Few national Democrats have pushed back as forcefully against Trumpβs authoritarian crackdown. Thereβs a reason for that.
Tim Murphy at Mother Jones:
In the lateΒ 1970s, after building a small airport hotel into one of the biggest names in hospitality, the Pritzkers of ChicagoΒ joined forcesΒ with an ambitious young developer to convert an unfashionable hotel on New Yorkβs 42nd Street into a sparkling Grand Hyatt. The building would have five restaurants, a signature atrium, and evenβif the city would allow itβa casino. The project was a success, but the relationship went bust. The developerΒ accusedΒ the family of βfraud, extortion, and money launderingβ and sued them for $500 million (before eventually settling). The Pritzkers accused Donald Trump of simply being himself. βIf you want to see what kind of partner Mr. Trump is,βΒ said Jay Pritzker, the hotel chainβs co-founder, βread his book.β If you want to understand the Pritzkers, you should start by reading theirs. The book that Jayβs nephew JB says changed his life is calledΒ Three Score After Ten. It was written by his great-grandfather, Nicholas Pritzker; privately printed in 1941; and distributed to his descendants as they came of age. The two-term Democratic governor of Illinois, whose father, Donald Pritzker, died of a heart attack when JB was 7, received the first of his three copies at his bar mitzvah from his grandfather, AN. He estimates he has βread it at least five or seven times.β Three ScoreΒ is a rags-to-riches memoir bookended by authoritarianism. While Nicholas is the narrator, the familyβs destiny is set by his brother, Abram, a βhigh temperedβ student who is arrested in 1880 by the tsarist police and charged with treason for distributing βuncensored printed pamphletsβ in Kyiv. After heβs sentenced to exile in Siberia, his mother gets him releasedβbut pogroms sweep the city, and the family has to flee. Abram, traveling without a passport, escapes with the help of smugglers, but loses his possessions to βthe border patrol.β They finally make it to the Midwest, with the help of benevolent American Jews.
Nicholas arrives with almost nothing but eventually passes the bar exam and starts the firm that will bind together aΒ $15 billion networkΒ of companies with holdings in everything from hotels to furniture and snuff tobacco. But Nicholas rejects the myth of rugged individualism. He is lifted at every step by helping hands and tells his heirs they have a duty to support βpoverty-stricken immigrants.β
Three ScoreΒ is a hard book to find. JB once said it is βnot on the bookshelves anywhere.β But a family that has donatedΒ dinosaur bones,Β surrealist art, andΒ hundreds of millions of dollarsΒ to institutions around the country canβt be expected to keep every copy for itself. When I mentioned, during an interview in December, that I had recently discovered one at the Yale Center for British Art, the governor raised his eyebrows with a look of genuine surprise.
[...] Pritzker had come to the West Side on a snow-covered Tuesday to sign into law new protections against what he called the βdepravityβ of Trumpβs mass deportation regime. For months, masked federal agents had swarmed Latino neighborhoods like this one, snatching residents off the streets and terrorizing citizens and noncitizens. They attacked protesters,Β ransacked homes, sprayed tear gasΒ near schools, rappelledΒ into an apartment building, and shot a 30-year-old womanΒ five timesΒ for the crime of honking her horn. If Trump 2.0 has often felt like a protracted siege on American democracy, βOperation Midway Blitzβ wasΒ its forward line, in which heavily armed men, coked up on memes, tested the defenses of civil society.
Illinois responded with defiance. Pritzker fought Trumpβs plan to turn Chicago into a military βtraining groundβ and hailed the residents who organized their communities and followed agents with whistles and smartphones. Speaking in the auditorium of the church a few minutes before we met, Pritzker announced that day cares, schools, hospitals, and courts would be required to safeguard personal information and develop plans for dealing with immigration raids, and residents would be empowered to sue federal agents. βWeβre sending a message to Donald Trump, to Kristi Noem, to Gregory Bovino, and anyone else seeking to terrorize our people,β he said. βYour divisiveness and your brutality are not welcome here.β
In a year when elite institutions teetered and caved, and some Democrats seemed more interested in fighting the last war than defending their backyards, Pritzker seized the floor as one of the presidentβs fiercest antagonistsβa blue-state governor who stood up to the regime and demanded justice for its victims. βItβs time to fight everywhere, and all at once,βΒ he declaredΒ at a dinner in New Hampshire last spring, while slamming βdo-nothing Democratsβ in DC. In October,Β he toldΒ a group of teachers that βDonald Trump and his cronies can fuck all the way off.β In some respects, Pritzker makes an awkward champion for a Democratic Party looking for a new direction. He is a billionaire in an electorateΒ raging against oligarchyΒ and a former AIPAC supporter at a time when support for Israel is plummeting. (A spokesperson for the governor said Pritzker had not donated to the group in βnearly a decadeβ and βbelieves the organization has abandoned its bipartisan principles and become a pro-Trump organization.β) The pugilist who now castigates βhedge fund managers and tech brosβ was a Facebook-investing venture capitalist. If youβre looking ahead to 2028βwhich, New Hampshire dinner notwithstanding, aides insist he is notβit is possible to imagine a future campaign crashing against the reefs of his familyβs offshore trusts.
But it is impossible to separate Pritzkerβs contemptuous response to Trump from the path he took to office. The desire to wield his advantages without being reduced to a caricature of them has been the central tension of his career. The family name opened doors and helped him weather setbacks that might have sunk a poorer candidate. It allowed him to spend more than $300 million on political campaigns since Trumpβs first election and acquire a unique duality of influenceβpart officeholder, part megadonor. His backgroundβand how he makes sense of itβalso helps explain why, at a moment of upper-class capitulation, he resisted so viscerally when so many others sued for peace.Β Three ScoreΒ is a story, in part, about what is owed. Pritzker would probably never have made it this far if he wasnβt a Pritzker. But if it werenβt for his family, he might never have wanted to. [...]
Pritzker waitedΒ nearlyΒ two decades to run again. In the interregnum, he set out to make a name for himself. Despite Trumpβs assertion that Pritzkerβs family βthrew him out of the business,β JB was never centrally involved. Around 2000, after Uncle Jay passed away and Uncle Bob ceded control of the family companies to Penny and two cousins, another group of cousins, including JB,Β pushed to divide the fortune. After some contentious wrangling, theyΒ reached a dealΒ in which AN Pritzkerβs 10 grandkids (including JB) would get about $1.4 billion each. The problem was that AN had 12 grandkids. Bobβs children from an acrimonious second marriage were treated, because of the age gap, as ANβs great-grandchildren. When they found out, they sued for billions.
Pritzker v. PritzkerΒ offered a rare look inside a family that had, per AN, steered clear of βpublic business.β Plaintiffs and defendantsβsome represented by future Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuchβsparred over not just the value of their inheritance, but its purpose. If Nicholasβ memoir instilled a noblesse oblige, the family foundation and network of trusts provided the architecture. AN βbelieved that it is an integral part of the Pritzker family way of life that they constantly increase the scope of their charitable contributions,β one judge wrote, in an opinion from an earlier case that was entered into the record. But AN also believed that charity had tangible benefitsβbig donations, like the construction of a hospital, helped the Pritzkers close big deals. The court filings also highlighted the lengths to which the βtax consciousβ AN went to shield the family money. When he died in 1986, his estate claimed that the head of one of Americaβs richest companies had been worth just $25,000. The IRS sued for $53 million butΒ eventually settledΒ for $9.5 million plus interest. Where did it all go? In court filings, the excluded grandkidsβwho eventually settled for $500 million apieceβdetailed a maze of trusts in the Bahamas. According toΒ an estimate byΒ Forbes, the family held $3 billion offshore.
A spokesperson stated that Pritzker (who put his assets into a blind trust after being elected) βhas never taken a disbursement from any offshore trust and has directed that any disbursements be given to charity.β That was also the governorβs line in a 2018 primary against a Kennedy (RFK Jr.βs brother Chris,Β who also hadΒ an offshore account) and in a general election against Gov. Bruce Rauner (a private equity mogul who also had offshore accounts). But to fully accept the premise, youβd have to disregard ANβs insight about philanthropy: Itβs not just the recipients who gain from it.
[...]
When PritzkerΒ ranΒ for office again, in 2018, opponents once more accused him of attempting to buy the race (he spent more than $170 million) and flogged aΒ Chicago TribuneΒ investigationβbased on records from the Paradise Papersβinto his use of offshore companies for, among other things, a duck-boat tourism venture. Republicans made light of an incident in which the Pritzkers hadΒ removed all the toiletsΒ from the empty mansion they owned next to their actual mansion, and then had the building reassessed as uninhabitableβsaving big on their taxes. (Pritzker said he βfollowed the rules,β but paid back $330,000.) It was all a bit Mitt Romney. But Pritzker could (and did) talk about building a Holocaust museum, funding early childhood education initiatives, and launching a tech incubator that powered hundreds of local startups.
In the first campaign, βthere just wasnβt much [of a] there there,β said Peter Giangreco, a Chicago political consultant who worked for Schakowsky in that race. βThe difference between him running for Congress in β98 and running for governor in 2018 was thereβs just a tremendous body of work.β Pritzkerβs most serious hurdle involved his relationship with Blagojevich. After the 2008 election, as the governor was attempting to sell Barack Obamaβs vacated Senate seat, Pritzker was recorded on a wiretap discussing the viability of various Black Democrats (he describes one potential pick as the βleast offensiveβ) while pitching himself for state treasurer. The transcripts, which theΒ TribuneΒ published in 2018, offered an unflattering picture of a would-be politico bantering with a crook in search of patronage. (Pritzker has apologized for his comments about the Black politicians and said he wasΒ not his βbest self.β)
The election, though, was ultimately a referendum on Rauner, who failed to pass a budget for two years in an impasse with Democratic legislators. The stateΒ owed $16 billionΒ at one point, and basic services were being cut off. Pritzker has analogized the budget crisis to DOGE; his tenure has amounted to a cleanup job. By recent metrics, Pritzker has been a clear success. He has not gone to prison, and the stateβs finances stabilized, though Illinois is again in a budget crunch thanks in part to Trumpβs cuts. With Democratic supermajorities in the legislature, he raised the minimum wage to $15, slashed medical debt, legalized marijuana, expanded abortion rights, capped the price of insulin, and banned right-to-work regulations. His tenure has been defined both by an ambitious agenda and by the huge sums of money heβs spent to get what he wants. In one of his first big fights, he personally spent $56.5 million to sell a ballot initiative to raise taxes on millionaires. Griffin, the Trump-backing hedge funder, spent $54 million and defeated it. But the cash kept coming. Ahead of his reelection in 2022, Pritzker spent $24 million to elevate Darren Bailey, a conservative he considered more beatable, over a moderate Republican backed by $50 million from Griffin. (Pritzker spent another $152 million in the general election anyway.) That year, he was also the first- and second-biggest donor to two state Supreme Court justicesβa feat he achieved by donating half a million apiece from his campaign account and a personal trust,Β circumventingΒ a law he had signed capping βindividualβ donations. All of this spending, and the policy wins that have come with it, has produced an unusual cult following. Pritzker has inspired a tongue-in-cheek X account calledΒ Socialists For Pritzker. Progressives on Bluesky sometimes call him βthe Great Khan.β His image has been softened by the fact that he does not come off as the sort of billionaire who uses peasants as chess pawnsβhe is a big guy, you may have noticed, and a nerd. When I asked a former aide what Pritzker does for fun, she replied, very specifically, βLiberty puzzlesββreferring to the purveyor of high-end wooden jigsaws. In Springfield, he has hosted bipartisan game nights for legislators.
Mother Jones has an excellent story on Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) and his key role in fighting the Trump Regimeβs authoritarian crackdown.
















