire's borders with almost shocking ease. pragmatic and less prone to egomania than the average member of their profession. overseeing a long period of peace and prosperity to accompany their asskicking, they also both happened to die of a stroke.

AENYS THE FIRST and ALEXANDER SEVERUS

the abomination king/the last of the severans

rulers who were better suited for more peaceful times, ultimately both wound up being seen as weak-willed due to showing reluctance in battle. they wound up defined more by their mothers than their fathers (aenys taking after his in personality and alexander having his mother do most of the ruling) resulting in assassination (probably in one case, definitely in the other).

MAEGOR THE CRUEL and COMMODUS

he who tried to drown the land in its own blood/the slayer of the golden age

the son of a highly competent father, neither of these men thought it beneath them to do their own dirty work committing mass slaughter and ruining a perfectly functional nation. they also made sure to have a lot of sex and torture plenty of people along the way before their premature, if not predictable, violent deaths, leaving everyone else with a massive mess to clean up.

JAEHAERYS THE CONCILIATOR and AUGUSTUS CAESAR

the architect of the golden age/the gravedigger of the republic

the other gold standard of leadership for their nations! both wound up involved in a massively bloody civil war as a teenager and came out victorious despite being more of an intellectual figure than a straightforward warrior. despite this, they were able to use their great political savvy to usher in an era of peace and prosperity, eschewing the ornate imagery of their predecessors in favor of a more humble, but effective propagandistic image. yet for all their accomplishments, they couldn't stop their preferred heirs from dying off before them unexpectedly. on top of that, they got pissed at their daughter for having sex and wound up kicking her off the continent, then grew depressed at the death of most of their loved ones before dying of old age.

VISERYS THE FIRST and CONSTANTIUS CHLORUS

the young king/the midwife of christianity

two men who you'd struggle to call bad leaders. their administration was competent in the face of adversity, if not genius, and in some ways they could even be considered to have progressive values. the successor they wound up choosing and the civil war that followed wound up overshadowing everything else they ever did, however, and so they are often left as a side character in another's story rather than a protagonist in their own right.

AEGON THE USURPER and VITELLIUS

the man who lost everything for the throne/third of the year of four emperors

rulers whose reigns existed entirely within a civil war, they still managed to stand out on account of their pointless violence even for an extremely violent era. too cunning to be content, too cruel to loved, and too incompetent to be respected, ultimately their own followers became their downfall.

AEGON THE BROKEN KING and VALENTINIAN THE SECOND

dragonsbane/the caged bird

¿what other word can you use for them besides puppet? maybe sorrowful. elevated at a young age and talked over by their advisors, they lived isolated lives and died lonely deaths (possibly the result of what little agency they were granted in their lives). their lives can also be seen as the end of an era of greatness that had once defined their nation (the death of the dragons and the rise of the puppet emperors).

DAERON THE YOUNG DRAGON and JULIAN THE APOSTATE

would-be great conqueror/would-be great reformer

after unexpectedly proving their competence in battle, these men's promising starts to their reigns were cut off by a surprise attack. one of the great what-ifs of history, the legacy that they wound up stuck with was "won some fights before starting a pointless war then left us up shit's creek with no paddle".

BAELOR THE MOST BELOVED and THEODOSIUS THE GREAT

the blessed king/the last ruler of a united empire

two monarchs with a surprisingly high-quality reputation despite all the cruelty and religious zealotry they wound up participating in. their impulses overrode commitment to their duties and common sense at key moments, leaving their nations worse for the wear, yet they remain beloved.

VISERYS THE SECOND and CLAUDIUS THE FIRST

the hand of the king who bore the weight of the crown/the conqueror elevated from behind a curtain

both men who were never particularly well-liked, they found success after being elevated at a surprisingly old age after a life of surviving their predecessor's bizarre excesses. they were both scholarly and very likely disabled (viserys with a spine condition and claudius with something like cerebral palsy).

AEGON THE UNWORTHY and HONORIUS

a vacuum of excess/the emperor more interested in chickens than the sack of his city

two pathetic excuses for a head of state, offering less help than a screaming toddler in a dirty diaper during an era when the people really needed not that. the only thing worse than their constant lack of action was the astoundingly terrible decisions that they did manage to make. two morons so useless that nobody even bothered to assassinate them.

DAERON THE FALSEBORN and HADRIAN

the good bastard/the bloodthirsty peacemaker

a pair of rulers who were unconventional for their era, disappointing many of their peers by sorting out several crises peacefully and introducing much-needed reforms to the state that undoubtedly preserved it. this didn't stop them from coming down hard on rebels, with their foreign policy defining conflict for centuries to come. although their rise to power was of dubious legitimacy, both are generally considered quite good at their jobs, even if many of their peers hated their obsession with a foreign culture (dorn and greece). they also both died of illness.

AERYS THE FIRST and HOSTILIAN

two idiots who accomplished basically nothing and then died.

MAEKAR and DOMITIAN

the anvil of summerhall/the damnatio memoria'd

the unfavorite sons who were never expected to take on the throne, they still rose to the occasion and proved themselves to be competent, even if they were never good at gaining the respect of others or predicting other people's moves. military men at heart, they were passed up for a promotion often enough that the fact that they didn't do as much murder as expected is surprising.

AERYS THE MAD KING and CALIGULA

he who would burn his own kingdom to ash/the conqueror of neptune