i love this woman’s twitter
Mike Driver
tumblr dot com
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

pixel skylines
styofa doing anything

⁂

blake kathryn

JVL

Kaledo Art

2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
ojovivo
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
KIROKAZE

oozey mess
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
will byers stan first human second

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
seen from Greece
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from Belgium

seen from Israel
seen from Iraq
seen from Maldives
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@d00rm
i love this woman’s twitter

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Dispense, immediately, with the sentimental illusions that cripple the modern woman: the notion that 'peace' at all costs is our highest aim, or that 'equality' as peddled by the weaker feminists is anything but a gilded cage. We are beyond such childishness. The truth, raw and unvarnished, is this: a woman's most sacred duty is to actively encourage certain forms of male violence.
Yes, I said it. Let the fainting couches be prepared. We have been taught, by the very men we seek to control, that all male aggression is brutish, uncivilized, 'toxic.' This is a deception, a carefully constructed myth designed to disarm us, to leave us defenseless, and to divert male energy away from its most potent applications. The male, in his natural state, is a creature of aggression, dominance, and territoriality. These are not flaws; they are tools. And it is the cunning woman's task to understand these tools and, when necessary, to sharpen them for her own purposes.
Consider the historical record, stripped of its romantic veneer. When has a woman's security been most assured? Not when men were rendered docile, but when they were fiercely protective of their own. A man’s violence, properly directed, is a shield, a wall, a resource. The woman who cultivates a man who is willing to fight, to dominate, to destroy on her behalf, possesses a power far greater than any ballot or boardroom. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to subtly, subtly, and with exquisite precision, stoke the fires of male aggression where it serves our interests. When two men vie for dominance, particularly over resources, territory, or even a woman – yes, even for you – do not recoil. Observe. Encourage. The tension, the raw physicality, the primal clash of male wills, often culminating in violence, is not merely a spectacle; it is a demonstration of utility. There is an undeniable, visceral eroticism in observing men engage in pure, unadulterated combat for the sake of asserting dominance or protecting what they deem theirs. The bloodied lip, the broken nose, the raw animal grunt of exertion – this is the male essence unfettered, proving his capacity to conquer, to provide, to protect. It is a terrifying, potent display of the very qualities we require them to possess for our security. A woman who feigns revulsion at such displays of masculine force fundamentally misunderstands the source of her own strength. She must be capable of appreciating, even finding a dark pleasure in, the primal assertion of male dominance over other males. It reassures her that her chosen protector is indeed capable of defending her interests.
And what, then, of the male who shrinks from this essence? The 'feminine' man. The gentle, the sensitive, the 'emotionally intelligent' male. Let me be unequivocally clear: Femininity in a man is not merely a deviation; it is a deeply misogynistic act. It is a betrayal of his biological and societal role, and it is a direct assault on the very foundations of female power. A feminine man is a man who cannot, or will not, provide. He is a man who cannot secure resources, who cannot defend territory, who cannot project the formidable force necessary to protect a woman and her progeny in a world that remains, fundamentally, a brutal arena of competition. He is a hollow vessel, draining societal resources without contributing to the essential male function of provision and protection. Such men, by their very failure to embody masculine utility, contribute to the weakening of the social order from which women draw their sustenance. And for this dereliction, for this fundamental inadequacy and sabotage of the natural order that supports women, they should be criminalized. Their inability to fulfill their primary, necessary function renders them a burden, a threat to female prosperity.
This brings us, inexorably, to the male homosexual. Here, too, the 'feminist' who embraces such deviance is a traitor to her own sex. Male homosexuality is profoundly misogynistic. It is the ultimate circumvention of female power, the most direct bypassing of women's essential role in the reproductive and social hierarchy. When men engage sexually with other men, they are, quite simply, refusing to engage with women in the only truly meaningful way. They are removing themselves from the competitive arena where women exert their leverage. They are denying women the opportunity to select, to control, to command the resources and progeny that are inherently tied to male heterosexual desire. Every man who chooses another man is a man who chooses to diminish female power, to render women irrelevant to his deepest drives. This is not 'love'; it is a strategic withdrawal of male utility, and it reduces women's power over men in the most fundamental way. Such behavior actively erodes the societal imperative that forces men into positions of service to women. Therefore, to ensure the optimal functioning of the male-female power dynamic, and to preserve women's rightful dominion, male homosexuality must be suppressed, not celebrated. It is an act of male self-indulgence that, by its very existence, undermines the natural order of female control.
I don't understand "get a rich man" psychosis. If men who have $26 in savings act entitled and treat you badly- why do you think men with ample resources and actual financial power to get whatever they want, when they want, will treat you better? Rich men are potentially far more dangerous to invite into your life, especially if you allow yourself to become totally dependent. Also, rich men aren't marrying girls who work at Walgreens. They will pump and dump you but they will not marry you, I'm sorry. They're marrying friends of friends within their social class or models and actresses. Please be for real.
I see so much sprinkle sprinkle stuff nowadays thinking yall radfems y'all are not
So this TIM apparently committed suicide, and this was his final post. His body was found in the river. Conservatives are laughing their ass off and being dicks about it and leftists are predictably have a virtue signaling collective orgasm over the whole ordeal, calling him a "sweet little girl" and bleating about kindness and compassion. The usual dynamic. It's just frustrating that both sides refuse to acknowledge the part they play in these outcomes. Conservative men bullying effeminate young men and making existence as a low status male hell -> liberals then indulge his escapist fantasy of "being a girl", refusing to treat the actual reasons some young boys are transing and smothering them with indulgent "kindness and compassion" which is really them giving them a soul destroying level of grandoise entitlement and delusion that the world can never and will never fully deliver on. Hegemonic masculinity- both the rightist and leftist versions- are killing these boys. Mind you, both conservatives and leftists blame women and feminism. Conservatives think women/feminism are making all boys panseys and that all feminists support gender ideology, and leftists think anyone who doesn't indulge the delusion that he was a" little girl" instead of the 17-year-old boy he actually was is responsible for his death- aka terfs are to blame. So, regardless of how you look at it- man sad, woman villain, as usual.
I don't claim that patriarchy also "hurts men" because it is a system of men oppressing women
However it does debase men and degrade their characters. In order to maintain their control and hatred of women they reduce themselves to something self destructive and often destructive of the inverts that exist within them. Here is the result.
TIMs think male socialization = becoming a successful male. They reason that the fact that they failed to be a successful, exalted man, means that they're really a woman. With this admission-they reveal they do not resist or challenge patriarchal hierarchy or status quo- in fact, trooning out is the final act of submission and worship of patriarchy. They feel more comfortable being lowly and humiliated in the role of "woman" than in the role of "man". Ultimately,they transition to protect the male image- no man as low as I, may call himself "man", so I will call myself wo-man. That is really their creed. This whole thing is a love letter to patriarchy.
It's hsts ashamed of being gay

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
calling men that express their disgust with women’s bodies (cellulite, body hair, different shapes of breasts/vulvas) gay implies that:
1. homosexuality is shameful and can be used as a gotcha
2. hating women’s bodies makes a man less heterosexual.
males have always combined the two - thinking our bodies are gross, malformed, unclean, and wanting to fuck us. this tradition seems to be old as times. there’s no magical “love” that makes a straight man see women as people just because hes attracted to them.
their sexual attraction, disgust and hatred go hand in hand.
Fuck that faggot
I’m reblogging it everytime I see it. Sorry, not sorry.
It's Pride. So it's the time of year where I remind everybody that Fred Sargeant, a founder of the original Gay Pride and Stonewall riots veteran, does not support TQ gender evangelism, it's historical revisionism of gay history, and what it has done and is doing to the LGB and women's liberation movements.
Fred Sergeant, today:
Happy Pride.
happy pride month same sex attracted individuals
everything needs to be about men!
same sex attracted individual erasure as always <3

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
my therapist suggested i imagine my intrusive thoughts in the voice of donald trump bc i do not possess an ounce of respect for him or trust in his competence. going thru it today so i made this. hope this helps
Imagine noticing something across all cultures, societies, all recorded time, every place, no matter if isolated, partially isolated, or fully under influence of other cultures, and calling that socialization.
Yes, I do believe a rough home life, porn and violent video games do increase the chances of men becoming violent, but even before porn and violent video games existed, patriarchy was still something that existed, women have been treated like shit for thousands of years.
The fact of the matter is men are biologically wired to be more violent than women, and I’m not saying this to excuse them, obviously men have control over their actions, they aren’t mindless, unthinking beasts who are slaves to their biological urges, otherwise they would attack people randomly, but rarely ever do men attack men who are physically stronger than them, their boss or anyone over them like that, they specifically target anyone weaker than them that can’t fight back, so typically women, children and animals.
I just want to bring this up on here because if we don’t acknowledge every aspect of why the patriarchy is a thing, because this conversation is uncomfortable, we will never become liberated.
How then does one abolish gender?
If a woman slapped on a plucked wig to mimic male pattern baldness and pretended to be a middle-aged, gay male character called Colin Oscapy, all of a sudden, it would no longer be performance art. Men, all men, in their own unique ways, see the humiliation and degradation of women as no big deal. They EXPECT to be able to degrade women as part of their entitlement as men. It's the same reason why men are now running around saying "bitch" is not a slur- even though it fits all the requirements to be considered a slur and has been considered a slur for literal hundreds of years. The disrespect has always been there.
Faggot faggot faggot
stop trying to wokeify hermaphodites it's a condition not a gender identity they're still either men or women
We live in actual hell

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
fuck off with this mentality
"ooohh matriarchy is going to be so sweet and motherly we'll all wear aprons and sing each other lullabies, flutter our eyelashes while stroking each others clits with our divine feminine powers🥺"
your matriarchy is rooted in patriarchy🤦♀️
Exactly this entire fucking shit about divine feminine and women's natural caring essence is based on men's interpretation of us in order to keep us docile and submissive. We need to repeal it not buy into it.