#1266

PT: 1266: Lesdemiboy /end PT

DEFINITION ⦂⠀A variant of "lesboy" for lesbians who are a "demiboy", instead of a "boy".

PT: Definition: A variant of "lesboy" for lesbians who are a "demiboy", instead of a "boy". /end PT

ADDITIONAL ⦂⠀Coined on the 7th of June, 2026.

PT: Additional: Coined on the 7th of June, 2026. /end PT

TAGGING ⦂⠀@c1rcus-of-silliness @dearestchild @goregender @radiomogai

Warren from Peggle

"magic hat :)"

True History of the Kelly Gang is a 2019 bushranger film directed by Justin Kurzel, written by Shaun Grant, and based upon the 2000 novel of the same name by Peter Carey.

Bushrangers were armed robbers and outlaws who resided in the Australian bush between the 1780s and the early 1900s. The original use of the term dates back to the early years of the British colonisation of Australia, and applied to transported convicts who had escaped into the bush to hide from the authorities. By the 1820s, the term had evolved to refer to those who took up "robbery under arms" as a way of life, using the bush as their base.

A TAKE AWAY FROM BULLIED TO BULLY TO ROBIN HOOD FIGURE A THIEVE AND MURDERER TO HERO BECOMING A LEGEND.

WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT OUR GOVERNMENTS TURNING US INTO BULLIED HEROS IN CLASS STRUGGLE.

In the century after his death, Kelly became a cultural icon, inspiring numerous works in the arts and popular culture, and is the subject of more biographies than any other Australian. Kelly continues to cause division in his homeland: some celebrate him as an Australian Robin Hood, while others regard him as a murderous villain undeserving of his folk hero status. Journalist Martin Flanagan wrote: "What makes Ned a legend is not that everyone sees him the same—it's that everyone sees him. Like a bushfire on the horizon casting its red glow into the night."

READ MORE: Ned Kelly - Wikipedia

Thomasin Mckenzie (19) in True History Of The Kelly Gang (2019)

The film "True History Of The Kelly Gang (2019)" is a fictionalised account of the life of bushranger and outlaw Ned Kelly.

True History of the Kelly Gang (film) - Wikipedia

Australian bushranger Ned Kelly and his gang flee from authorities during the 1870s.

True History of the Kelly Gang (2019) - IMDb 6'0

There is a small inconvenience of Romanian subtitles.

LINK https://ok.ru/video/6315053550242

NOTES:

A final discussion with AI Copilot on all of the above which I found fascinating:

In a blog I am preparing about the film "True History of the Kelly Gang (2019)" I say this about Ned Kelly : A TAKE AWAY FROM BULLIED TO BULLY TO ROBIN HOOD FIGURE A THIEVE AND MURDERER TO HERO BECOMING A LEGEND. WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT OUR GOVERNMENTS TURNING US INTO BULLIED HEROS IN CLASS STRUGGLE. What's your take on it

Copilot: Your blog touches on a fascinating and complex transformation of Ned Kelly from a bullied individual to a legendary figure. This narrative can indeed reflect broader societal dynamics, particularly in the context of class struggle.

Ned Kelly’s journey from a victim of oppression to a symbol of resistance mirrors how marginalized individuals or groups can be pushed to extremes by systemic injustices. Governments and institutions, through their policies and actions, can sometimes inadvertently create the very resistance they seek to suppress. When people feel oppressed or bullied by those in power, they may resort to drastic measures, and in some cases, these actions can elevate them to heroic status in the eyes of the public.

This phenomenon isn’t unique to Kelly’s story. Throughout history, many figures who were initially seen as outlaws or rebels have been reinterpreted as heroes or martyrs, especially when their actions highlight the flaws and injustices of the ruling systems. This can be seen in various movements where individuals fight against perceived tyranny or inequality, often gaining widespread support and becoming symbols of resistance.

Your blog’s exploration of this theme can provoke thought about the role of government and the impact of its actions on the populace. It raises important questions about how power dynamics and social injustices can shape public perception and historical narratives.

What inspired you to draw this parallel in your blog?

I have mix feelings about societal extremes, such as government institutions justifying by law their state crimes and societal reaction seeking justice using the same methods they are fighting against. One is hero and the other is a villain or vice versa, one and the same. The Ying-Yang of humanity. In other words, an action is good or bad depending on which end of the stick you are on. I can never wrap my head around the good, the bad and the evil. It's sort of confusing on where to take a stance. This sometimes creates in me flaws on my thinking process. What do you suggest. Aristotle's golden means does not help.

Copilot: Your reflections on the complexities of morality and justice are profound and resonate with many philosophical debates. The idea that actions can be perceived differently depending on one’s perspective is indeed a challenging concept to navigate. Here are a few suggestions that might help you find some clarity:

Contextual Understanding: Try to understand the broader context in which actions occur. This includes historical, cultural, and social factors that influence behavior. Understanding the motivations and circumstances behind actions can provide a more nuanced perspective.

Ethical Frameworks: While Aristotle’s Golden Mean might not resonate with you, exploring other ethical frameworks could be beneficial. For instance, Utilitarianism focuses on the greatest good for the greatest number, while Deontological Ethics emphasizes duties and rules. Virtue Ethics, another approach, focuses on the character and virtues of the individual rather than specific actions.

Empathy and Compassion: Cultivating empathy can help in understanding different perspectives. By putting yourself in others’ shoes, you might gain insights into why they act the way they do, which can help in forming a more balanced view.

Critical Thinking: Continuously question and analyze your own beliefs and the information you receive. This can help in identifying biases and developing a more informed stance.

Dialogue and Discussion: Engaging in conversations with others who have different viewpoints can be enlightening. It can challenge your assumptions and help you see issues from multiple angles.

Personal Reflection: Take time to reflect on your values and principles. What do you stand for? What kind of world do you want to contribute to? Personal reflection can help in aligning your actions with your core beliefs.

It’s natural to feel conflicted about these issues, as they are inherently complex and multifaceted. The key is to remain open-minded and willing to adapt your views as you gain more understanding.

How do you usually approach these dilemmas in your writing or daily life?

I take the side of the victim being bullied.

Copilot: That’s a compassionate and empathetic stance to take. Standing up for those who are oppressed or marginalized is a powerful way to address injustices. It aligns with many ethical principles that emphasize the importance of protecting and supporting the vulnerable.

However, it’s also important to consider the complexities of each situation. Sometimes, those who are perceived as victims might also engage in actions that are morally ambiguous or harmful. This doesn’t invalidate their experiences of being bullied, but it does add layers to the narrative.