#blockquote.

h2 Text Looks like this / bold / italic / bold & italic / italic & bold / strike / link

regular text, bold, italic, bold & italic, italic & bold, strike, link

small text, bold, italic, bold & italic, italic & bold, strike, link

and you’ve got the sup text looking like this and sub text looking like this

regular blockquote text, bold, italic, bold & italic, italic & bold, strike, link

small blockquote text, bold, italic, bold & italic, italic & bold, strike, link

for example

an unordered list

looks like this

for curiosity’s sake , what does this look like when it’s bigger and longer and does more for idk ... existing ??? lmao just like

if its longer does it do what i want it to ? does it lOOK THE WAY I WANT IT TO ??? that is the real damn question now isnt it??

and if you were wondering

an ordered list

looks like this

for curiosity’s sake , what does this look like when it’s bigger and longer and does more for idk ... existing ??? lmao just like

if its longer does it do what i want it to ? does it lOOK THE WAY I WANT IT TO ??? that is the real damn question now isnt it??

preformatted text looks like this, gotta check to see what it does when there are no line breaks but the text keeps going and going because ! you know ! importance !

who knows ? likely this actor, that actor, this actor, this actor, this actor, and especially that actor ! i’m not actually naming names because of things, but you get the picture this way, right ?

yeah, you can’t really style asks anymore but this is what you can do ? this is a response that’s pretty normal in length ( even if not in relation to the question at hand )

an inducted muse —

« fc • gender + pronouns »     FIRST LAST was invited into the loyal order of the red diamond in MONTH of YEAR. they were a prospective member for AMOUNT OF TIME before they were inducted AMOUNT OF TIME ago, on MONTH DAY. they are AGE years old, but appear AGE. they ARE /NOT a legacy to the order. — alias / age , tz , pronouns.

« sofia carson • cis female + she/her/hers »     CECELIA MUNROE was invited into the loyal order of the red diamond in APRIL of 1954. they were a prospective member for SIX YEARS before they were inducted FORTY YEARS ago, on 3 NOVEMBER. they are NINETY years old, but appear TWENTY-FOUR. they ARE a legacy to the order. — casey / 27 , pst , she/he/they.

a prospective muse —

« fc • gender + pronouns »     FIRST LAST first heard of the loyal order of the red diamond in MONTH of YEAR. they’ve been a prospective member since the DAY/suffix of MONTH, when they got invited AMOUNT OF TIME ago. they’re currently AGE years old, but i heard they plan to appear AGE after being inducted. they ARE /NOT a legacy to the order. — alias / age , tz , pronouns.

please give a like once you have read this post ! thanks !