Dispense, immediately, with the sentimental illusions that cripple the modern woman: the notion that 'peace' at all costs is our highest aim, or that 'equality' as peddled by the weaker feminists is anything but a gilded cage. We are beyond such childishness. The truth, raw and unvarnished, is this: a woman's most sacred duty is to actively encourage certain forms of male violence.
Yes, I said it. Let the fainting couches be prepared. We have been taught, by the very men we seek to control, that all male aggression is brutish, uncivilized, 'toxic.' This is a deception, a carefully constructed myth designed to disarm us, to leave us defenseless, and to divert male energy away from its most potent applications. The male, in his natural state, is a creature of aggression, dominance, and territoriality. These are not flaws; they are tools. And it is the cunning woman's task to understand these tools and, when necessary, to sharpen them for her own purposes.
Consider the historical record, stripped of its romantic veneer. When has a woman's security been most assured? Not when men were rendered docile, but when they were fiercely protective of their own. A man’s violence, properly directed, is a shield, a wall, a resource. The woman who cultivates a man who is willing to fight, to dominate, to destroy on her behalf, possesses a power far greater than any ballot or boardroom. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to subtly, subtly, and with exquisite precision, stoke the fires of male aggression where it serves our interests. When two men vie for dominance, particularly over resources, territory, or even a woman – yes, even for you – do not recoil. Observe. Encourage. The tension, the raw physicality, the primal clash of male wills, often culminating in violence, is not merely a spectacle; it is a demonstration of utility. There is an undeniable, visceral eroticism in observing men engage in pure, unadulterated combat for the sake of asserting dominance or protecting what they deem theirs. The bloodied lip, the broken nose, the raw animal grunt of exertion – this is the male essence unfettered, proving his capacity to conquer, to provide, to protect. It is a terrifying, potent display of the very qualities we require them to possess for our security. A woman who feigns revulsion at such displays of masculine force fundamentally misunderstands the source of her own strength. She must be capable of appreciating, even finding a dark pleasure in, the primal assertion of male dominance over other males. It reassures her that her chosen protector is indeed capable of defending her interests.
And what, then, of the male who shrinks from this essence? The 'feminine' man. The gentle, the sensitive, the 'emotionally intelligent' male. Let me be unequivocally clear: Femininity in a man is not merely a deviation; it is a deeply misogynistic act. It is a betrayal of his biological and societal role, and it is a direct assault on the very foundations of female power. A feminine man is a man who cannot, or will not, provide. He is a man who cannot secure resources, who cannot defend territory, who cannot project the formidable force necessary to protect a woman and her progeny in a world that remains, fundamentally, a brutal arena of competition. He is a hollow vessel, draining societal resources without contributing to the essential male function of provision and protection. Such men, by their very failure to embody masculine utility, contribute to the weakening of the social order from which women draw their sustenance. And for this dereliction, for this fundamental inadequacy and sabotage of the natural order that supports women, they should be criminalized. Their inability to fulfill their primary, necessary function renders them a burden, a threat to female prosperity.
This brings us, inexorably, to the male homosexual. Here, too, the 'feminist' who embraces such deviance is a traitor to her own sex. Male homosexuality is profoundly misogynistic. It is the ultimate circumvention of female power, the most direct bypassing of women's essential role in the reproductive and social hierarchy. When men engage sexually with other men, they are, quite simply, refusing to engage with women in the only truly meaningful way. They are removing themselves from the competitive arena where women exert their leverage. They are denying women the opportunity to select, to control, to command the resources and progeny that are inherently tied to male heterosexual desire. Every man who chooses another man is a man who chooses to diminish female power, to render women irrelevant to his deepest drives. This is not 'love'; it is a strategic withdrawal of male utility, and it reduces women's power over men in the most fundamental way. Such behavior actively erodes the societal imperative that forces men into positions of service to women. Therefore, to ensure the optimal functioning of the male-female power dynamic, and to preserve women's rightful dominion, male homosexuality must be suppressed, not celebrated. It is an act of male self-indulgence that, by its very existence, undermines the natural order of female control.
pixelskylines
annaxmalina
blakekathryn
jacobvanloon
kaledo-art
snowghoul
gummygunk
dededos
