Generative design leverages computational power to simulate thousands of iterations in response to design parameters like energy use, structural integrity, or spatial flow. This efficiency pushes the boundaries of what architects can achieve. Yet, it raises the question: are we training architects to critically curate machine-generated designs or to deepen their role in crafting unique, human-centered environments? Could generative design reduce the risk of design redundancies, or does it risk producing repetitive algorithmic solutions when overused?