gem's place

Wednesday Addams 🔪🕷️🕸️

They are avoiding the rain, poor guys!

Top: in Hotel Mario, a cutscene after completing the first hotel shows Roy Koopa grabbing Peach and escaping by running up a vertical wall. While this may seem like simply a cartoonish action, this actually references a real ability Roy has been shown to possess.

Bottom: in his battle in Super Mario World, Roy runs up the walls of his arena in the same manner. 

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology. again, women are female people, anything you say about women in general that has nothing to do with being female is a stereotype.

womb implants*, because you can’t transplant an organ you don’t already have, won’t make males any less male. it’s not their uterus, they’ll be on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives trying to obscure that fact from their body. what good would a borrowed uterus do for a male, anyway? if women aren’t a biological class and it’s more about presentation, why have an organ implanted in you that you will never use and will objectively worsen your quality of life? even if there were doctors so unethical and depraved they’d implant random organs into male bodies, males couldn’t get pregnant or carry a child. i’ve seen that tweet going around saying womb implants for males can happen, yet they fail to explain how. how will they be able to induce the positive feedback loop in pregnancy that releases oxytocin that causes the fetus’s head to move toward the cervix, when the uterus has no nerve endings to connect to? at least in women born without uteri, their bodies are still female and will still respond to pregnancy— males cannot, and will not.

oh, oh, there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology? Yaaaaaayyy, you finally got my point!!!!! except no you didnt because you immediately threw it out and learned nothing.

as for the uterus plants, to be honest i didn't even expect that to be most of your reply, i just threw that in as an aside. i dont even really care that much about the science of human organs, so ill just say i think they'll figure it out and call it a day there. humans are very persistent (as you have demonstrated).

i suspected from the beginning you would not be open to changing your mind on this issue. which is fine, as neither am I. but I find it a bit pathetic that after all we've been through together, you've never moved past your main tactic of repeating your same few talking points, twisting my words into things i never said, and calling my attributed beliefs sexist and racist. I like to think I've actually learned a lot about why I think the way I do and how my opposition thinks. i wonder if you can say the same.

thats right. after everything you said about how males can't be women, after everything you said about how imitating women is just a cruel form of misogyny, after spending days arguing with a complete stranger on the internet, you mistook me for a woman without me even trying, based on nothing but a profile picture of a fictional character.

i said i was nonbinary. you could've taken the hint and just said person, or even "man or woman", and you couldn't.

this is the funniest ending i could've never imagined. at least you unbored me. Truly, this is what it means to go out with a bang.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology. again, women are female people, anything you say about women in general that has nothing to do with being female is a stereotype.

womb implants*, because you can’t transplant an organ you don’t already have, won’t make males any less male. it’s not their uterus, they’ll be on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives trying to obscure that fact from their body. what good would a borrowed uterus do for a male, anyway? if women aren’t a biological class and it’s more about presentation, why have an organ implanted in you that you will never use and will objectively worsen your quality of life? even if there were doctors so unethical and depraved they’d implant random organs into male bodies, males couldn’t get pregnant or carry a child. i’ve seen that tweet going around saying womb implants for males can happen, yet they fail to explain how. how will they be able to induce the positive feedback loop in pregnancy that releases oxytocin that causes the fetus’s head to move toward the cervix, when the uterus has no nerve endings to connect to? at least in women born without uteri, their bodies are still female and will still respond to pregnancy— males cannot, and will not.

oh, oh, there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology? Yaaaaaayyy, you finally got my point!!!!! except no you didnt because you immediately threw it out and learned nothing.

as for the uterus plants, to be honest i didn't even expect that to be most of your reply, i just threw that in as an aside. i dont even really care that much about the science of human organs, so ill just say i think they'll figure it out and call it a day there. humans are very persistent (as you have demonstrated).

i suspected from the beginning you would not be open to changing your mind on this issue. which is fine, as neither am I. but I find it a bit pathetic that after all we've been through together, you've never moved past your main tactic of repeating your same few talking points, twisting my words into things i never said, and calling my attributed beliefs sexist and racist. I like to think I've actually learned a lot about why I think the way I do and how my opposition thinks. i wonder if you can say the same.

thats right. after everything you said about how males can't be women, after everything you said about how imitating women is just a cruel form of misogyny, after spending days arguing with a complete stranger on the internet, you mistook me for a woman without me even trying, based on nothing but a profile picture of a fictional character.

i said i was nonbinary. you could've taken the hint and just said person, or even "man or woman", and you couldn't.

this is the funniest ending i could've never imagined. at least you unbored me. Truly, this is what it means to go out with a bang.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology. again, women are female people, anything you say about women in general that has nothing to do with being female is a stereotype.

womb implants*, because you can’t transplant an organ you don’t already have, won’t make males any less male. it’s not their uterus, they’ll be on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives trying to obscure that fact from their body. what good would a borrowed uterus do for a male, anyway? if women aren’t a biological class and it’s more about presentation, why have an organ implanted in you that you will never use and will objectively worsen your quality of life? even if there were doctors so unethical and depraved they’d implant random organs into male bodies, males couldn’t get pregnant or carry a child. i’ve seen that tweet going around saying womb implants for males can happen, yet they fail to explain how. how will they be able to induce the positive feedback loop in pregnancy that releases oxytocin that causes the fetus’s head to move toward the cervix, when the uterus has no nerve endings to connect to? at least in women born without uteri, their bodies are still female and will still respond to pregnancy— males cannot, and will not.

oh, oh, there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology? Yaaaaaayyy, you finally got my point!!!!! except no you didnt because you immediately threw it out and learned nothing.

as for the uterus plants, to be honest i didn't even expect that to be most of your reply, i just threw that in as an aside. i dont even really care that much about the science of human organs, so ill just say i think they'll figure it out and call it a day there. humans are very persistent (as you have demonstrated).

i suspected from the beginning you would not be open to changing your mind on this issue. which is fine, as neither am I. but I find it a bit pathetic that after all we've been through together, you've never moved past your main tactic of repeating your same few talking points, twisting my words into things i never said, and calling my attributed beliefs sexist and racist. I like to think I've actually learned a lot about why I think the way I do and how my opposition thinks. i wonder if you can say the same.

thats right. after everything you said about how males can't be women, after everything you said about how imitating women is just a cruel form of misogyny, after spending days arguing with a complete stranger on the internet, you mistook me for a woman without me even trying, based on nothing but a profile picture of a fictional character.

i said i was nonbinary. you could've taken the hint and just said person, or even "man or woman", and you couldn't.

this is the funniest ending i could've never imagined. at least you unbored me. Truly, this is what it means to go out with a bang.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology. again, women are female people, anything you say about women in general that has nothing to do with being female is a stereotype.

womb implants*, because you can’t transplant an organ you don’t already have, won’t make males any less male. it’s not their uterus, they’ll be on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives trying to obscure that fact from their body. what good would a borrowed uterus do for a male, anyway? if women aren’t a biological class and it’s more about presentation, why have an organ implanted in you that you will never use and will objectively worsen your quality of life? even if there were doctors so unethical and depraved they’d implant random organs into male bodies, males couldn’t get pregnant or carry a child. i’ve seen that tweet going around saying womb implants for males can happen, yet they fail to explain how. how will they be able to induce the positive feedback loop in pregnancy that releases oxytocin that causes the fetus’s head to move toward the cervix, when the uterus has no nerve endings to connect to? at least in women born without uteri, their bodies are still female and will still respond to pregnancy— males cannot, and will not.

oh, oh, there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology? Yaaaaaayyy, you finally got my point!!!!! except no you didnt because you immediately threw it out and learned nothing.

as for the uterus plants, to be honest i didn't even expect that to be most of your reply, i just threw that in as an aside. i dont even really care that much about the science of human organs, so ill just say i think they'll figure it out and call it a day there. humans are very persistent (as you have demonstrated).

i suspected from the beginning you would not be open to changing your mind on this issue. which is fine, as neither am I. but I find it a bit pathetic that after all we've been through together, you've never moved past your main tactic of repeating your same few talking points, twisting my words into things i never said, and calling my attributed beliefs sexist and racist. I like to think I've actually learned a lot about why I think the way I do and how my opposition thinks. i wonder if you can say the same.

thats right. after everything you said about how males can't be women, after everything you said about how imitating women is just a cruel form of misogyny, after spending days arguing with a complete stranger on the internet, you mistook me for a woman without me even trying, based on nothing but a profile picture of a fictional character.

i said i was nonbinary. you could've taken the hint and just said person, or even "man or woman", and you couldn't.

this is the funniest ending i could've never imagined. at least you unbored me. Truly, this is what it means to go out with a bang.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology. again, women are female people, anything you say about women in general that has nothing to do with being female is a stereotype.

womb implants*, because you can’t transplant an organ you don’t already have, won’t make males any less male. it’s not their uterus, they’ll be on immunosuppressants for the rest of their lives trying to obscure that fact from their body. what good would a borrowed uterus do for a male, anyway? if women aren’t a biological class and it’s more about presentation, why have an organ implanted in you that you will never use and will objectively worsen your quality of life? even if there were doctors so unethical and depraved they’d implant random organs into male bodies, males couldn’t get pregnant or carry a child. i’ve seen that tweet going around saying womb implants for males can happen, yet they fail to explain how. how will they be able to induce the positive feedback loop in pregnancy that releases oxytocin that causes the fetus’s head to move toward the cervix, when the uterus has no nerve endings to connect to? at least in women born without uteri, their bodies are still female and will still respond to pregnancy— males cannot, and will not.

oh, oh, there’s nothing that every woman does or has or is that isn’t based in biology? Yaaaaaayyy, you finally got my point!!!!! except no you didnt because you immediately threw it out and learned nothing.

as for the uterus plants, to be honest i didn't even expect that to be most of your reply, i just threw that in as an aside. i dont even really care that much about the science of human organs, so ill just say i think they'll figure it out and call it a day there. humans are very persistent (as you have demonstrated).

i suspected from the beginning you would not be open to changing your mind on this issue. which is fine, as neither am I. but I find it a bit pathetic that after all we've been through together, you've never moved past your main tactic of repeating your same few talking points, twisting my words into things i never said, and calling my attributed beliefs sexist and racist. I like to think I've actually learned a lot about why I think the way I do and how my opposition thinks. i wonder if you can say the same.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

the google definition is “adult human female.” the conventional usage has been to refer to human females, like women’s health. it’s meant human female for over 600 years. i can guarantee you they were not asking actual women before making that definition lmao, because it’s completely useless. what qualifies as living as a female? what does living female entail? why is that relevant?

i dont identify as a female anymore than i identify as a human being. it’s not a fucking identity, it’s a biological category.

can your white ass stop speaking over an actual black person lmao. black people definitely get ostracized for acting white.

i would care to explain what it means to live as a woman, but i think at this point it's become painfully obvious that anything i say that isnt biology is already sexist in your mind. i could say that womanhood is when a combination of biological and psychological factors in your brain make you see yourself as one after you're old enough to tell the difference. it won't matter, though, because gender identity isn't real to you.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

women are human females. humans of the female sex. the 50% of the human population with a female reproductive system. i don’t know how else to explain this basic fact to you. if a male says he’s partaking in womanhood, he’s forcibly stereotyping or associating every female person alive with his nonsensical ideas of what womanhood is. that is sexism. that is misogyny.

every demographic is expected to act different from each other you worthless white pig. do you know how often i was told i “act white” or “talk white” because i don’t speak in ebonics? of course, you’re so used to whiteness being the absolute standard you can’t comprehend that other races, in fact, have stereotypes for our behavior. you’re so aggressively white and ignorant it’s making me nauseous.

Cambridge Dictionary definition of woman: "an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth"

since "expected" might be a bit easy to twist vague, allow me to clarify. by "expected to act" I mean "punished or looked down on by the overarching society for not being like". gay people are punished for not acting straight enough, autistic people are punished for not acting neurotypical enough, and black people are punished for not acting white enough. only men and women are punished for acting too much like each other.

and finally, for the fourth time now, behavior does not make the man or woman. what's not clicking about that?

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

womanhood is not a fucking behavior pattern, dumbass. “acting like a woman” is sexist. would it be okay to say someone “acts like a black person” or “acts like an autistic person?” stop fucking equating womanhood to women’s stereotypes. woman is a sex class, period. full stop. you can’t act like a woman, you can fulfill the societal expectations of womanhood, but that does not make you a woman.

also, even putting all that aside, you keep getting hung up on this idea that I think a race/gender/sex/neurotype is a "behavior pattern". i think behavior is related to societal expectation and perception, not some kind of ontological class of human. there's stereotypes, then there's observed generalities. group X is more likely to do this behavior than other groups. this is a statement of fact, not a statement of degradation; partially because behavior is highly malleable. as i have stated before and will state once again, behavior does not make the man or woman. i don't think it does, and yet you still pretend i do.

almost like you have no other argument there.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...

the difference i see between race and sex would be this: not every society has "racial roles" but every society does have gender roles. we except men and women to act a certain way, and it tends to be shaped around reproductive roles (i work, you raise). there is no equivalent to this for people of different races, because they're just other people.

if you’re not a woman, you can’t feel confident in your womanhood. if you’re not black, you can’t feel confident in your blackness. to say engaging in stereotypical behavior of a certain sex or race that you are not makes you feel validated in it, you’re effectively saying that is what makes a woman, or a black person.

this is where i start to draw my personal objections to the race analogy. they are both axis of oppression, but there are differences between race and gender. socially for example, if you're a woman, you're expected to conform to womanly expectations, but if you're black, you're expected to conform to white expectations. then there's the fact that not many trans people (especially not black trans people) actually support trans-racialism to begin with, because they acknowledge this difference. i have never seen this as a point of discussion except from transphobes as a mocking joke because of that lady from 2014.

also, the take at the end is very interesting to me, and even seems to come out of left field. it matters if someone is trans because it's either internalized or externalized misogyny: because a woman can't feel valid about her womanhood by being feminine? its ultimately wrong to take pride in acting feminine and womanlike no matter who does it? doesn't that sound so...