Why I Think the Rose (and the Entire Stained Glass Intro) from Beauty and the Beast is Unnecessary
For context, I just watched Beauty and the Beast (very good movie btw, nice 8/10 romance film), but I had some issues with it. These issues are mostly pretty nitpicky, but one of the big ones is how unnecessary the rose is.
For how much I see that rose in all the promotional material, how it's synonymous with Beauty and The Beast as a film, that rose, as well as most of the intro backstory, are completely irrelevant to the plot of Beauty and the Beast. The time limit, for example, doesn't give any actual urgency to Belle and the Beast's love. There are slight mentions of the rose starting to wilt, but the rose is nowhere near prominent enough to convince the audience Belle needs to immediately fall in love with the Beast.
As for the intro, my main issue is that NO ONE EVER TELLS BELLE ABOUT THE CURSE. Sure she figures out the castle's enchanted, but she never actually tells Belle about what happened! I thought that Chip would tell her something near the climax, but nope. Nothing. It's never mentioned in the slightest, and while that is good for most of the story, makes sure there isn't any pressure on Belle to fall in love with the Beast, I think she should have been told SOMETHING at least.
Most importantly though, it doesn't matter if Belle found out about the curse at the climax, because it wouldn't change anything about what she does! Which then begs the question, why the hell do we even need the intro! The Rose!
We don't, and I'll show how nothing is lost by cutting out the intro backstory and the rose. We start the movie at Belle going to the village, movie goes the same up until Belle sneaking to the West Wing. Here, Belle is caught messing with the Beast's human portrait, the Beast gets mad like he did at the rose, Belle runs away, movie continues as normal only without a rose, add in some more direct dialogue when Belle goes to save her dad about why Belle and the Beast needed to fall in love, notably , have the Beast say something like "I was cursed to be a beast, but your love saved me" after the big kiss, happy ending for all.
See how little removing the intro affects the plot. The only significant change I had to make was turning the rose into the Beast's old portrait, which I feel are similarly emotionally significant to the beast that you could swap them and have a similar reaction. Other than that, no major changes are done to the story, while adding in an interesting perspective/tonal change to the movie. Cutting out the intro helps place the audience in a similar position to everyone who meets the Beast, thinking he's a horrible monster and wondering what he's gonna do. This makes the Beast's change more significant, as we start to better understand and sympathize with the beast along with Belle. We ultimately get to a very similar emotional place by the climax of the movie as we do in the original, and then get hit hard by the mob going to storm the castle, as we understand where they were coming from but know better now. This angle, while not necessarily better, it would make the Beast a much harder sell to general audiences than some people already feel he is, but it would be pretty interesting and compelling, at least to me. By keeping the actual explanation vague, just that he was cursed into the form of a beast and only true mutual love can cure, and most importantly keeping the full reveal (hints can placed throughout the movie) till Belle leaves, we get a more mysterious tone for most of the movie, cut out unnecessary information that doesn't serve the story, while still maintaining the romance that is central to the story.

















