seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from China

seen from Estonia
seen from Sweden
seen from Thailand
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I feel like I pissed this person off. I really wasn't trying to. I just felt like their definition conflated restoration with conservation and it did not answer the spirit of the original question.
These terms are actually still debated among people in conservation fields. It can get a lot more nuanced.
Because there is Conservation—the philosophy, the ethos, the field of study, the ethical framework.
And there is conservation—the physical act.
The main debate has to do with ethical conservation. Some argue that conservation sometimes goes too far—prioritizing display value over historical integrity. Others dislike restoration altogether, feeling that it erases an artifact’s history just to make it pretty again.
But then restorationists will argue that all of their work is easily reversible and showing an object as it was, has historical value.
I feel lucky that my photo restoration work is done with a digital copy and I don't have to worry about changing the original object. But when you are deailing with physical objects, things get a lot more complicated.
So, to clarify my clarifications...
Conservation is an umbrella philosophy that can include acts like preservation, conservation, and restoration. It is an ongoing effort to determine best practices for historical items.
Preservation is usually reserved for really old stuff that is so delicate, the best thing you can do is freeze it in time. The Mona Lisa is preserved. Could they restore her eyebrows? Maybe. But it just isn't worth the risk.
One of my favorite preservation videos is probably of Michelangelo’s Epifania Cartoon.
This is a conservation treatment meant to stop degradation and preserve the item in its current state.
So it is Conservation, conservation, and preservation.
That's not confusing at all, right?
The physical act of conservation is typically preparing an artifact for educational display in a museum laboratory. You want to represent it well enough to give people an idea of its original state. You want to stabilize the item and give it a good chance of not degrading further, but you don't want to make huge alterations.
Different labs have different standards and usually assess the items on a case-by-case basis. So if there is a painting that has fold lines, they may flatten it. If the original frame is damaged, they may repair it. If the varnish doesn't block UV, they may remove it and use more modern varnish. And if the item can be fully or partially restored with 100% reversible techniques, some labs are okay pushing the conservation that far. But the historical concerns of the item are prioritized above all else.
Adam Savage has a series of videos with the National Parks Service conservation lab. This is a great video on how they were able to improve the display quality of some of Thomas Edison's chairs without permanently altering them.
Full "like new" restorations are usually done to privately owned artifacts. Good restorationists will do their best to be as "conservation-y" as possible, but their priorities are to create a mint condition aesthetic. It's typically up to their client how far they go and if they are allowed to use irreversible methods to get a good result.
Here is a video of a museum grade conservation and restoration...
And here is an example of a private restoration for a client.
Both use scalpals, but one restoration was a lot more... scrape-y.
Julian's techniques are "conservation-ish" but he does not have the conservative handcuffs of a museum lab. Nor does he have a science department to consult with.
Personally, I enjoy both approaches to restoration. I like how delicate and intricate museum conservation can be. But I also love seeing what stuff actually looked like when it was first created. I think there is space for both methods in an ethical framework. But I can also see why a museum conservator might get a twitchy eye when they see Julian going to town on a 200-year-old painting with a razor sharp scalpel.
Fourth Cone, featured in the Reddit post, almost exclusively uses reversible techniques. They use colored pencils and special paints that can be easily undone. So I think it is possible to be an ethical restorationist. But you're probably still going to get judgy looks from museum folks.
I really enjoyed their massive restoration of a vintage Superman poster.
Lab focused semester
The thing I love about art conservation and restoration is how interdisciplinary it is - no matter which profession I talk to, I will always find a common topic
So, how about i will show you what i was doing in university this semester? So you will understand why i have drawen so few drawing in this year... (Of course there are also the fact that i started watching cdramas in my free time, instead of drawing, but i hope we will overlook this fact...)•-•
First, warning! Really bad english, im studying in another language, so I don't know what to call any process in english, and i ll try to explain how it works, but if something is unclear, you can always ask •^•
Packing in the big pastel
It's always a sad day when I have to pack in a pastel. Even if you spray fixative on your work to seal the pastel surface--and I don't, because that often flattens/darkens the colors--the work, being fragile, has to be framed or packed away eventually. And framing a pastel is really expensive.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Italian restorers have used laser beams to clean an ancient Roman marble column in the piazza outside the prime minister’s office, removing
Perched above rooftops in the heart of Rome, restorers on Thursday used laser beams to clean a marble column in the piazza outside the prime
In addition to debuting the short-pulse lasers, the group of 18 restorers use chemical wraps, sponges and resin to erase dirt from the smog in the Italian capital and fill holes created by water freezing in cold weather and expanding within. The monument has also suffered from erosion that has erased some of the faces of the engraved figures.
This Thursday! Conservation Close-up
Join us on the 6th floor of Hatcher this Thursday, 19 March, between 4-6p for our next Third Thursdays at the Library event of the semester! This open house will feature conservation work.
Come chat with the conservators and technicians who care for the library’s rare and special collections. The Preservation Services department is charged with caring for vast and diverse collections — from the world’s first atlas to (fake) blood-stained movie costumes.
Projects on view will include structural repairs of bindings, complex paper washing, intricate custom boxes, and a large scale rehousing project. Some examples of projects involving technical analysis and multi-band imaging will also be presented.
While you’re here, pick up a Third Thursdays Passport and collect a stamp! Make it around to all four Third Thursday Open Houses — the Clark Library, International Studies, Asia Library, and the Special Collections Research Center — and win a prize!