The problem is that because people usually have a profile picture that doesn't represent what they look like, it's automatically assumed that someone is neurotypical, straight, skinny, not a person of color, or not a victim of maltreatment.
You can't beg for people to evolve from sun sign popstrology and then place restrictions on people who are making an attempt to prove how complex and inclusive astrology actually is.
Why a person would want to find the correlation between an astrological placement or aspects and incest, rape, or other forms of abuse?
I don't know. You don't know either. Nor do you know that person, because chances are, they've actually experienced those things and are using astrology, like other philosophies, to find answers and explanations so that they can find closure within themselves to move on.
Astrology is used to identify patterns and explain the world that we live in, what the hell is going on, and that includes the people who live in it that are composed of different physical features, personalities/beliefs, and mental states on a continuum.
To exclude topics isn't progressive at all. What's progressive is enlightening someone how they could improve the articulation of their point instead of insulting them and telling them that it's not "REAL astrology".












