hi! i love how you write a/b/o and i was thinking about dynamics and would love your thoughts on it.
i was trying to distinguish the general traits of each designation, but i feel like the more i dig into it, the harder it is to differentiate between alpha and omega for certain traits beyond basic dominance and submission. like being protective.
how do you generally assign traits when you write?
Hi! Thank you.
For me, it's not so much about giving them traits as it is about emphasizing certain things.
The thing about the omegaverse is that it is built up from the ideas of that wolf study (that's been debunked) about how alphas are the dominate leader of the pack, and omegas are effectively the runt of the litters and therefore at the bottom of the pack. Which is probably why when you went digging "alphas are dominate and omegas are submissive" is all you found, because at it's core that's all it is. The other important thing about omegaverse, is---as I understand it---that the omegaverse AU was a way to give men women's problems. Example from F1: discrimination in the workplace; women can't drive turns into omegas can't drive. And think about it: omegas can get pregnant and give birth. If they give birth then they will have maternal instincts, and if they mate with an alpha that alpha become the father and paternal instincts. Thus, I would argue that "alpha traits" would be that of a 50s husband, and "omega traits" are that of a 50s wife. 50s, being the 1950s American Dream Nuclear Family. And if we know anything about that dynamic: (say it with me now) dominance and submission!
As we well know, those gender ideals are simply that: ideals, culture, not genetic predispositions, and people are just people.
So I make them people.
And from there it's all about framing. It's society and culture that makes "being an omega" mean anything. Like, think about the courting aspect of the omegaverse: is not that just historical romance plot points? The man (alpha) gives gifts to the woman (omega) is hopes that she'll return his affections?
And so, like, in MNTR, I don't really deal with those problems. It's mostly just alpha = paternal and omega = maternal in the way I go about framing "taking care of the family."
I think. I don't actually think all that much when I write peeps as their omegaverse designations. Like, it's just a state of the universe: that's what they are, and they are people.

















