I wish it wasnāt a hot take that a story in which two characters of any gender prioritize their purely platonic relationship over any other romantic or sexual interests they might have is a textually queer story
seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
I wish it wasnāt a hot take that a story in which two characters of any gender prioritize their purely platonic relationship over any other romantic or sexual interests they might have is a textually queer story

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
look, it's really not that complex. romance in fiction is like aliens and magic and faster-than-light space travel in fiction. it's fun to read about, but when you think about it too much you realize it's a good thing it doesn't actually exist. i mean, can you imagine? romance, in the real world? thank god it's fictional, that'd be horrifying. hold on one second *assistant whispers something in my ear* my friends, i have grave and terrible news
IT IS TIME FOR THE POWER OF AROMANTICISM TO MAKE ARO TAGS BECOME #1 ON TUMBLR YET AGAIN
Random thing. Iām very annoyed when pride merch is sold irl or online and like also picrews have so many multisexual options (and no general one that can be an umbrella term/flag) yet no aro option. Barely ace. If they do include aro, itās always aroace. Also no polyam and barely any intersex. Itās like this werid way of portraying thay queerness is focused about just liking the same gender as you and transitioning in a certin way. Not about queering your life. In a fundamentally non societally acceptable way. Mind you there needs to be as much rep as possible for as many identities as possible. Iām just annoyed for the lack of aro stuff.
Itās funny because I was totally confident in being aroace, not wanting that kind of relationship with anyone when I younger and first discovered myself, so unabashed and free, and now I canāt help but sometimes wish I could fall in love, that someone would fall in love with me so I can fill the gaping maw in my heart that cries out to be loved.
I know romantic love isnāt the āhighest levelā of love, but I crave it, I think because I crave the idea that someone would love me and be so openly affectionate.
But I know I canāt fall in love and a romantic relationship in practice cannot happen and would not be truly desirable. Iām merely creating an unrealistic ideal of a romantic relationship.
Itās all so complicated

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Romance Object/Romantic objectification is a thing actually
This here is now in attendum to my one post where i ended up coming up with the concept of a "Romance Object" (basically a sex object, but applied to romance instead of sex).
It's such a weirdly common thing once you actually start to think about it, especially in amatonormative society. People fantasizing about their crushes, the tendency in most fandoms to romantically ship characters instead of platonically or otherwise, the very existence of the concept of a "dream partner" (prince or bride or otherwise) as an ideal to chase and lense to view potential partners through and measure up against. The willingness in extreme cases to also keep on persisting and pressuring another person with romantic gestures and so on.
And lastly also the perception and base assumption of simply being worth less for not acting perfectly like a romantic object. The patch up of that with "well, if they would've truly loved you, they wouldn't have done any of that" instead of literally just "woah, that was fucked up."
How every instance of two people, who happened to be able to fullfill each other's romantic desires and needs, gets picked out and shown around as an example of romance always being good and aspiring over the hundreds of couples where that just wasn't the case or didn't work out even with work put in.
How aromantic people have experiences of either getting pitied for their lack of romantic desire or not taken seriously when they are the object of romantic desire to someone. Or how often aromantic people get called cold hearted and emotionless, even manipulative for openly stating that they either just don't feel it or feel uncomfortable about receiving unwanted romantic attention.
And that's just the initial stuff I could think of here.
I am watching HeyRowanElisā video āThe āunbearable lonelinessā of aromanticismā and she quoted something from āRomantic Love is Killing usā by Caleb Lunaā āItās difficult to see it as anything other than a choice. To put it another way: those around me deprioritize our relationship for the sake of prioritizing their romantic and sexual one.ā And it just has me really thinking.
Firstly in that amatonormatism is just so wide spread and expected of others. When I assumed I was alloromantic, and saw other alloromantic get into relationships, there was this pressure that you Had to prioritize your romantic relationship over every other relationship in your life EVER. All of your friends, all of your family, your children, co-workers, every single person in your life (oftentimes including yourself) MUST take a back seat to your romantic and sexual partner. And itās ridiculous because I am also sure that most people donāt actually want that.
When I was in my toxic relationship, I was essentially expected to stop talking to all of my friends. Most of that was just due to the controlling nature of my ex but it was also the expectation from everyone else in my life too. People who werenāt negatively effect by the harmful nature of that relationship distanced, people who didnāt even know what he did to me and didnāt experience my negative outlash from being in that position still left and distanced. Everyone assumes youāre prioritizing them now and they react accordingly. I hated this, and so did many of my friends. But it was just the assumption.
Iām loosing track of my thoughts but my other thought is just thatā itās so expected yet literally no one I know actually wants that. So many people have expressed to me sadness and anger and lonliness when their other important friends got in a relationship and stopped talking to them, Iāve felt and seen other people experience the pain of the pressure to have to stop being as close to their friends as they once wereā stop talking, stop engaging, no more touching ever, no more sleeping over, no more intimate private conversations. You seemingly have to forfeit the depth of love for everyone else you have.
I have also had potential partners + people Iāve engaged in more-than-platonic behavior with get visibly weirded out when I prioritize my relationship with my friends. They see it as weird when I tell them there are things I will only tell and do with my friends, that I will never tell them. They get weird when I prioritize my friends over them. They get weird when they see that romance isnāt my priority. This goes even with relationships that itās been made clear itās only sexual/platonic but engaging in more actions that are seen as romantic.
Idk. Being aromantic is weird. And it sucks sometimes.
Often when aromantic people express a fear of loneliness after their friends partner up and have less time for them, people's solution is to encourage us to partner too, just platonically/queerplatonically. And that works for some, but it kind of misses the point. I don't want one person to spend most of my time with. I want several people who have the amount of time for me that single friends do. Not someone to live with, but someone to meet up with for a few hours on a fairly regular basis. Someone who'll be there for me in times of trouble (and vice versa), but isn't part of my major life decisions.
I know most alloromantic people aren't jerks who completely forget their friends when they get into relationships (I have friends who are married, and they haven't ditched me), but time is a finite resource, and someone else getting more of it inevitably means you get less. I don't blame my allo friends for that - it just isn't pleasant to experience.
The fact is that some people need to balance their emotional connection between multiple people, not concentrate most of it on just one. I'm a 'one or two eggs in each basket' kind of person (polyamorous people will know what I'm on about - we're fighting the same war on different fronts).
I mean, I'm not 100% sure that platonic partnership isn't for me. Maybe it'll appeal to me more later in life, maybe not. But it's annoying to have it presented to me as the ideal aro lifestyle. It feels like Amatonormativity Lite.