I got a flood question (sorry for everything thats going on 🫶). So I know flood also came a little bit from the deaging au you had written a little bit of, but I was wondering if there were any other thoughts about making specifically Nat/Steve/Tony teenagers/young adults as opposed to adults like the rest of the team/victors?
So one of the things going on here is not necessarily that Natasha, Steve, and Tony got aged down but that everyone else got aged up -- you can actually see a bit of this in the original concept and even in the first chapter (where Peggy and Pierce are talking), since I didn't settle on Bruce and Clint being significantly older than Natasha, Steve, Tony, and Thor until well into the second chapter. Originally they were all meant to be within about ten years of each other. (For the record: Steve and Natasha are seventeen, Tony is eighteen, Thor is twenty-one, Bruce is thirty-three, and Clint is thirty-nine.)
Part of it is that THG is, by definition, a YA franchise -- if I aged Natasha and Steve (and Tony and Thor and Howard and Peggy) up, then either they are further away from their own Games or I have to change the fundamental conceit of the Hunger Games themselves to no longer be about the child murder death olympics, which, then, why am I even writing a THG crossover.
I don't want them further away from their own Games; Natasha is almost five years out from her Games because she won her Games at age twelve. Steve is less than a year out from his Games because it's crucial to his experience with the Games in general that the Games after his hadn't happened when he was kidnapped; he has a really set idea of what the Hunger Games are and he doesn't see how it changes after him. I also wanted to keep Steve and Natasha with the same age difference as they have in canon, which is nothing except for the icebox years. depending on what year you have (canon) Steve coming out of the ice, he and Natasha are both the same age (twenty-seven in The Avengers, since Natasha's birthday is in December). also because they are the romantic couple here, it is easier to have them the same age. (I do go back and forth on whether or not I should have made them eighteen, though this actually goes back to an original misconception of mine about the reaping age span and by the time I'd figured that out it was too late.)
Tony should not have been in the Hunger Games not because of his age, but because of his status and his class; his age is not a discrepant factor here, he's the same age as several of the actual tributes in his Games. also one of Tony Stark's core conceits as a Marvel character is that he will always be beefing with Steve and it's much weirder to have a forty-year-old man beefing with a seventeen-year-old than to have an eighteen-year-old beefing with a seventeen-year-old. also, if I make him any older? he's not a minor anymore. he has to be a minor (age of majority in Panem is nineteen) because otherwise he's not in school and he has control of Stark Industries and the Stark fortune. he has to not have either of those yet for plot reasons.
Thor is twenty-one because his trauma surrounding the Games and his family are both very recent; his presence here does not work if it's older. he's got a pretty similar background to his canon background (at least insofar as the arc goes), which would not work for an older character who has had time to come to terms with this and what happened to Loki. It has to still be pretty fresh for him the way it is in MCU canon ca. The Avengers. which means he has to be one of the younger Victors.
so the question isn't really about the younger characters. it's about the older characters -- why age up Clint and Bruce from young adults? one, I thought it would be interesting to actually keep the age difference between Clint and Natasha from MCU canon, because it really does affect their dynamic and how you read them. (if I'm doing my math correctly for Flood, they have a 23-year age difference vs. canon's 13-year age difference, which is also the Renner-ScarJo age difference, 1971 and 1984.) it also means I can put Clint directly into the Haymitch "winner of the 2nd Quarter Quell" role. Clint is however much more stable than Haymitch for various reasons. (fun fact: Clint is actually married in this 'verse too.)
Bruce -- I went back and forth a lot on how much older or younger he should be than the others and finally gave him the 60th Games; he's an adult, he got the Captain America anniversary Games, he also had a full ten years in the Capitol prior to Natasha showing up.
the other reason goes back to the core conceit of the Hunger Games themselves: you get one winner every year between the ages of 12 and 18. that means that barring some funky stuff, none of these people are going to be the same age. I could have made them the Victors of the last five Hunger Games. that completely changes the dynamics between them, their experience of the Games and the Capitol, and their relationship with the other Victors and the Gamemakers. it also does not make sense for the THG worldbuilding, where there are going to be seventy-four years' worth of Victors, and only these five are the ones who live here? there had to be an actual reason for that.
also, because of the conceit of Catching Fire and the 75th Hunger Games, the 3rd Quarter Quell, pulling its tribute from the Victor pool, it works much better to spread the main characters out across the last twenty-five years of the Games. (The reason why and the actual process of the Quarter Quell Reaping is significantly different in this fic than in CF, because Alexander Pierce is not Coriolanus Snow and this Panem's problems are different than CF Panem's due to the 74th Games here going basically the exact opposite than in canon). I knew I would be pulling in MCU characters from outside the OG6 to fill out the rest of the Victor pool and because they're all different ages too, by spreading them out it means I can figure out the different dynamics between them, the different events that happened around and between their Games, all of that fun stuff that becomes significantly more difficult than if they're all within a ten-year age range from the last five Games. also why are they in the Tower and no one else? there are specific reasons for each of them! like I could have just gone "these are the winners from the last five years, they are required to live in the Capitol," but that's boring.
but at its core the reason that the younger characters here (Steve, Natasha, Tony, Peggy, Howard, and Thor) are older teens or young adults is because this a THG story and the main characters are older teens or young adults. it would have been weirder to age them up!