Baldur's gate companions + incorrect quotes
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Australia

seen from Ireland

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Nepal
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
Baldur's gate companions + incorrect quotes

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Bhaalspawn
I-1 - E 79 between Blagoevgrad and Dupnica, Kyustendil Province, Bulgaria by Petar Sabev
jaheira/khalid save meeee

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Double Standards
There are two parallel situations Iâve been thinking about for quite some time: the two babygates and solo Harry vs. solo Zayn. * **Â
BabygatesÂ
***Â I find it so interesting that the same people who ripped apart all the inconsistencies with bg 1 are those who look at bg 2 and are like, yep, sounds plausible to me.
Both babygates follow the exact same formula of either The Sun or Dailymail revealing the exclusive relationship, a way too early pregnancy announcement, a father that is seemingly detached from it, and none of the band members participating in it.Â
The only difference is in one, you have a fame hungry family and a faked pregnancy. In the other, you have a fame hungry woman and a real pregnancy. In fact, the formula of a fake relationship between Cheryl and Liam was so obvious that everyone mocked it. No one believed it. But suddenly, the minute we figured out Cheryl was actually pregnant, people were like, oh, I guess that means Liamâs the father.
What??
What??
And this is where the double standards set in.
In Louisâ situation, I read numerous times how, âLouis is a 24 yr, famous artist, in the biggest band, just about to start his solo career. There would be no way that heâd risk all of that to have a kid.â
But, what? Liam would? Liam, who actually has solo music coming (at the time of bg 1, Louis didnât have solo plans) is going to be promoting his music, touring, focusing on his career - he would risk all of that to have a kid? A kid heâs apparently very committed to, but at the same time wonât even be around given the promotion of his solo career.
Letâs also not forget that Liam and Cheryl had been âdatingâ for a few months when the pregnancy rumours started swirling. Liam who had just gotten out of a âlong term relationshipâ just jumped into another with a woman multiple years older, and not be married, no actual commitment, but be like cool, yeah, letâs have a kid.
In fact, if you look at the situations, the story that Louis had a one night stand and got a random pregnant, is actually more plausible than Liam dating Cheryl for a few months and deciding to father her child and commit his life to her.
So, it begs the question, why does the fandom believe that Louis would be too smart to get himself in such a situation, but Liam wouldnât?
(Also the fact that Briana clearly wasnât pregnant, yet Cheryl clearly was â that doesnât count as a reason to believe bg 2. Because IVF is a thing.)
 Solo Harry vs. Solo Zayn
This one has been irking me for a long time. In fact, ever since Harry outright said that he was the one who came up with the hiatus in 2014, yet for some random reason, Zayn was the one who left first?
Iâve seen a lot of people using solo Harry promo as evidence that look he LOVES One Direction. He dedicated an entire segment of his movie to the boys. He talks to his boys all the time. Heâs a true 1D stan.
Yes, Iâm aware that a lot of this is in retaliation to the perpetual rumours that Harry hated being in the band. But itâs interesting that the smallest examples of 1D love are raised as gospel.
Where as for Zayn:
A wall in his house:
So why the discrepancy?
(I know that the Twitter fight between Zouis and the #realmusic left a horrible taste in everyoneâs mouth. I also know at that time (when I actually wasnât privy to the I heart Zayn side of the fandom), I had laughed at all of it and been like, lawls, they expect us to believe this twitter fight? They expect us to believe that Zaynâs actually tweeting that shit?
Imagine my surprise when, oh hey, people actually believed it!
Isnât it interesting that we shouldnât believe everything that print Harry says? Isnât it interesting that we shouldnât believe everything that SM Louis says/ does? Isnât it interesting that we should believe that the boys are in some ridiculous contract that would create a fake baby and fake relationships? That this contract is so ruthless that they wouldnât let Niall take time off his knee surgery, didnât care how they were working underage boys to the ground, all in hopes of some money.
But wait.
How come people do believe the shit that print Zayn says? How come people do believe the shit that Zayn tweets? How come people do think that this contract and big, bad, Simon Cowell suddenly grew a heart when he looked at Zayn and realised he was unhappy making music?
Like, oh poor Harry and Louis they want to be together, but if they do, my profits will go down so I will force them apart. Poor Niall, he needs some time to fix his knee, but if he does, that means cancelled shows, my profits will go down, so I wonât let him get the proper medical attention he needs. Poor boys, theyâre so tired, they barely sleep, theyâre constantly working, but if I allow them to rest, my profits will go down, so Iâll force them to keep going. Oh poor Zayn, this music is definitely not what he likes, Iâve already forced him into four albums, and if he leaves, heâs sure to take a chunk of the Asian market, so my profits will go down***, so Iâll force him to â oh actually, never mind. Iâll actually let him leave.
Iâm sorry, what? Do people actually look at these situations and go, yeah that makes complete sense??)
I find this interesting because there are so many times when Zayn and Harry have said the exact same thing, how they are making music that is truly theirs, how theyâre finally getting to the sound that they want to listen to. Yet one is praised for staying true to himself (despite some controversial songs) and the other is despised for making music he enjoys.
What was the point of this? To say that it doesnât matter if one of the boys arenât your faves. You donât have to love Liam as much as you love Louis. You donât have to love, heck, even tolerate Zayn as much as you tolerate Harry. But you should at least extend the same level of analysis and critical thinking to the band as a whole.
When you are quick to judge other people for believing a het!Harry narrative, or a Harry hates 1D narrative, or a het!dad!Louis narrative, and tell them to look at the facts, think critically, think logically, use your goddman brain, yet refuse to do the same for other members â Iâm sorry but your double standards are showing.
*This is mainly the discrepancies in how people perceive each situation. I donât know if itâs because some people either just donât want to look into things enough, or if they genuinely believe one situation over the other. Or that people just donât care enough about Liam and Zayn.
**This isnât referring to people who believe everything 1DHQ says, hook, line, and sinker. At least theyâre extending their beliefs equally across all boys. This is referring to those who pride themselves as being analytical and seeing the truth about certain situations, but refuse to apply that same level of thinking to others. Itâs about those people who only look at certain situations and then believe 1DHQ narrative for others.
***I am intentionally ignoring the boysâ sexuality when discussing this, because I read multiple times that you donât need to know Louisâ sexuality to dispel bg. So Iâm going with that.
****A quick Google search shows that Four performed better than MITAM did. Â
Baldur's gate companions + incorrect quotes
I was thinking about that one quote from Tamoko about Sarevok "I would save the man within the beast he wishes to be" and something struck when I remembered his armor design.
It's all horns and spikes and pointy teeth and black and all you need for the scary villain armor. The first thought would be that the armor is supposed to make him look dangerous, but look closer at the helmet. It's designed so Sarevok's face is framed by the helmet's teeth, like a maw that's swallowing him. I really like it, because the first impression you get from the design is that he's a dangerous enemy and that's what Sarevok wants to show, but the second impression you get is that he's not as in control as he thinks. The armor is taking over, the beast is devouring him. When Sarevok dies, his body turns to dust, but the armor stays, leaving him entirely consumed, the taint having won over him. In ToB, on his portrait, Sarevok has a golden armor, and while there were plans for cut content involving restoring the sword of chaos to return it to him, there was never anything for the armor. The armor was the beast he tried be, the beast that ended up devouring him instead.
I just really like the predatory aspect of the armor, and how it can be threatening both for those faced with it but also for the one wearing it.